Concurrent Partnerships among Rural African Americans with Recently Reported Heterosexually Transmitted HIV Infection

Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 423-429

  Adimora, Adaora A ^a,b   Schoenbach, Victor J ^b   Martinson, Francis E A ^a   Donaldson, Kathryn H ^a   Stancil, Tonya R ^a   Fullilove, Robert E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b IL   (United States)

^c UNC School of Medicine ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

African Americans; Concurrent partnerships; Heterosexual transmission; HIV; Sexual behavior

Indexed keywords

COCAINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HETEROSEXUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS PREVALENCE; INFECTION RATE; INFECTION RISK; INTERVIEW; JUVENILE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASCULINITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEGRO; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; VIRUS TRANSMISSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGE FACTORS; DISEASE TRANSMISSION, HORIZONTAL; FEMALE; HETEROSEXUALITY; HIV INFECTIONS; HIV-1; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NORTH CAROLINA; RISK FACTORS; RURAL POPULATION; SEX FACTORS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL PARTNERS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 0344393492     PISSN: 15254135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00126334-200312010-00010     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Rep. 2001:1-33.
2. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ. Contextual factors and the black-white disparity in heterosexual HIV transmission. Epidemiology. 2002;13:707-712.
3. Adimora A, Schoenbach V, Bonas D, et al. Concurrent sexual partnerships among women in the United States. Epidemiology. 2002;13:320-327.
4. Klovdahl AS, Potterat JJ, Woodhouse DE, et al. Social networks and infectious disease: the Colorado Springs study. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:79-88.
5. Friedman SR, Aral S. Social networks, risk-potential networks, health, and disease. J Urban Health. 2001;78:411-418.
6. Ghani AC, Swinton J, Garnett GP. The role of sexual partnership networks in the epidemiology of gonorrhea. Sex Transm Dis. 1997;24:45-56.
7. Rothenberg R, Narramore J. The relevance of social network concepts to sexually transmitted disease control. Sex Transm Dis. 1996;23:24-29.
8. Garnett GP, Hughes JP, Anderson RM, et al. Sexual mixing patterns of patients attending sexually transmitted diseases clinics. Sex Transm Dis. 1996;23:248-257.
9. Rothenberg RB, Sterk C, Toomey KE, et al. Using social network and ethnographic tools to evaluate syphilis transmission. Sex Transm Dis. 1998;25:154-160.
10. Aral SO, Hughes J, Stoner B, et al. Sexual mixing patterns in the spread of gonococcal and chlamydial infections. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:825-833.
11. Aral SO. Sexual network patterns as determinants of STD rates: paradigm shift in the behavioral epidemiology of STDs made visible. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:262-264.
12. Anderson R, Gupta S, Ng W. The significance of sexual partner contact networks for the transmission dynamics of HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1990;3:417-429.
13. Laumann EO, Youm Y. Racial/ethnic group differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: a network explanation. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:250-261.
14. Morris M, Kretzschmar M. Concurrent partnerships and transmission dynamics in networks. Soc Networks. 1995;17:299-318.
15. Anderson RM. Transmission dynamics of sexually transmitted infections. In: Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 3rd ed. Edited by Holmes KK, Mardh PA, Sparling PF, et al. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999.
16. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson FEA, et al. Concurrent sexual partnerships among African Americans in the rural South. Ann Epidemiol. (in press)
17. Manhart LE, Aral SO, Holmes KK, et al. Sex partner concurrency: measurement, prevalence, and correlates among urban 18-39-year-olds. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:133-143.
18. Pulerwitz J, Izazola-Licea J-A, Gortmaker S. Extrarelational sex among Mexican men and their partners' risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1650-1652.
19. Koumans E, Farley T, Gibson J, et al. Characteristics of persons with syphilis in areas of persisting syphilis in the United States: sustained transmission associated with concurrent partnerships. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28:497-503.
20. Gorbach PM, Stoner BP, Aral SO, et al. "It takes a village": understanding concurrent sexual partnerships in Seattle, Washington. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:453-462.
21. Berry DE. The emerging epidemiology of rural AIDS. J Rural Health. 1993;9:293-304.
22. Thomas JC, Schoenbach VJ, Weiner DH, et al. Rural gonorrhea in the southeastern United States: a neglected epidemic? Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:269-277.
23. Schwarcz SK, Bolan GA, Fullilove M, et al. Crack cocaine and the exchange of sex for money or drugs: risk factors for gonorrhea among black adolescents in San Francisco. Sex Transm Dis. 1992;19:7-13.
24. Warnecke RB, Sudman S, Johnson TP, et al. Cognitive aspects of recalling and reporting health-related events: Papanicolaou smears, clinical breast examinations, and mammograms. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146:982-992.
25. O'Reilly KR, Piot P. International perspectives on individual and community approaches to the prevention of sexually transmitted disease and human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis. 1996;174: S214-S222.
26. Krueger LE, Wood RW, Diehr PH, et al. Poverty and HIV seropositivity: the poor are more likely to be infected. AIDS. 1990;4:811-814.
27. Farmer P. Infections and Inequalities. The Modern Plagues, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 1999.
28. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson FE, et al. Social context of sexual relationships among rural African Americans. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28:69-76.
29. Janssen RS, Holtgrave DR, Valdiserri RO, et al. The serostatus approach to fighting the HIV epidemic: prevention strategies for infected individuals. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1019-1024.