How can multi-site evaluations be participatory?

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 471-482

  Lawrenz, Frances ^a   Huffman, Douglas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344392708     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ameval.2003.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Baizerman, M., Compton, D., & Stockdill, S. (2002). New directions for ECB. In D. Compton, M. Baizerman, & S. Stockdill (Eds.), The art, craft, and science of evaluation capacity building (pp. 109-120). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. New Directions for Evaluation, 93.
2. Boruch, R. (1991). Sharing confidential and sensitive data. In J. E. Sieber (Ed.), Sharing social science data: Advantages and challenges. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Burke, B. (1998). Evaluating for a change: Reflections on participatory methodology. In E. Whitmore (Ed.), Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation (pp. 43-56). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. New Directions for Evaluation, 80.
4. Cook, J., Carey, M., Razzano, L., Burke, J., & Blyler, C. (2002). The pioneer: The employment intervention demonstration program. In J. Herrell & R. Straw (Eds.), Conducting multiple site evaluations in real-world settings (pp. 31-44). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. New Directions for Evaluation, 94.
5. Cousins, J., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. In E. Whitmore (Ed.), Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation (pp. 5-24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. New Directions for Evaluation, 80.
6. Fetterman D. Empowerment evaluation: A response to Patton and Scriven Evaluation Practice 18 1997 253-266
7. Feuer M. Towne L. Shavelson R. Scientific culture and educational research Educational Researcher 318 2002 4-14
8. Hamilton L. McCaffrey D. Stecher B. Klein S. Bobyn A. Bugliari D. Studying large-scale reforms of instructional practice: An example from mathematics and science Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 251 2003 1-29
9. King, J. (1998). Making sense of participatory evaluation practice. In E. Whitmore (Ed.), Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation (pp. 57-68). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. New Directions for Evaluation, 80.
10. Leff, H., & Mulkern, V. (2002). Lessons learned about science and participation from multisite evaluations. In J. Herrell & R. Straw (Eds.), Conducting multiple site evaluations in real-world settings (pp. 89-100). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. New Directions for Evaluation, 94.
11. Mowbray, C., & Herman, S. (1991). Using multiple sites in mental health evaluations: Focus on program theory and implementation issues. In R. Turpin & J. Sinacore (Eds.), Multisite evaluations (pp. 45-58). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. New Directions for Evaluation, 50.
12. Nightingale D., & Rossman S. (1994). Managing field data collection from start to finish. In J. Wholey, H. Hatry, & K. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 350-373). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Patton, M. (1997a). Utilization-focused evaluation (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Patton M. Of vacuum cleaners and toolboxes: A response to Fetterman's response Evaluation Practice 18 1997b 267-270
15. Scriven M. Comments on Fetterman's response Evaluation Practice 18 1997 271-272
16. Sinacore, J., & Turpin, R. (1991). Multiple sites in evaluation research: A survey of organizational and methodological issues. In R. Turpin & J. Sinacore (Eds.), Multisite evaluations (pp. 5-18). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. New Directions for Evaluation, 50.
17. Straw, R., & Herrell, J. (2002). A framework for understanding and improving multi-site evaluations. In J. Herrell & R. Straw (Eds.), Conducting multiple site evaluations in real-world settings (pp. 5-16). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. New Directions for Evaluation, 94.
18. Stufflebeam D. Empowerment evaluation, objectivist evaluation and evaluation standards: Where the future of evaluation should not go and where it needs to go Evaluation Practice 15 1994 321-338
19. Whitmore, E. (1998). Final commentary. In E. Whitmore (Ed.), Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation (pp. 95-99). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. New Directions for Evaluation, 80.