Are angiosperms firmly rooted?

Taxon

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 529-

  Scotland, Robert W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0343390959     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1224348     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Bremer, B., Jansen, R. K., Oxelman, B., Backlund, M., Lantz, H. & Kim, K. J. 1999. More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny - case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Syst Biol. 48: 413-435.
2. Crane, P. R., Friis, E. M & Pedersen, K. R. 1995. The origin and early diversification of angiosperms. Nature 374: 27-33.
3. Friis, E. M., Pedersen, K. R. & Crane, P. R. 1994. Angiosperm floral structures from the Early Cretaceous of Portugal. Pl. Syst. Evol. (Suppl.) 8: 31-49.
4. _ , _ & _ 1999. Early angiosperm diversification: the diversity of pollen associated with angiosperm reproductive structures in Early Cretaceous floras from Portugal. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 86: 259-296.
5. Graybeal, A. 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47: 9-17.
6. Hillis, D. M. 1996. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383: 130-131.
7. _ 1998. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy and investigator bias. Syst. Biol. 47: 3-8.
8. _ & Bull, J. J. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42: 182-192.
9. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1998. Systematic bias in phylogenetic analysis: is the Strepsiptera problem solved? Syst Biol. 47: 519-535.
10. Källersjö, M., Albert, V. A. & Farris, J. S. 1999. Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15: 91-93.
11. Mathews, S. & Donoghue, M. J. 1999. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286: 947-950.
12. Poe, S. 1998. Sensitivity of phylogeny estimation to taxon sampling. Syst. Biol. 47: 18-31.
13. Qiu, Y. L., Lee, J., Bernasconi-Quadroni, F., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Zanis, M., Zimmer, E. A., Chen, Z., Savolainen, V. & Chase, M. W. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402: 404-407.
14. Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E. & Chase, M. W. 1999. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402: 402-404.
15. Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Mort, M. E., Chase, M. W., Savolainen, V., Hoot, S. B. & Morton, C. M. 1998. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 47: 32-42.
16. Sun, G., Dilcher, D. L., Zheng, S. & Zhou, Z. 1998. In search of the first flower: A Jurassic angiosperm, Archaefructus, from Northeast China. Science 282: 1692-1695.
17. Sytsma, K. J. & Baum, D. A. 1996. Molecular phylogenies and the diversification of the angiosperms. Pp. 314-340 in: Taylor, D. W. & Hickey, L. J. (eds.), Flowering plant origin, evolution & phylogeny. New York.