A feasibility study for electromagnetic pollution monitoring by electromagnetic-source localization via neural independent component analysis

Neurocomputing

Volumn 55, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 451-468

  Albini, Luciano ^a   Burrascano, Pietro ^a   Fiori, Simone ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ELECTROMAGNETIC POLLUTION MONITORING; RADIO-BASED TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS; SYNTHETIC SIGNALS;

RADIO COMMUNICATION;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; POLLUTION MONITORING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 0344826104     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-2312(03)00389-8     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. A.J. Bell, T.J. Sejnowski, An information maximisation approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution, Neural Comput. 7 (6) (1995) 1129-1159.
2. E. Bingham, A. Hyvärinen, A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis of complex valued signals, Int. J. Neural Syst. 10 (1) (2000) 1-8.
3. J.-F. Cardoso, A. Souloumiac, Blind beamforming for non Gaussian signals, IEE Proc.-F 140 (6) (1993) 362-370.
4. C.H. Chen, X. Zhan, On the roles of independent component analysis in remote sensing, Proceedings of Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium (PIERS'2000), Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000.
5. A. Cichocki, J. Cao, A self-adaptive neural network for on-line blind separation of convolved sources, in: B.B. Djordjevic, H.D. Reis (Eds.), Topics on Non-destructive Evaluation Series, Vol. 3, The American Society for Non-destructive Evaluation Testing Inc., Columbus, OH, 1998, pp. 207-212.
6. P. Comon, Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal Process. 36 (1994) 287-314.
7. Y. Deville, Towards industrial applications of blind source separation and independent component analysis, Proceedings of Independent Component Analysis Conference (ICA'99), 1999, pp. 19-24.
8. S. Fiori, Blind signal processing by the adaptive activation function network, Neural Networks 13 (6) (2000) 597-611.
9. S, Fiori, Blind separation of circularly distributed source signals by the neural extended APEX algorithm, Neurocomputing 34 (1-4) (2000) 239-252.
10. S. Fiori, A theory for learning by weight flow on Stiefel-Grassman manifold, Neural Comput. 13 (7) (2001) 1625-1647.
11. S. Fiori, On blind separation of complex-valued sources by extended Hebbian learning, IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 8 (8) (2001) 217-220.
12. S. Fiori, A theory for learning based on rigid bodies dynamics, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 13 (3) (2002) 521-531.
13. S. Fiori, P. Burrascano, ECT-data fusion by the independent component analysis for non-destructive evaluation of metallic stabs, Third International Conference on Independent Component Analysis and Signal Separation, San Diego, CA, December 9-13, 2001, pp. 323-327.
14. S. Fiori, F. Piazza, A General Class of ψ-APEX PCA neural algorithms, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. - Part I 47 (9) (2000) 1394-1398.
15. A. Flexer, H. Bauer, Monitoring human information processing via intelligent data analysis of EEG recordings, Intell. Data Anal. 4 (2000) 113-128.
16. X. Giannakopoulos, J. Karhunen, E. Oja, An experimental comparison of neural algorithms for independent component analysis and blind separation, Int. J. Neural Syst. 9 (2) (1999) 99-114.
17. M. Girolami, C. Fyfe, Extraction of independent signal sources using a deflationary exploratory projection pursuit network with lateral inhibition, IEE Proc. - Vision, Image Signal Process. 14 (5) (1997) 299-306.
18. A. Hyvärinen, J. Karhunen, E. Oja, Independent Component Analysis, Wiley, New York, 2001.
19. A. Hyvärinen, E. Oja, Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications, Neural Networks 13 (2000) 411-430.
20. ICNIRP, Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz), Health Phys. 74(4) (1998) 494-522.
21. IEEE Std. C.95.3-1991, IEEE Recommended practice for the measurements of potentially hazardous electromagnetic fields - RF and microwave, New York, 1991.
22. IEEE Std. C.95.1-1999, IEEE Standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz-300 GHz, New York, 1999.
23. ITU-R Rec.S.M.326-7, Determination and measurements of the power of amplitude-modulated radio transmitters, 1998.
24. K.H. Knuth, Bayesian source separation and localization, in: A. Mohammad-Djafari (Ed.), SPIE'98 Proceedings: Bayesian Inference for Inverse Problems, San Diego, 1998, pp. 147-158.
25. T.-W. Lee, Independent Component Analysis - Theory and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 1998.
26. R.-w. Liu, Blind signal processing: an introduction, Proceedings of International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (IEEE-ISCAS), Vol. 2, 1996, pp. 81-84.
27. D. Slater, Near Field Antenna Measurements, Artech House, Norwood, MA, 1991.
28. R. Vigario, E. Oja, Independence: a new criterion for the analysis of the electromagnetic fields in the global brain?, Neural Networks 13 (8/9) (2000) 891-907.
29. H.J. Wieringa, MEG, EEG and the integration with magnetic resonance images, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 1993.
30. H.H. Yang, S.-i. Amari, Adaptive online learning algorithms for blind separation: maximum entropy and minimum mutual information, Neural Comput. 9 (1997) 1457-1482.
31. A. Ypma, Creating virtual sensors for machine monitoring with independent component analysis, J. Acoust. Soc. Neth. 145 (1999) 1-12 (in Dutch).