Stand continuity - A useful parameter for ecological networks in post-mining landscapes

Ecological Engineering

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 287-296

  Sklenicka, Petr ^a   Charvatova, Eva ^a  

^a CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Czech Republic; Ecological network; Fragmentation; Post mining landscape; Rehabilitation; Stand continuity

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LAND USE; MINING;

ECOLOGICAL NETWORKS;

ECOLOGY;

ECOLOGICAL STABILITY; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; OPEN PIT MINE; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; STAND STRUCTURE;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 0344084281     PISSN: 09258574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8574(03)00053-3     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bell, L.C., 2001. Establishment of native ecosystems after mining - Australian experience across diverse biogeographic zones. Ecol. Eng. 17, 179-186.
2. Brandt, J., 1995. Ecological networks in Danish planning. Landschap 12, 63-76.
3. Bradshaw. A., 1997. Restoration of mined lands - using natural processes. Ecol. Eng. 8, 255-269.
4. Brown, V.K., Southwood, T.R.E., 1983. Trophic diversity, niche breadth, and generation times of exopterygote insects in a secondary succession. Oecologia 56, 220-225.
5. Bucek, A., Michal, I., 1990. Teoreticke zaklady ekologicke stability. In: Michal, I., Bucek, A., Löw, J. (Eds.), Uzemni zabezpecovani ekologicke stability. Teorie a praxe. Terplan, Praha, Czech Republic, pp. 151-164.
6. Burgess, R.L., Sharpe, D.M., 1981. Forest Islands Dynamic in Man-dominated Landscapes. Springer-Verlag, New York, 384 pp.
7. Burkhardt, R., Jaeger, U., Mirbach, E., Rothenburger, A., Schwab, G., 1995. Design of the habitat network of Rheinland-Pfalz State (Germany). Landschap 12, 99-110.
8. De Blust, G., Paelinckx, D., Kuijken, E., 1995. The green main structure for Flanders. Landschap 12, 89-98.
9. Forman, R.T.T., 1995. Land Mosaics. University Press, Cambridge, USA, 632 pp.
10. Forman, R.T.T., Godron, M., 1986. Landscape Ecology. Wiley, New York, 619 pp.
11. Hanski, I., 1999. Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos 87, 209-219.
12. Hüttl, R.F., Weber, E., 2001. Forest ecosystem development in post-mining landscapes: a case study of the Lusatian lignite district. Naturwissenschaften 88, 322-329.
13. Jongman, R.H.G., 1995. Nature conservation planning in Europe: developing ecological networks. Landsc. Urban Plan. 32, 169-183.
14. Jongman, R.H.G., Lipsky, Z., van den Aarsen, L.F.M., 1995. Ecological networks in Europe: strategies, criteria and perspectives. In: Schoute, J.F.T., et al. (Eds.), Scenario Studies for the Rural Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp. 513-524.
15. Kubes, J., 1996. Biocentres and corridors in a cultural landscape. A critical assessment of the "territorial system of ecological stability". Landsc. Urban Plan. 35, 231-240.
16. Lausch, A. Thulke, H.H., 2001. The analysis of spatio-temporal dynamics of landscape structures. In: Krönert, R., Steinhardt, U., Volk, M. (Eds.), Landscape Balance and Landscape Assessment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 113-136.
17. Löw, J., 1986. Zasady pro vymezovani a navrhovani uzemnich systemu ekologicke stability krajiny. Agroprojekt, Praha, Czech Republic, 223 pp.
18. Löw, J., 1995. Rukovet projektanta USES. Doplnek, Brno, Czech Republic, 285 pp.
19. Mc Clone, M.S., Duncan, R.P., Heenan, P.B., 2001. Endemism, species selection and the origin and distribution of the vascular plant flora of New Zealand. J. Biogeogr. 28, 199-216.
