Prediction of catalytic residues in enzymes based on known tertiary structure, stability profile, and sequence conservation

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 327, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1053-1064

  Ota, Motonori ^a,b   Kinoshita, Kengo ^c   Nishikawa, Ken ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENETICS   (Japan)

^b TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^c YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

3D profile; Desolvation; Hypothetical protein; K nearest neighbor; Structural genomics

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; ENZYME; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME ANALYSIS; ENZYME MECHANISM; ENZYME STABILITY; ENZYME STRUCTURE; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0344405703     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00207-9     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Zvelebil M., Sternberg M. Analysis and prediction of the location of catalytic residues in enzymes. Protein Eng. 2:1988;127-138.
2. Casari G., Sander C., Valencia A. A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nature Struct. Biol. 2:1995;171-178.
3. Lichtarge O., Bourne H., Cohen F. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 257:1996;342-358.
4. Hannenhalli S., Russell R. Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignments. J. Mol. Biol. 303:2001;61-76.
5. Armon A., Graur D., Ben-Tal N. ConSurf: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of phylogenetic information. J. Mol. Biol. 307:2001;447-463.
6. Simon A.L., Stone E.A., Sidow A. Inference of functional regions in proteins by quantification of evolutionary constraints. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;2912-2917.
7. Aloy P., Querol E., Aviles F., Sternberg M. Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins: applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein docking. J. Mol. Biol. 311:2001;395-408.
8. Meiering E.M., Serrano L., Fersht A.R. Effect of active site residues in barnase on activity and stability. J. Mol. Biol. 225:1992;585-589.
9. Yutani K., Ogasahara K., Tsujita T., Kanemoto K., Matsumoto M., Tanaka S., et al. Tryptophan synthase alpha subunit glutamic acid 49 is essential for activity. Studies with 19 mutants at position 49. J. Biol. Chem. 262:1987;13429-13433.
10. Yutani K., Ogasawara K., Tsujita T., Sugino Y. Dependence of conformational stability on hydrophobicity of the amino acid residue in a series of variant proteins substituted at a unique position of tryptophan synthase alpha subunit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 84:1987;4441-4444.
11. Shoichet B., Baase W., Kuroki R., Matthews B. A relationship between protein stability and protein function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 92:1995;452-456.
12. Ota M., Isogai Y., Nishikawa K. Structural requirement of highly-conserved residues in globins. FEBS Letters. 415:1997;129-133.
13. Ota M., Kanaya S., Nishikawa K. Desk-top analysis of the structural stability of various point mutations introduced into ribonuclease H. J. Mol. Biol. 248:1995;733-738.
14. Ota M., Isogai Y., Nishikawa K. Knowledge-based potential defined for a rotamer library to design protein sequences. Protein Eng. 14:2001;557-564.
15. Sheinerman F.B., Norel R., Honig B. Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:2000;153-159.
16. Elcock A. Prediction of functionally important residues based solely on the computed energetics of protein structure. J. Mol. Biol. 312:2001;885-896.
17. Laskowski R., Luscombe N., Swindells M., Thornton J. Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. Protein Sci. 5:1996;2438-2452.
18. Burley S.K., Almo S.C., Bonanno J.B., Capel M., Chance M.R., Gaasterland T., et al. Structural genomics: beyond the human genome project. Nature Genet. 23:1999;151-157.
19. Brenner S.E., Levitt M. Expectations from structural genomics. Protein Sci. 9:2000;197-200.
20. Altschul S., Madden T., Schaffer A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl. Acids Res. 25:1997;3389-3402.
21. Bairoch A., Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucl. Acids Res. 28:2000;45-48.
22. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl. Acids Res. 22:1994;4673-4680.
23. Taylor W. The classification of amino acid conservation. J. Theor. Biol. 119:1986;205-218.
24. Zvelebil M.J., Barton G.J., Taylor W.R., Sternberg M.J. Prediction of protein secondary structure and active sites using the alignment of homologous sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 195:1987;957-961.
