Hypothesis testing procedures for a series of independent fourfold tables under inverse sampling

Biometrical Journal

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 347-357

  Lui, Kung Jong ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Inverse sampling; Monte Carlo simulation; Negative binomial; Type I error

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; ERROR STATISTICS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; STATISTICAL TESTS;

HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INVERSE SAMPLING; MONTE CARLO'S SIMULATION; NEGATIVE BINOMIAL; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION; SMALL SAMPLES; SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION; TEST STATISTICS; TESTING PROCEDURE; TYPE-I ERROR;

SAMPLING;

EID: 0030530885     PISSN: 03233847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.4710380311     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ANSCOMBE. F. J., 1948: The transformation of Poisson, binomial, and negative-binomial data. Biometrika 35, 246-254.
2. ASH. R. B., 1972: Real Analysis and Probability. Academic Press, New York.
3. BARTON. D. E., 1967: Comparison of sample sizes in inverse binomial sampling (Query 21). Technometrics 9, 337-339.
4. BENNETT. B. M., 1981: On the use of the negative binomial in epidemiology. Biometrical Journal 23, 69-72.
5. BENNETT. B. M., 1986: On combining estimates of relative risk using the negative binomial model. Biometrical Journal 28, 859-862.
6. BISHOP. Y. M. M., FIENBERG. S. E., and HOLLAND. P. W., 1975: Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
7. CASELLA. G. and BERGER. R. L., 1990: Statistical Inference. Duxbury Press. Belmont, California.
8. CHI. P. Y., 1980: Testing for homogeneity: the negative binomial distribution. Biometrika 67, 252-254.
9. FISHER. R. A., 1924: On a distribution yielding the error functions of several well known statistics. Proceedings of the International Mathematical Congress, Toronto, 2, 805-813.
10. FLEISS. J. L., 1981: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd edition. Wiley, New York.
11. FLEISS. J. L., 1986: The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. Wiley, New York.
12. HALDANE. J. B. S., 1945a: A labour-saving method of sampling. Nature 155, 49-50.
13. HALDANE. J. B. S., 1945b: On a method of estimating frequencies. Biometrika 33, 222-225.
14. JOHNSON. N. L., and KOTZ. S., 1970: Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Univariate Distributions -2. Wiley, New York.
15. KATZ. D., BAPTISTA. J., AZEN. S. P., and PIKE. M. C., 1978: Obtaining confidence intervals for the risk ratio in cohort studies. Biometrics 34, 469-474.
16. KUDO. A. and TARUMI. T. 1978: 2 x 2 tables emerging out of different chance mechanisms. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods A7, 977-986.
17. LUI. K.-J., 1991: Sample sizes for repeated measurements in dichotomous data. Statistics in Medicine 10, 463-472.
18. LUI. K.-J., 1995: Confidence intervals for the risk ratio in cohort studies under inverse sampling. Biometrical Journal 37, 965-971.
19. LUI. K.-J., 1996: Notes on confidence limits for the odds ratio in case-control studies under inverse sampling. Biometrical Journal, in press.
20. SALVIA. A. A., 1984: Testing equality of binomial parameters based on inverse sampling. IEEE Transactions on Reliability R-33. 377-378.
21. SAS Institute, Inc., 1990: SAS Language, Reference Version 6. 1st edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.