Yield components of samples of two wild Mexican common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) populations grown under cultivation

South African Journal of Plant and Soil

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 197-203

  Bayuelo Jimenez J S ^a   Pena Valdivia C B ^a   Aguirre R, J Rogelio ^b  

^a Colegio de Postgraduados ^*  (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Growth habit; Mexico; Phaseolus vulgaris; Wild common bean; Yield components

Indexed keywords

CROP YIELD; LEGUME; MORPHOLOGY;

MEXICO;

PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM); PHASEOLUS VULGARIS;

EID: 0343415596     PISSN: 02571862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02571862.1999.10635011     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adams, M. V., 1982. Plant architecture and yield breeding. Iowa J. Res., 56:225–254.
2. ANONONIMOUS. 1987. Programa de Frijol. Informe CIAT. Cali, Colombia, 50 p.
3. Bayuelo-Jiménez, J. S., Peña-Valdivia, C. B., and Aguirre, R. J.R., 1996. Phenotypic expression of wild common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) populations from two contrasting geographical areas. Annu. Report Bean Improvement Cooperative, 39:205–206.
4. Bayuelo-Jiménez, J. S., Escalante, E. J.S., and Kohashi, S. J., 1996. Nitrógeno, abscisión de órganos reproductivos y rendimiento en frijol. Agrociencia, 30 (4):515–521.
5. Bayuelo-Jiménez, J. S., Peña-Valdivia, C. B., and Aguirre, R. J.R., 1997. Yield determining traits in two Mexican wild common bean populations from contrasting geographical origin. Annu. Report Bean Improvement Cooperative, 40:28–29.
6. Berrocal, I. S., 1997. Comparación morfologica, fisióiogica, biofísica y del rendimiento de dos poblaciones, silvestre y domesticada de Phaseolus vulgaris L. Tesis de Maestria. Colegio de Postgraduados, México. 116 p
7. Binnie, R. C., and Clifford, P. E., 1981. Flower and pod production in. Phaseolus vulgaris L. J. Agric. Sci., 97:397–107.
8. Delgado, S. A., Bonet, A., and Gepts, P., 1988. “ The wild relative of Phaseolus vulgaris in middle America. In:Genetic Resources of Phaseolus Beans ”. Edited by:Gepts, P., 163–184. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer.
9. Evans, L. T., 1993. Crop Evolution, Adaptation and Yield. England:Cambridge University Press. 486 p
10. García, E., 1988. Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificación Climática de Koppen. Institute de Geografía, UNAM. México. 217 p.
11. García, HE., Peña-Valdivia, C. B., Aguirre, R. J.R., and Muru Ag, A. M. J.S., 1997. Morphological and agronomie traits of a wild population and an improved cultivar of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Ann. Bot., 79:207–213.
12. Geiger, D. R., and Shieh, W-J., 1988. Analysing partitioning of recently fixed and of reserve carbon in reproductive Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants. Plant Cell Environ., 11:777–783.
13. Gepts, P., and Debouck, D., 1991. Common Beans:Research for Crop Improvement Edited by:van Schoonhoven, A., and Voysest, O., 7–53. Origin, domestication, and evolution of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). C.A.B. Int., Wallingford, UK and CIAT, Cali, Colombia
14. Hardwick, R. C., 1988. “ Critical physiological traits in pulse crops. ”. In World Crops:Cool Season Food Legumes Edited by:Summerfield, R. J., 85–896. Kluwer Academic, England
15. Kaplan, L., 1965. Archaeology and domestication in American. Phaseolus:Econo. Bot., 19:358–368.
16. Koenig, R., and Gepts, P., 1989. Allozyme diversity in wild Phaseolus vulgaris L.:Further evidence for two major centers of genetic diversity. Theor. Appl. Genet., 44:809–817.
17. Miranda, C. S., 1967. Origen de Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Frijol común). Agrociencia, 1:99–109.
18. Nienhuis, J., and Singh, S. P., 1985. Effects of location and plant density on yield and architectural traits in dry beans. Crop Sci., 25:579–584.
19. Nienhuis, J., and Singh, S. P., 1986. Combining ability analyses and relationships among yield, yield components, and architectural traits in dry bean. Crop Sci., 26:21–27.
20. Peña-Valdivia, C. B., Aguirre, R. J.R., Garcia, H. E., Del, R., and Muruaga, M. J.S., 1998. Componentes del rendimiento de semilla de una población silvestre y un cultivar de frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Quad. Bot. Ambientale Appl., 6:181–187.
21. Peña-Valdivia, C. B., and Ortega-Delgado, M. L., 1991. Non-structural carbohydrate partitioning in Phaseolus vulgaris after vegetative growth. J. Sc. Food Agric., 55:563–577.
22. SAS INSTITUTE. 1986. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.03 SAS Institute. Cary, North Caroline.
23. Sexton, P. J., White, J. W., and Boote, K. J., 1994. Yield-determining processes in relation to cultivar seed size of common bean. Crop Sci., 34:84–91.
24. Singh, S. P., 1982. A key for identification of different growth habits of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Annu. Report Bean Improvement Cooperative, 25:92–94.
25. Singh, S. P., 1989. Patterns of variation in cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ. Bot., 43:39–57.
26. Singh, S. P., Gutierrez, J. A., Molina, A., Urrea, C., and Gepts, P., 1991. Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean:II. Marker-based analysis of morphological and agronomic traits. Crop Sci., 31:23–29.
27. Smartt, J., 1988. Common Beans:Research for Crop Improvement Edited by:Gepts, P. 143–162. The Netherlands:Dordrecht. Morphological, physiological and biochemical changes in Phaseolus bean under domestication. In:. Kluwer
28. Subhadrabandhu, S., Adams, M., and Reicosky, W., 1978. Abscission of flowers and fruits in Phaseolus vulgaris L. I. Cultivar differences in flowering pattern and abscission. Crop Sci., 18:893–896.
29. Toro, O., Thome, J., and Debouck, D. G., 1990. Wild bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.):description and distribution. IBPGR and CIAT. Cali, Colombia