Helping journalists get it right: A physician's guide to improving health care reporting

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 138-145

  Stamm, Karen ^a   Williams Jr , John W ^b,c   Hitchcock Noël, Polly ^a,d   Rubin, Rita ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d SOUTH TEXAS VETERANS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^e Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr S A ^*

Author keywords

Communication; Health education; Journalism; Mass media; Medical; Physicians

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MASS MEDIUM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RELIABILITY; REVIEW;

HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; MASS MEDIA; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RESEARCH; TELEVISION;

EID: 0344453814     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20220.x     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Moynihan R, Bero L, Ross-Degnan D, et al. Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342:1645-50.
2. Goldberg JP, Hellwig JP. Nutrition research in the media: the challenge facing scientists. J Am Coll Nutr. 1997;16:544-50.
3. Molitor F. Accuracy in science news reporting by newspapers: the case of aspirin for the prevention of heart attacks. Health Commun. 1993;5:209-24.
4. Shuchman M, Wilkes MS. Medical scientists and health news reporting: a case of miscommunication. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126:976-82.
5. Rubin R. Rogers HL Jr. Under the microscope: the relationship between physicians and the news media Nashville, Tenn: The Freedom Forum First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University; 1993.
6. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. Press releases: translating research into news. JAMA. 2002;287:2856-8.
7. de Semir V, Ribas C, Revuelta G. Press releases of science journal articles and subsequent newspaper stories on the same topic. JAMA. 1998;280:294-5.
8. Brody JE. The challenges of accurate health reporting [speech]. University of Minnesota School of Public Health. Dec. 1, 2000. Available from: URL: http://www.ahcj.umn.edu/files/brodyspeech.pdf.
9. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Baczek L. Media coverage of scientific meetings: too much, too soon? JAMA. 2002;287:2859-63.
10. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC, Welch HG. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:966-72.
11. Sheridan SL, Pignone M. Numeracy and the medical student's ability to interpret data. Eff Clin Pract. 9002;5:35-40.
12. Kirsch IS, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A. Adult Literacy in America, Washington, D.C.: Office of Education Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education: 1993.
13. Budescu DF, Wallsten TS. Processing linguistic probabilities: general principles and empirical evidence. In: Busemeyer JR, Hastie R, Medlin DL, eds. Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective. New York: Academic Press; 1995:275-318.
14. Merz JF, Druzdzel MJ, Mazur DJ. Verbal expressions of probability in informed consent litigation. Med Decis Making. 1991;11: 273-81.
15. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians' referrals for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:279-83.
16. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Risk communication in clinical practice: putting cancer in context. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999;25:124-33.
17. Lang TA, Secic M. How to report statistics in medicine: annotated guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians; 1997.
18. Zhang J, Yu KF, What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998; 280:1690-1.
19. Davies HT, Crombie IK, Tavakoli M. When can odds ratios mislead? BMJ. 1998;316:989-91.
20. Farberman RK. What the media need from news sources. In: Schwartz LL. ed. Psychology and the Media: A Second Look, 1st ed. Washington. DC: American Psychological Association: 1999:9-23.
21. Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review-Part 1. Lancet. 1996;347:1382-6.
22. Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review-Part 2. Lancet. 1996;347:1459-63.
23. Kassirer JP, Angell M. Prepublication release of Journal articles. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1762-3.
24. Gross CP. Steiner CA, Bass EB, Powe NR. Relation between prepublication release of clinical trial results and the practice of carotid endarterectomy. JAMA. 2000;284:2886-93.
25. Phillips DP. Kanter EJ, Bednarczyk B, Tastad PL. Importance of the lay press in the transmission of medical knowledge to the scientific community. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1180-3.
26. Broder DS. Behind the Front Page: A Candid Look at How News Is Made. 1st Touchstone ed. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1988.
27. Jordan DL. Newspaper effects on policy preferences. Public Opin Q. 1993;57:191-204.
28. Otten AL. The influence of the mass media on health policy. Health Aff (Millwood). 1992;11:111-8.
29. Kennedy GE, Bero LA. Print media coverage of research on passive smoking. Tob Control. 1999;8:254-60.
30. Warner KE. Cigarette advertising and media coverage of smoking and health. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:384-8.
31. Logan RA. Three opportunities to work with the news media. Arthritis Care Res. 1998;11:53-9.
32. Wellman NS, Scarbrough FE, Ziegler RG, Lyle B. Do we facilitate the scientific process and the development of dietary guidance when findings from single studies are publicized? An American Society for Nutritional Sciences controversy session report. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:802-5.