Attribution of foot bones to sex and population groups

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 186-195

  Smith, Shelley L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

forensic anthropology; forensic science; human identification; metatarsals; phalanges; physical anthropology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOOT; FORENSIC SCIENCE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METATARSAL BONE; PHALANX; PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DETERMINATION;

EID: 0031041809     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1520/jfs14097j     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Krogman VVM, Ijcan MY, The human skeleton in forensic medicine. 2nd edition. Springfield (IL): Charles C Thomas, 1986.
2. Giles E, Vallandigham PH. Height estimation from foot and shoeprint length. J Forensic Sei 1991:36:1134-51.
3. Gordon CC, Buikstra JE. Linear models for the prediction of stature from foot and boot dimensions. J Forensic Sei 1992;37:77I-82.
4. Byers S, Akoshima K, Curran B. Determination of adult stature from metatarsal length. Am J Phys Anthropol 1989;79:275-9.
5. Steele DG. The estimation of sex on the basis of the talus and calcaneus. Am J Phys Anthropol 1976;45:581-8.
6. Smith SL. Attribution of hand bones to sex and population groups. J Forensic Sei 1996;41:469-77.
7. Martin R, Salier K. Lehrbuch der anthropologie. Volume l, 3rd edition. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer, 1957.
8. Bass WM. Human osteology. A laboratory and field manual. 3rd edition. Columbia (MO): Missouri Archaeological Society, 1987.
9. Steele DG, Bramblett CA. The anatomy and biology of the human skeleton. College Station (TX): Texas A & M Press, 1988.
10. White TD, Folkens PA. Human osteology. San Diego: Academic Press, 1991.
11. Norusis MJ. SPSS/PC+ advanced statistics™ 4.0 for the IBM PC/ XT/AT and PS/2. Chicago:SPSS, 1990.
12. Klecka WR. Discriminant analysis. Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07-019. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications, 1980.
13. DiBennardo R. The use and interpretation of common computer implementations of discriminant function analysis. In: Reichs KJ, editor. Forensic osteology: Advances in the identification of human remains. Springfield (IL): Charles C Thomas, 1986;171-95.
14. Meadows L, Jantz RL. Allometric secular change in the long bones from the 1800s to the present. J Forensic Sei 1995:40:762-7.