Surface runoff in urban catchments: Morphological identification of unit hydrographs from urban databanks

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 283, Issue 1-4, 2003, Pages 146-168

  Rodriguez, Fabrice ^a,c   Andrieu, Hervé ^a   Creutin, Jean Dominique ^b  

^a Invest Lab Ctrl Ponts Chaussees   (France)

^b OBSERVATOIRE DE GRENOBLE   (France)

^c Lab Ctrl Ponts Div Eau Chaussees   (France)

Author keywords

Geographical information system; Storm drainage; Travel time; Unit hydrograph; Urban databank

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; CHANNEL FLOW; MORPHOLOGY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; RAIN; SEWERS; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

HYDROGRAPHS;

RUNOFF;

CATCHMENT; DRAINAGE WATER; FLOW VELOCITY; HYDROGRAPH; RUNOFF; URBAN AREA;

EID: 0344152348     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00246-4     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Belhadj, N., Joannis, C., Raimbault, G., 1995. Modelling of rainfall induced infiltration into separate sewerage. Water Science and Technology 32 (1), 161-168.
2. Berthier, E., Andrieu, H., Rodriguez, F., 1999. The Rezé urban catchments database. Water Resources Research 35 (6), 1915-1919.
3. Berthier, E., Andrieu, H., Creutin, J.D., Raimbault, G., 2003. The role of soil in the generation of flow rates in urban areas. Submitted for publication.
4. Chocat, B., 1997. Encyclopédie de l'hydrologie urbaine et de l'assainissement, Eurydice '92, Techniques et Documentation, Lavoisier, Paris (in French),.
5. Chutha, P., Dooge, J.C.I., 1990. The shape parameters of the geomorphological unit hydrograph. Journal of Hydrology 117, 81-97.
6. Danish Hydraulic Institute, 1998. MOUSE version 4.01, User Manuel and Tutorial, Danish Hydraulic Institute, Hoersholm, Denmark.
7. Djokic, D., Maidment, D.R., 1991. Terrain analysis for urban stormwater modelling. Hydrological Processes 5, 115-124.
8. Duband, D., Obled, C., Rodriguez, J., 1993. Unit hydrograph revisited: an alternative approach to UH and effective precipitation identification. Journal of Hydrology 150 (1), 115-150.
9. Freer, J., Beven, K.J., Ambroise, B., 1996. Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: an application of the GLUE approach. Water Resources Research 32 (7), 2161-2173.
10. Garçon, R., 1999. Overland rain-flow model for flood forecasting and pre-determination. La Houille Blanche 7/8, 88-95.in French, with English Abstract.
11. Graf, W.H., 1993. Hydraulique Fluviale. Tome 1. Ecoulement permanent uniforme et non uniforme, Traité de Génie civil de l'EPFL, Lausanne (in French), vol. 16.
12. Grayman, W.M., Males, R.M., Harris, J.J., 1982. Use of integrated spatial data and modeling capabilities for urban runoff analyses, International Symposium on Urban Hydrology, Hydraulics and Sediment Control, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA, pp. 249-256.
13. Greene, R.G., Cruise, J.F., 1995. Urban watershed modeling using GIS. Journal of water resources planning and management 121 (4), 318-325.
14. Guo, J.C.Y., 1997. Street hydraulics and inlet sizing. Using the computer model UDINLET, Water Resources Publications, LLC, Highlands Ranch (Colorado).
15. Gupta, V., Waymire, E., Wang, C., 1980. A representation of an instantaneous unit hydrograph from geomorphology. Journal of Hydrology 16 (5), 855-862.
16. Gupta, V.K., Waymire, E., 1998. Spatial variability and scale invariance in hydrologic regionalization, scale dependence and scale invariance in hydrology, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 83-135.
17. Huber, W., Dickinson, R., 1988. Storm water management model, Version 4, User's Manual. Report No EPA/600/3-88/001a, US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia, USA.
18. Jakeman, A.J., Hornberger, G.M., 1993. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model? Water Resources Research 29 (8), 2637-2649.
19. Kirkby, M.J., 1993. Network hydrology and geomorphology. In: Beven, K., Kirkby, M.J. (Eds.), Channel Network Hydrology, Wiley, New York, pp. 1-12.
20. Laurini, R., 2001. Information systems for urban planning. (A hypermedia co-operative approach), Taylor and Francis, London.
21. Linsley, R., Kohler, M., Paulhus, L., 1975. Hydrology for Engineers, Mc Graw Hill, New York.
