A note on strong compactness and resurrectibility

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Volumn 165, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 285-290

  Apter, Arthur W ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Indestructibility; Resurrectibility; Strongly compact cardinal; Supercompact cardinal

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039003869     PISSN: 00162736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. A. Apter, Aspects of strong compactness, measurability, and indestructibility, Arch. Math. Logic, submitted.
2. _, Laver indestructibility and the class of compact cardinals, J. Symbolic Logic 63 (1998), 149-157.
3. _, Patterns of compact cardinals, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 89 (1997), 101-115.
4. A. Apter and M. Gitik, The least measurable can be strongly compact and indestructible, J. Symbolic Logic 63 (1998), 1404-1412.
5. A. Apter and J. D. Hamkins, Universal indestructibility, Kobe J. Math. 16 (1999), 119-130.
6. A. Apter and S. Shelah, Menas' result is best possible, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 349 (1997), 2007-2034.
7. J. Cummings, A model in which GCH holds at successors but fails at limits, ibid. 329 (1992), 1-39.
8. J. D. Hamkins, Destruction or preservation as you like it, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 91 (1998), 191-229.
9. J. D. Hamkins, Gap forcing, Israel J. Math., to appear.
10. _, Gap forcing: generalizing the Lévy-Solovay theorem, Bull. Symbolic Logic 5 (1999), 264-272.
11. _, Small forcing makes any cardinal superdestructible, J. Symbolic Logic 63 (1998), 51-58.
12. _, The lottery preparation, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 101 (2000), 103-146.
13. R. Laver, Making the supercompactness of κ indestructible under κ-directed closed forcing, Israel J. Math. 29 (1978), 385-388.
14. A. Lévy and R. Solovay, Measurable cardinals and the continuum hypothesis, ibid. 5 (1967), 234-248.
15. T. Menas, On strong compactness and supercompactness, Ann. Math. Logic 7 (1974), 327-359.