The representation of shape in the context of visual object categorization tasks

NeuroImage

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 28-40

  Op De Beeck, Hans ^a   Béatse, Erik ^b   Wagemans, Johan ^a   Sunaert, Stefan ^b   Van Hecke, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 0343628871     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0598     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychol. Rev. 94:1987;115-147.
2. Bruyer R. Les agnosies visuelles [visual agnosia]. Seron X., Jeannerod M. Neuropsychologie Humaine. 1994;179-204 Mardaga, Liège.
3. Corbetta M. Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: Identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998;831-838.
4. Dolan R. J., Fink G. R., Rolls E., Booth M., Holmes A., Frackowiak R. S. J., Friston K. J. How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context. Nature. 389:1997;596-599.
5. Farah M. J. Visual Agnosia. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge.
6. Farah M. J. Patterns of co-occurrence among the associative agnosias: Implications for visual object representations. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 8:1991;1-19.
7. Farah M. J. Distinguishing perceptual and semantic impairments affecting visual object recognition. Vis. Cogn. 4:1997;199-206.
8. Gauthier I., Anderson A. W., Tarr M. J., Skudlarski P., Gore J. C. Levels of categorization in visual object recognition studied with functional MRI. Curr. Biol. 7:1997;645-651.
9. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Hendler T., Edelman S., Itzchak Y., Malach R. A sequence of object-processing stages revealed by fMRI in the human occipital lobe. Hum. Brain Mapp. 6:1998;316-328.
10. Humphreys G. W., Price C. J., Riddoch M. J. From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychol. Res. 62:1999;118-130.
11. Humphreys G. W., Riddoch M. J. The fractionation of visual agnosia. Humphreys G. W., Riddoch M. J. Visual Object Processing: A Cognitive Neuropsychological Approach. 1987;281-306 Erlbaum, London.
12. Humphreys G. W., Riddoch M. J., Quinlan P. T. Cascade processes in picture identification. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 5:1988;67-103.
13. Jolicoeur P., Gluck M. A., Kosslyn S. M. Pictures and names: Making the connection. Cogn. Psychol. 16:1984;243-275.
14. Kanwisher N., Woods R. P., Iacoboni M., Mazziotta J. C. A locus in human extrastriate cortex for visual shape analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9:1997;133-142.
15. Lissauer H. A case of visual agnosia with a contribution to theory (Ein Fall von Seelenblindheit nebst einem Beitrag zur Theorie derselben). Cogn. Neuropsychol. 5:1890;157-192.
16. Malach R., Reppas J. B., Benson R. B., Kwong K. K., Jiang H., Kennedy W. A. Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:1995;8135-8138.
17. Marr D. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. 1982;Freeman, San Francisco.
18. Marsolek C. J. Dissociable neural subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition. Psychol. Sci. 10:1999;111-118.
19. Martin A., Wiggs C. L., Ungerleider L. G., Haxby J. V. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature. 379:1996;649-652.
20. Moore C. J., Price C. J. A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. Brain. 122:1999;943-962.
21. Murtha S., Chertkow H., Beauregard M., Evans A. The neural substrate of picture naming. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11:1999;399-423.
22. Oldfield R. C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia. 9:1971;97-113.
23. Op de Beeck, H, and, Wagemans, J. 1999a, Visual object categorization at distinct levels of abstraction: A new stimulus set. Submitted for publication. [Available as Intern. Rep. No. 252, Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven.].
24. Op de Beeck, H, and, Wagemans, J. 1999b, Strategical flexibility in visual object categorization at distinct levels of abstraction. Submitted for publication. [Available as Intern. Rep. No. 254, Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven.].
25. Price C. J., Moore C. J., Humphreys G. W., Frackowiak R. S. J., Friston K. J. The neural regions sustaining object recognition and naming. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 263:1996;1501-1507.
26. Rosch E., Mervis C. B., Gray W. D., Johnson D. M., Boyes-Braem P. Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn. Psychol. 8:1976;382-439.
27. Schacter D. L., Reiman E., Uecker A., Polster M. R., Yun L. S., Cooper L. A. Brain regions associated with retrieval of structurally coherent visual information. Nature. 376:1995;587-590.
28. Schyns P. G. Diagnostic recognition: Task constraints, object information, and their interactions. Cognition. 67:1998;147-179.
29. Sergent J., Ohta S., MacDonald B. Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing: A positron emission tomography study. Brain. 115:1992;15-36.
30. Sobotka S., Nowicka A., Ringo J. L. Activity linked to externally cued saccades in single units recorded from hippocampal, parahippocampal, and inferotemporal areas of macaques. J. Neurophysiol. 78:1997;2156-2163.
31. Talairach J., Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. 1988;Thieme, New York.
32. Tversky B., Hemenway K. Objects, parts, and categories. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 113:1984;169-193.
33. Worsley K. J., Marrett S., Neelin P., Vandal A. C., Friston K. J., Evans A. C. A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 4:1996;58-73.