Forensic Implications of the Foot and Ankle

Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 221-225

  Rich, Jeremy ^a   Dean, Dorothy E ^b,d   Cheung, Yvonne Y ^c  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Franklin County Coroner's Office   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ankle; Foot; Forensic pathology; Forensic science; Human identification

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT; ANKLE; DATA ANALYSIS; FOOT; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; FORENSIC MEDICINE; FORENSIC PATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW;

EID: 0344496871     PISSN: 10672516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1067-2516(03)70032-5     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. DiMaio DJ, DiMaio VJM. Medicolegal investigative systems. In Forensic pathology, p 1, Elsevier, New York, 1989.
2. Steele DG. The estimation of sex on the basis of the talus and the calcaneus. Am J Phys Anthropol 45:581-588, 1976.
3. Smith SL. Attribution of foot bones to sex and population groups. J Forensic Sci 42:186-195, 1997.
4. Huxley AK. Comparison of gestational age values derived from diaphyseal length and foot length from forensic foetal remains. Med Sci Law 38:42-51, 1998.
5. Batamanabane M, Malathis S. Identification of human second, third, and fourth metatarsal bones. Anat Rec 207:509-511, 1983.
6. Introna F Jr, Di Vella G, Campobasso CP, Dragone M. Sex determination by discriminant analysis of calcanei measurements. J Forensic Sci 42:725-728, 1997.
7. Sivaloganathan S, Butt WP. A foot in the yard. Med Sci Law 28:150156, 1988.
8. Byers S, Akoshima K, Curran B. Determination of adult stature from metatarsal length. Am J Phys Anthropol 79:275-279, 1989.
9. Robling AG, Ubelaker DH. Sex determination from the metatarsals. J Forensic Sci. 42:1062-1069, 1997.
10. Singh SS, Singh SP. Identification of sex from tarsal bones. Acta Anat 93:568-573, 1975.
11. Gordon CC, Buikstra JE. Linear models for the prediction of stature from foot and boot dimensions. J Forensic Sci 37:771-782, 1992.
12. Giles E, Vallandigham PH. Height estimation from foot and shoeprint length. J Forensic Sci 36:1134-1151, 1991.
13. Leonetti G, Signoli M, Pelissier AL, Champsaur P, Hershkovitz I, Brunet C, Dutour O. Evidence of pin implantation as a means of verifying death during the great plague of Marseilles. J Forensic Sci 42:744-748, 1997.
14. Rich J. Increasing the identification potential from human foot remains. J Forensic Sci. 45:505-506, 2000.
15. Glaister J, Brash JC. The feet and the shoes. In Medico-Legal Aspects of the Ruxton Case, pp 138-143, William Wood, Baltimore, 1937.
16. Rich J, Tatarek NE, Powers RH, Brogdon BG, Lewis BJ, Dean DE. Using pre- and post-surgical foot and ankle radiographs for identification. J Forensic Sci 47:1319-1322, 2002.
17. Haglund WD. Disappearance of soft tissues and the disarticulation of human beings from aqueous environments. J Forensic Sci 38:806-815, 1993.
18. Mann RW, Owsley DW. Medicolegal investigation involving a bearpaw. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 80:623-625, 1990.
19. Stewart TD. Essentials of Forensic Anthropology: Especially as Developed in the United States, pp 45-58, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1979.
20. Murphy WA, Spruill FG, Gantner GE. Radiologic identification of unknown human remains. J Forensic Sci 25:727-735, 1980.
21. Murphy WA, Gantner GE. Radiologic examination of anatomical parts and skeletonized remains. J Forensic Sci 27:9-18, 1982.
22. Mann RW. Use of the trabeculae to establish positive identification. Forensic Sci Int 98:91-99, 1998.
23. Evans KT, Knight B, Whittaker DK. Radiology in identification. In Forensic Radiology, pp 3-46, Blackwell, Oxford, 1982.
24. Brogdon BG. Radiological identification of individual remains. In Forensic Radiology, pp 149-187, edited by BG Brogdon, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1998.
25. Nye PJ, Tytle TL, Jarman RN, Eaton BG. The role of radiology in the Oklahoma City bombing. Radiology 200:541-543, 1996.
26. Franz N. APMA news. September:48-49, 1996.
27. Lichtenstein JE, Madewell JE, McMeekin RR, Madewell JE. The role of radiology in fatality investigations. Am J Roentgen 150:751-755, 1988.
28. Ubelaker DH, Jacobs CH. Identification of orthopedic device manufacturer. J Forensic Sci 40:168-170, 1995.
29. Bennett JL, Benedix DC. Positive identification of cremains recovered from an automobile based on presence of an intemal fixation device. J Forensic Sci 44:1296-1298, 1999.
30. Sudimack JR, Lewis BJ, Rich J, Dean DE, Fardal PM. Identification of decomposed human remains from radiographic comparisons of an unusual foot deformity. J Forensic Sci 47:218-220, 2002.
31. Singleton AC. The roentgenological identification of victims of the "Noronic" disaster. Am J Roentgenol Radiat Ther 66:375-384, 1951.
32. Brown TC, Delaney RJ, Robinson WL. Medical identification in the "Noronic" disaster. JAMA 148:621-627, 1952.
33. Simson LR Jr. Roentgenography in the human factors investigation of fatal aviation accidents. Aerosp Med 43:81-85, 1972.
34. Mason JK. Reconstruction of a fatal aircraft accident from medical findings. Proc R Soc Med 61:1079-1084, 1968.
35. Krefft S. Who was at the aircraft's controls when the fatal accident occurred? Aerosp Med 41:785-789, 1970.
36. Horne JG, Mowbray M. Ankle and foot injuries in an aircraft crash. Foot Ankle 1:110-111, 1980.
37. Mann RW, Holland TD. Perimortem calcaneal and talar fractures sustained in a military crash in Vietnam. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 88:446-450, 1998.
38. Coltart WD. Aviator's astragulus. J Bone Joint Surg 34B:545-566, 1952.
39. Penny JN, Davis LA. Fractures and fracture-dislocations of the neck of the talus. J Trauma 20:1029-1037, 1980.