The extensile rectus snip exposure in revision of total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 85, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1120-1122

  Meek, R M D ^a,b   Greidanus, N V ^a   McGraw, R W ^a   Masri, B A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b SOUTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; JOINT FUNCTION; JOINT MOBILITY; KNEE FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATELLA TENDON; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RECTUS FEMORIS MUSCLE; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0344898434     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.85B8.14214     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Masri BA, Campbell DG, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Seven specialised exposures for revision hip and knee replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 1998; 29:229-40.
2. Younger AS, Duncan CP, Masri BA. Surgical exposures in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1998; 6:55-64.
3. Insall JN. Surgical approaches. In: Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, Kelly MA, Aglietti P, eds. Surgery of the knee, Second ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1993;135-48.
4. Rosenberg AG. Surgical technique of posterior cruciate sacrificing, and preserving total knee arthroplasty. In: Rand JA, ed. Total knee arthroplasty. New York: Raven Press, 1993;115-53.
5. Garvin KL, Scuderi G, Insall JN. Evolution of the quadriceps snip. Clin Orthop 1995, 321:131-7.
6. Barrack RL, Smith P, Munn B, Engh GA, Rorabeck C. Comparison of surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998;356:16-21.
7. Barrack RL. Specialised surgical exposure for revision total knee: quadriceps snip and patellar turndown. Instr Course Lect 1999;48: 149-52.
8. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, McKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic co-morbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 1987;40:373-83.
9. Engh GA. Bone defect classification. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH, eds. Revision total knee arthroplasty. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1997;63-120.
10. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996;78-B:185-90.
11. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220-33.
12. Brazier JE, Harper R, Munro J, Walters SJ, Snaith ML. Generic and condition outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999;38:870-7.
13. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L. Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty: results of a survey of 3600 patients from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:339-44.
14. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ, Wright EA, Sledge CB; Kinemax outcomes group: validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society clinical rating system in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83-A:1856-64.