The dynamic nature of language lateralization: Effects of lexical and prosodic factors

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1008-1019

  Grimshaw, Gina M ^a   Kwasny, Kristin M ^b   Covell, Ed ^c   Johnson, Ryan A ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Dichotic listening; Emotion; Hemispheric specialization; Language; Prosody

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; EAR; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEFT HEMISPHERE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 0344837399     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00315-9     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Asbjornsen A., Hugdahl K., Bryden M.P. Manipulations of subjects' level of arousal in dichotic listening. Brain and Cognition. 19:1992;183-194.
2. Behrens S.J. The perception of stress and the lateralization of prosody. Brain and Language. 26:1985;332-348.
3. Belger A., Banich M.T. Interhemispheric interaction affected by computational complexity. Neuropsychologia. 30:1992;923-929.
4. Borod J.C., Cicero B.A., Obler L.K., Welkowitz J., Erhan H.M., Santschi C.et al. Right hemisphere emotional perception: evidence across multiple channels. Neuropsychology. 12:1998;446-458.
5. Brown C.P., Fitch H.R., Tallal P. Sex and hemispheric differences for rapid auditory processing in normal adults. Laterality. 4:1999;39-50.
6. Bryden M.P., MacRae L. Dichotic laterality effects obtained with emotional words. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology. 1:1988;171-176.
7. Bryden M.P., Free T., Gagne S., Groff P. Handedness effects in the detection of dichotically-presented words and emotions. Cortex. 27:1991;229-235.
8. Buchanan T.W., Lutz K., Mirzazade S., Specht K., Shah N.J., Zilles K.et al. Recognition of emotional prosody and verbal components of spoken language: an fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research. 9:2000;227-238.
9. Chase D, Abboud H. Superlab Pro 1997. Phoenix AZ: Cedrus Corporation.
10. Clarke JM, McCann CM, Zaidel E. The corpus callosum and language: anatomical-behavioral relationships. In: Beeman M, Chiarello C, editors. Right-hemisphere language comprehension: perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.; 1998. p. 27-50.
11. Cohen J.D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., Provost J. PsyScope: a new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers. 25:1993;257-271.
12. Compton R.J., Heller W., Banich M.T., Palmieri P.A., Miller G.A. Responding to threat: hemispheric asymmetries and interhemispheric division of input. Neuropsychology. 14:2000;254-264.
13. Elias L.J., Bryden M.P., Bulman-Fleming M.B. Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization. Neuropsychologia. 36:1998;37-43.
14. Erhan H., Borod J.C., Tenke C.E., Bruder G.E. Identification of emotion in a dichotic listening task: event-related brain potential and behavioral findings. Brain and Cognition. 37:1998;286-307.
15. Gainotti G., Caltagirone C., Miceli G., Masullo C. Selective semantic-lexical impairment of language comprehension in right-brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language. 13:1981;201-211.
16. Gazzaniga M.S., Sperry R.W. Language after section of the cerebral hemispheres. Brain. 90:1967;131-148.
17. Grimshaw G.M., Bryden M.P., Finegan J.K. Relations between prenatal testosterone and cerebral lateralization in children. Neuropsychology. 9:1995;68-79.
18. Heilman K.M., Bowers D., Speedie L., Coslett H.B. Comprehension of affective and nonaffective prosody. Neurology. 34:1984;917-921.
19. 15O -PET study Neuropsychologia. 37:1997;431-440.
20. Ivry RB, Robertson LC. The two sides of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.
21. Kimura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 15:1961;166-171.
22. Lane R.D., Chua P.M., Dolan R.J. Common effects of emotional valence. Neuropsychologia. 37:1999;989-997.
