Some remarks on indestructibility and Hamkins' lottery preparation

Archive for Mathematical Logic

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 717-735

  Apter, Arthur W ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Indestructibility; Lottery preparation; Non reflecting stationary set of ordinals; Strong cardinal; Strongly compact cardinal; Supercompact cardinal

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344120295     PISSN: 09335846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00153-003-0181-3     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Apter, A.: A note on strong compactness and resurrectibility. Fundamenta Mathematicae 165, 285-290 (2000)
2. Apter, A.: Aspects of strong compactness, measurability, and indestructibility. Arch. Math. Logic 41, 705-719 (2002)
3. Apter, A.: Indestructibility and strong compactness. in preparation.
4. Apter, A.: Laver indestructibility and the class of compact cardinals. J. Symbolic Logic 63, 149-157 (1998)
5. Apter, A.: Strong cardinals can be fully Laver indestructible. Math. Logic Quarterly 48, 499-507 (2002)
6. Apter, A.: Strong compactness, measurability, and the class of supercompact cardinals. Fundamenta Mathematicae 167, 65-78 (2001)
7. Apter, A., Cummings, J.: Identity crises and strong compactness II: Strong cardinals. Arch. Math. Logic 40, 25-38 (2001)
8. Apter, A., Gitik, M.: The least measurable can be strongly compact and indestructible. J. Symbolic Logic 63, 1404-1412 (1998)
9. Apter, A., Hamkins, J.D.: Exactly controlling the non-supercompact strongly compact cardinals. To appear in the J. Symbolic Logic.
10. Apter, A., Hamkins, J.D.: Universal indestructibility. Kobe J. Math. 16, 119-130 (1999)
11. Burgess, J.: Forcing. In: J. Barwise, editor, Handbook of Mathematical Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 403-452 (1977)
12. Cummings, J.: A model in which GCH holds at successors but fails at limits. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 329, 1-39 (1992)
13. Felgner, U.: Comparison of the axioms of local and universal choice. Fundamenta Mathematicae 71, 62-73 (1971)
14. Foreman, M.: More saturated ideals. In: Cabal Seminar 79-81, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1019, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1-27 (1983)
15. Gitik, M.: All uncountable cardinals can be singular. Israel J. Math. 35, 61-88 (1980)
16. Gitik, M., Shelah, S.: On certain indestructibility of strong cardinals and a question of Hajnal. Arch. Math. Logic 28, 35-42 (1989)
17. Hamkins, J.D.: A class of strong diamond principles. Submitted for publication to Ann. Pure and Applied Logic.
18. Hamkins, J.D.: Destruction or preservation as you like it. Ann. Pure and Applied Logic 91, 191-229 (1998)
19. Hamkins, J.D.: Gap forcing. Israel J. Math. 125, 237-252 (2001)
20. Hamkins, J.D.: Gap forcing: Generalizing the Lévy-Solovay Theorem. Bull. Symbolic Logic 5, 264-272 (1999)
21. Hamkins, J.D.: The lottery preparation. Ann. Pure and Applied Logic 101, 103-146 (2000)
22. Kanamori, A.: The higher infinite. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York (1994)
23. Kimchi, Y., Magidor, M.: The independence between the concepts of compactness and supercompactness. Circulated manuscript.
24. Laver, R.: Making the supercompactness of κ indestructible under κ-directed closed forcing. Israel J. Math. 29, 385-388 (1978)
25. Martin, D.A., Steel, J.: A proof of projective determinacy. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 2, 71-125 (1989)
26. Solovay, R., Reinhardt, W., Kanamori, A.: Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings. Ann. Math. Logic 13, 73-116 (1978)