20. McDonald, D.B., Potts, W.K., Fitzpatrick, J.W., Woolfenden, G.E., 1999. Contrasting genetic structures in sister species of North American scrub-jays. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 266, 1117-1125.
21. Neel, M.C., Ellstrand, N.C., 2001. Patterns of allozyme diversity in the threatened plant Erigeron parishii (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 88, 810-818.
22. Norden, B., Appelqvist, T., 2001. Conceptual problems of ecological continuity and its bioindicators. Biodivers. Conserv. 10, 779-791.
23. Odum, E.P., 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology, third edition. Saunders, Philadelphia, USA, 574 pp.
24. Ohlson, M., Söderström, L., Hörnberg, G., Zackrisson, O., Hermansson, J., 1997. Habitat qualities versus long-term continuity as determinations of biodiversity in boreal olgrowth swamp forests. Biol. Conserv. 81, 221-231.
25. Opdam, P., 2002. Assessing the conservation potential of habitat networks. In: Gutzwiller, K.J. (Ed.), Applying Landscape Ecology in Biological Conservation. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 381-404.
26. Pahl-Wostl, C., 1990. Temporal organization: a new perspective on the ecological network. Oikos 58, 293-305.
27. Peterken, G.F., 1974. A method of assessing woodland flora for conservation using indicator species. Biol. Conserv. 6, 239-245.
28. Primack, R.B., 2000. A primer of conservation biology. Sinauer Assoc. Inc., Sunderland, MA, USA, 352 pp.
29. Sanchez-Lafuente, A.M., Valera, F., Godino, A., Muela, F., 2001. Natural and human-mediated factors in the recovery and subsequent expansion of the Purple swamphen Porphyrio L. (Rallidae) in the Iberian Peninsula. Biodivers. Conserv. 10, 851-867.
30. Segestrom, U., Bradshaw, R., Hornberg, G., Bohlin, E., 1994. Disturbance history of a swamp forest refuge in Northern Sweden. Biol. Conserv. 68, 189-196.
31. Selva, S.B., 1994. Lichen diversity and stand continuity in the northern hardwoods and spruce-fir forests of Northern New England and Western New Brunswick. Bryologist 97, 424-429.
32. Sepp, K., Palang, H., Mander, U., Kaasik, A., 1999. Prospects for nature and landscape protection in Estonia. Landsc. Urban Plan. 46, 161-167.
33. Sklenicka, P., Lhota, T., 2002aa. Landscape heterogeneity - the quantitative criterion for landscape reconstruction. Landsc. Urban Plan. 58, 147-156.
34. Sklenicka, P., Lhota, T., 2002bb. Verbesserte Landschaftsvielfalt nach Erneuerung einer Tagebau-Folgelandschaft. Landnutz. Landentwickl. 3, 128-134.
35. Sokolovska uhelna, 2002. Review of recultivated areas in the Sokolov brown coal basin (http://www.suas.cz).
36. Steffek, J., Haberova, I., Jancura, P., Jancurova, K., Janik, M., Koren, M., Kramarik, J., Kristin, A., Maglocky, S., Majzlan, O., Otahelova, H., Sabo, P., Straka, P., Soltes, R., Uhrin, M., 1995. Significance of the national ecological network of Slovakia for the European ecological network-EECONET. Ekol. Bratislava 14, 205-212.
37. Sverdrup-Thygeson. A., 2001. Can "continuity indicator species" predict richness or red-listed species of saproxylic beetles? Biodivers. Conserv. 10, 815-832.
38. Thor, G., 1998. Red-listed lichens in Sweden: habitats, threats, protection, and indicator value in boreal coniferous forests. Biodivers. Conserv. 7. 59-72.
39. Troumbis, A., 1995. Ecological networks in Greece. Current status, administration approaches and reserve initiatives. Landschap 12, 51-62.
40. Trpak, P., 2000. Restoration of Chabarovice Mining Site (North Bohemia). Final Report of Research Project VaV 640/98/03. Prague, Czech Republic.
41. Yahner, R.H., Mahan, C.G., 2002. Animal behaviour in fragmented landscapes. In: Gutzwiller, K.J. (Ed.), Applying Landscape Ecology in Biological Conservation. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 266-285.