23. Lassonde M., Bryden M.P., Demers P. The corpus callosum and cerebral speech lateralization. Brain and Language. 38:1990;195-206.
24. Ley R.G., Bryden M.P. A dissociation of right and left hemispheric effects for recognizing emotional tone and verbal content. Brain and Cognition. 1:1982;3-9.
25. Milner B., Taylor L., Sperry R.W. Lateralized suppression of dichotically presented digits after commissural section in man. Science. 161:1968;184-186.
26. Moscovitch M. Language and the cerebral hemispheres: reaction-time studies and their implications for models of cerebral dominance. In: Pliner P, Krames L, Alloway T, editors. Communication and affect: language and thought. New York: Academic Press; 1973. p. 89-126.
27. Moscovitch M. Afferent and efferent models of visual perceptual asymmetries: theoretical and empirical implications. Neuropsychologia. 24:1986;91-114.
28. Musiek F.E., Wilson D.H. SSW and dichotic digit results pre- and post-commissurotomy: a case report. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 44:1979;528-533.
29. Nicholls M.E.R., Whelan R.E., Brown S. A left-hemisphere temporal processing advantage for auditory and tactile stimuli. Brain and Cognition. 40:1999;202-206.
30. O'Leary D.S., Andreasen N.C., Hurtig R.R., Hichwa R.D., Watkins G.L., Ponto L.L.B.et al. A positron emission tomography study of binaurally and dichotically presented stimuli: effects of level of language and directed attention. Brain and Language. 53:1996;20-39.
31. Ross E.D., Edmondson J.A., Seibert G.B., Homan R.W. Acoustic analysis of affective prosody during right-sided Wada Test: a within-subjects verification of the right hemisphere's role in language. Brain and Language. 33:1988;128-145.
32. Sergent J. The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 8:1982;253-272.
33. Shapiro B.E., Danly M. The role of the right hemisphere in the control of speech prosody in prepositional and affective contexts. Brain and Language. 25:1985;19-36.
34. Shipley-Brown F., Dingwall W.O., Berlin C.I. Hemispheric processing of affective and linguistic intonation contours in normal subjects. Brain and Language. 33:1988;16-26.
35. Sparks R., Geschwind N. Dichotic listening in man after section of neocortical commissures. Cortex. 4:1968;3-16.
36. Springer S.P., Gazzaniga M.S. Dichotic testing of partial and complete split brain subjects. Neuropsychologia. 13:1975;341-346.
37. Stirling J., Cavill J., Wilkinson A. Dichotically presented emotionally intoned words produce laterality differences as a function of localisation task. Laterality. 5:2000;363-371.
38. Strauss E., Gaddes W.H., Wada J. Performance on a free-recall verbal dichotic listening task and cerebral dominance determined by the carotid amytal test. Neuropsychologia. 25:1987;747-753.
39. Teng E.L., Sperry R.W. Interhemispheric interaction during simultaneous bilateral presentation of letters or digits in commissurotomized patients. Neuropsychologia. 11:1973;131-140.
40. Umilta C., Rizzolatti G., Anzola G.P., Luppino G., Porro C. Evidence of interhemispheric transmission in laterality effects. Neuropsychologia. 23:1985;203-213.
41. Van Strien J.W., Boon C.A. Altered visual field asymmetry for lexical decision as a result of concurrent presentation of music fragments of different emotional valences. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 3:1997;473-479.
42. Weissman D.H., Banich M.T. The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks. Neuropsychology. 14:2000;41-59.
43. Zaidel E, Clarke JM, Suyenobu B. Hemispheric independence: a paradigm case for cognitive neuroscience. In: Scheibel AB, Wechsler AF, editors. Neurobiology of higher cognitive function. New York: Guilford Press; 1990. p. 297-355.
44. Zaidel E. Auditory vocabulary of the right hemisphere following brain bisection or hemidecortication. Cortex. 12:1976;191-211.
45. Zatorre R.J. Perceptual asymmetry on the Dichotic Fused Words Test and cerebral speech lateralization determined by the Carotid Sodium Amytal Test. Neuropsychologia. 27:1989;1207-1219.