22. Loague, K.M., Freeze, R.A., 1985. A comparison of rainfall-runoff modeling techniques on small upland catchments. Water Resources Research 21 (2), 229-248.
23. Luce, C.H., Cundy, T.W., 1994. Parameter identification for a runoff model for forest roads. Water Resources Research 30, 1057-1069.
24. Lynch, K., 1960. The Image of the City, MIT Press, Cambridge.
25. Maidment, D.R., Olivera, F., Calver, A., Eatherall, A., Fraczek, W., 1996. Unit hydrograph derived from a spatially distributed velocity field. Hydrological Processes 10(6), 831-844.
26. Mosini, M.L., Rodriguez, F., Andrieu, H., 2000. Propriétés statistiques de la réponse hydrologique d'un bassin versant urbanisé. Application au site expérimental de Rezé. Bulletin des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées 228, 102-110.in French.
27. Moussa, R., 1997. Geomorphological transfer function calculated from digital elevation models for distributed hydrological modelling. Hydrological Processes 11 (5), 429-449.
28. Moussa, R., Voltz, M., Andrieux, P., 2002. Effects of the spatial organization of agricultural management on the hydrological behaviour of a farmed catchment during flood events. Hydrological Processes 16 (2), 393-412.
29. Nash, J., Sutcliffe, J., 1970. River flow forcasting through conceptual models. Part I: a discussion of principle. Journal of Hydrology 10 (3), 282-290.
30. Obled, C., 1991. Reflections on rainfall information requirements for operational rainfall-runoff modelling. In: Cluckie, I.D., Collier, C.G. (Eds.), Hydrological applications of weather radar, Proceedings of the International Symposium (University of Salford, August 1989), Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, pp. 469-482.
31. Olivera, F., Maidment, D., 1999. Geographic information systems (GIS)-based spatially distributed model for runoff routing. Water Resources Research 35 (4), 1155-1164.
32. Pilgrim, D.H., Cordery, I., 1993. Flood runoff. In: Maidment, D.R., (Ed.), Handbook of Hydrology, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, Chapter 9.
33. Rao, N.S.L., Delleur, J.W., Sarma, B.S.P., 1972. Conceptual hydrologic models for urbanizing basins. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE 98, 1205-1220.
34. Rodriguez, F., Andrieu, H., Zech, Y., 2000. Evaluation of a distributed model for urban catchments using a 7 years continuous data series. Hydrological Processes 14 (5), 899-914.
35. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Valdes, J., 1979. The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response. Water Resources Research 15 (6), 1409-1420.
36. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Rinaldo, A., 1997. Fractal River Basins, Chance and Self-Organisation, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
37. Saulnier, G.-M., Beven, K., Obled, C., 1997. Including spatially variable effective soil depths in TOPMODEL. Journal of Hydrology 202, 158-172.
38. Shamseldin, A.Y., Nash, J.E., 1998. The geomorphological unit hydrograph - a critical review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2 (1), 1-8.
39. Singh, V.P., 1992. Elementary Hydrology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ,.
40. Sivapalan, M., Jothityangkoon, C., Menabde, M., 2002. Linearity and nonlinearity of basin response as a function of scale: discussion of alternative definitions. Water Resources Research 38 (2), 4.1-4.5.
41. Smith, M.B., Brilly, M., 1992. Automated grid element ordering for GIS-based overland flow modeling. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote sensing 58 (5), 579-585.
42. Stedinger, J.R., Vogel, R.M., Foufoula-Georgiou, E., 1993. Frequency analysis of extreme events. In: Maidment, D.R., (Ed.), Handbook of Hydrology, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, Chapter 18.
43. Sui, D.Z., 1998. GIS-based urban modelling: practices, problems, and prospects. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12 (7), 651-671.
44. Urbonas, B.R., Roesner, L.A., 1993. Hydrologic design for urban drainage and flood control. In: Maidment, D.R., (Ed.), Handbook of Hydrology, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, Chapter 28.
45. Zech, Y., Sillen, X., Debources, C., Hauwaert, A.V., 1994. Rainfall Runoff modelling of partly urbanized watersheds. Comparison between a distributed model using GIS and other models. Sensitivity analysis. Water Science and Technology 29 (1-2), 163-170.