25. Ota M., Nishikawa K. Assessment of the pseudo-energy potential by the best-five test: a new use of the three-dimensional profiles of proteins. Protein Eng. 10:1997;339-351.
26. Nakamura H., Nishida S. Numerical calculations of electrostatic potentials of protein-solvent systems by the self consistent boundary method. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 56:1987;1609-1622.
27. Nagano N., Ota M., Nishikawa K. Strong hydrophobic nature of cysteine residues in proteins. FEBS Letters. 458:1999;69-71.
28. Yi T., Lander E. Protein secondary structure prediction using nearest-neighbor methods. J. Mol. Biol. 232:1993;1117-1129.
29. Salamov A., Solovyev V. Prediction of protein secondary structure by combining nearest-neighbor algorithms and multiple sequence alignments. J. Mol. Biol. 247:1995;11-15.
30. Berman H., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T., Weissig H., et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucl. Acids Res. 28:2000;235-242.
31. Shin D., Yokota H., Kim R., Kim S. Crystal structure of conserved hypothetical protein Aq1575 from Aquifexaeolicus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;7980-7985.
32. Shimizu T., Vassylyev D., Kido S., Doi Y., Morikawa K. Crystal structure of vitelline membrane outer layer protein I (VMO-I): a folding motif with homologous Greek key structures related by an internal three-fold symmetry. EMBO J. 13:1994;1003-1010.
33. Murzin A.G., Brenner S.E., Hubbard T., Chothia C. Scop: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247:1995;536-540.
34. Hegyi H., Gerstein M. The relationship between protein structure and function: a comprehensive survey with application to the yeast genome. J. Mol. Biol. 288:1999;147-164.
35. Russell R., Sasieni P., Sternberg M. Supersites within superfolds. Binding site similarity in the absence of homology. J. Mol. Biol. 282:1998;903-918.
36. Osterman A., Brooks H., Jackson L., Abbott J., Phillips M. Lysine-69 plays a key role in catalysis by ornithine decarboxylase through acceleration of the Schiff base formation, decarboxylation, and product release steps. Biochemistry. 38:1999;11814-11826.
37. Kido S., Doi Y., Kim F., Morishita E., Narita H., Kanaya S., et al. Characterization of vitelline membrane outer layer protein I, VMO-I: amino acid sequence and structural stability. J. Biochem. (Tokyo). 117:1995;1183-1191.
38. Shimizu T., Morikawa K. The beta-prism: a new folding motif. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21:1996;3-6.
39. Holm L., Sander C. Mapping the protein universe. Science. 273:1996;595-602.
40. Lee X., Thompson A., Zhang Z., Ton-that H., Biesterfeldt J., Ogata C., et al. Structure of the complex of Maclura pomifera agglutinin and the T-antigen disaccharide, Galbeta1,3GalNAc. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1998;6312-6318.
41. Ding C., Dubchak I. Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks. Bioinformatics. 17:2001;349-358.
42. Hakansson K., Wehnert A. Structure of cobalt carbonic anhydrase complexed with bicarbonate. J. Mol. Biol. 228:1992;1212-1218.
43. Stewart L., Bailey S., Bennett B., Charnock J., Garner C., McAlpine A. Dimethylsulfoxide reductase: an enzyme capable of catalysis with either molybdenum or tungsten at the active site. J. Mol. Biol. 299:2000;593-600.
44. 2+ ion. Proposal of a novel catalytic role for Glu48. J. Biol. Chem. 271:1996;32729-32736.
45. Ooi T., Oobatake M., Nemethy G., Scheraga H. Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 84:1987;3086-3090.
46. Matsuo Y., Nakamura H., Nishikawa K. Detection of protein 3D-1D compatibility characterized by the evaluation of side-chain packing and electrostatic interactions. J. Biochem. (Tokyo). 118:1995;137-148.
47. Miyazawa S., Jernigan R.L. Protein stability for single substitution mutants and the extent of local compactness in the denatured state. Protein Eng. 7:1994;1209-1220.
48. Gilis D., Rooman M. Predicting protein stability changes upon mutation using database-derived potentials: solvent accessibility determines the importance of local versus non-local interactions along the sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 272:1997;276-290.
49. Connolly M. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science. 221:1983;709-713.
50. Cornell W., Cieplak P., Bayly C., Gould I., Merz K.J., Ferguson D., et al. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins and nucleic acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117:1995;5179-5197.
51. Kinoshita K., Furui J., Nakamura H. Identification of protein functions from a molecular surface database, eF-site. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics. 2:2001;9-22.
52. Kraulis P.J. MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallog. 24:1991;946-950.
53. ® 10.0J.