Morphological and agronomic traits of a wild population and an improved cultivar of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 207-213

  García, Edith H ^a   Peña Valdivia, Cecilia B ^a   Aguirre, J R Rogelio ^a   Muruaga, José S M ^b  

^a Colegio de Postgraduados ^*  (Mexico)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIONES FORESTALES   (Mexico)

Author keywords

domestication; Growth; growth habit; Phaseolus vulgaris

Indexed keywords

PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM); PHASEOLUS VULGARIS;

EID: 0343144818     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0329     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adams MW. 1982. Plant architecture and yield breeding. Iowa State Journal Research 56: 225-254.
2. Anonymous. Undated. Morfología de la planta de frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cali, Colombia: CIAT.
3. Anonymous. 1986. SAS/STAT user's guide. North Carolina, U.S.A.: SAS Institute.
4. Anonymous. 1987. Programa de frijol. Informe CIAT. Cali, Colombia: CIAT.
5. Anonymous. 1993. Metodología para obtener semillas de calidad. Cali, Colombia: CIAT.
6. Bates DM. 1985. Plant utilization: patterns and prospects. Economic Botany 39: 241-265.
7. Berglund-Brücher O, Brücher H. 1976. The South American wild bean (Phaseolus aborigineus Burk.) as ancestor of the common bean. Economic Botany 30: 257-272.
8. Bressani R. 1993. Grain quality of common beans. Food Reviews International 9: 237-297.
9. Brücher H. 1989. Useful plants of neotropical origin. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
10. Campos EA. (undated). Bayo Mecentral-90. Nueva variedad de frijol para la región de los valles altos de la Mesa Central. Mexico: INIFAP, SARH.
11. Casas DE. 1958. Herencia de tres caracteres morfológicos en frijol y su relación con la obtención de variedades puras. Tesis professional. Escuela Nacional de Agricultura. Chapingo, México.
12. Delgado SA, Bonet A, Gepts P. 1988. The wild relative of Phaseolus vulgaris in Middle America. In: Gepts P, ed. Genetic resources of Phaseolus bean. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 163-184.
13. Eseltine V. 1931. Systematic botany of beans, and their allies. In: Hedrick UP, ed. The vegetables of New York. New York, USA: New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Albany, 8-16.
14. Evans AM. 1976a. Beans. In: Simmonds NW, ed. Evolution of crop plants. New York, U.S.A.: Longman, 168-172.
15. Evans LT. 1976b. Physiological adaptation to performance as crop plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B275: 71-83.
16. Font Quer P. 1953. Diccionario de botánica. Barcelona, España: Labor.
17. Garcia E. 1972. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Koppen. México: Instituto de Geografía, UNAM.
18. Gentry HS. 1969. Origin of the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris. Economic Botany 23: 55-69.
19. Gepts P. 1991. La biotecnología aclara el proceso de domesticación. Diversity 7: 16-17.
20. Gepts P. 1994. Análisis moleculares del proceso de domesticación en plantas: el ejemplo del frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris). In: Memorias de 11° Congreso latinoamericano de genética (área vegetal) y XV Congreso de fitogenética. Monterrey, Nuevo León, México: SOMEFI, 4-27.
21. Gepts P, Osborn TC, Rashka K, Bliss FA. 1986. Phaseolin-protein variability in wild forms and landraces of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Economic Botany 40: 451-468.
22. Gifford RM, Evans LT. 1981. Photosynthesis, carbon partitioning and yield. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 32: 485-509.
23. Heath OVS. 1970. Investigation by experiment. UK: Edward Arnold Ltd.
24. Heiser CB. 1988. Aspects of unconscious selection and the evolution of domesticated plants. Euphytica 37: 77-81.
25. Hernández XE, Ramos RA, Martínez AMA. 1979. Etnobotánica. In: Engleman EM, ed. Contribuciones al conocimiento del frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) en México. Chapingo, México: Colegio de Postgraduados, 113-149.
26. Isely D. 1982. Leguminosae and Homo sapiens. Economic Botany 36: 46-70.
27. Koenig R, Gepts P. 1989. Allozyme diversity in wild Phaseolus vulgaris: further evidence for two major centers of genetic diversity. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 78: 809-817.
28. Kohashi SJ. 1990. Aspectos de la morfología y fisiología del frijol Phaseolus vulgaris L. y su relación con el rendimiento. Montecillo, México: Colegio de Postgraduados.
29. Ladizinsky G. 1987. Pulse domestication before cultivation. Economic Botany 41: 60-65.
30. Leakey CLA. 1988. Genotypic and phenotypic markers in common bean. In: Gepts P, ed. Genetic resources of Phaseolus bean. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 245-327.
31. Miranda CS. 1967. Origen de Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Frijol común). Agrociencia 1: 99-109.
32. Miranda CS. 1971. Cruzamiento natural en frijol. Agricultura Técnica en México 3: 48-52.
33. Nabhan GP, Muruaga JS, Cardenas F, Bums BT. 1986. Wild bean exploration in northwest Mexico and Southwest USA. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 65: 23-25.
34. Nienhuis J, Singh SP. 1986. Combining ability analyses and relationships among yield, yield components, and architectural traits in dry bean. Crop Science 26: 21-27.
35. Smartt J. 1969. Evolution of American Phaseolus beans under domestication. In: Ucko PJ, Dimbleby GW, eds. The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals. London: Duckworth, 451-462.
36. Smartt J. 1978. The evolution of pulse crops. Economic Botany 32: 185-198.
37. Smartt J. 1988. Morphological, physiological and biochemical changes in Phaseolus bean under domestication. In: Gepts P, ed. Genetic resources of Phaseolus bean. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 143-161.
38. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1981. Biometry. New York: WH Freeman.
39. Solorzano VR, Engleman M. 1988. Clasificación de hábitos de crecimiento en Phaseolus vulgaris. Agronciencia 71: 33-42.
40. Sousa SM, Delgado SA. 1979. Taxonomía. Herramientas y consideraciones para la revisión del género Phaseolus. In: Engleman ME, ed. Contribuciones al conocimiento del frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) en México. Chapingo. México: Colegio de Postgraduados, 59-82.
41. Toro O, Tohme J, Debouck DJ. 1990. Wild bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): description and distribution. Cali, Colombia: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR) and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT).
42. Triana B, Iwanaga M, Rubiano H, Andrade M. 1993. A study of allogamy in wild Phaseolus vulgaris. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative 36: 20-21.
43. Vanderborght T. 1983. Evaluation of Phaseolus vulgaris wild types and weedy forms. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletters 54: 18-24.
44. Voysest O, Dessert M. 1991. Bean cultivars: classes and commercial seed types. In: Van Schoonhoven A, Voysest O, eds. Common beans: research for crop improvement. Wallingford, UK: CAB International and CIAT, 119-162.
45. White JW, Izquierdo J. 1991. Physiology of yield potential and stress tolerance. In: Van Schoonhoven A, Voysest O, eds. Common beans: research for crop improvement. Wallingford, UK: CAB International and CIAT, 287-380.
46. Woolley J, Davis JHC. 1991. The agronomy of intercropping with beans. In: Van Schoonhoven A, Voysest O, eds. Common beans: research for crop improvement. Wallingford, UK: CAB International and CIAT, 707-735.