Semi-global robust nonlinear control: State-dependent scaling and computational aspects

Proceedings of the American Control Conference

Volumn 3, Issue , 1998, Pages 1663-1668

  Hiroshi, Ito ^a  

^a KYUSHU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS; COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS; CONTROLLER SYNTHESIS; LMI-CONDITION; ROBUST CONTROL OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; ROBUST NON-LINEAR CONTROLS; ROBUST PERFORMANCE; STATE-DEPENDENT;

CONVEX OPTIMIZATION; LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES; ROBUST CONTROL; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

NONLINEAR SYSTEMS;

EID: 0343155678     PISSN: 07431619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ACC.1998.707289     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. J. Imura, H. Maeda, T. Sugie and T. Yoshikawa, Syst. Contr. Lett., 24, pp.103-114, 1995.
2. T. Shen and K. Tamura, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 40, pp.766-768, 1995.
3. H. Ito, Syst. Contr. Lett., 28, pp.167-172, 1996.
4. L. Pavel and F. W. Fairman, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Contr., 6, pp. 691-726, 1996.
5. A. V. Savkin and I. R. Petersen, Int. J. Contr., 62 pp.443-460, 1995.
6. S. Nguang, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 41, pp. 1003-1007, 1996.
7. W.-M. Lu and J.C. Doyle, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 42, pp. 1654-1662, 1997.
8. 2-gain and passivity techniques in nonlinear control, Springer-Verlag, 1996.
9. M. Cromme and J Stoustrup, in Proc. European Control Conference 97, July. 1997,
10. A. J. van der Schaft, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 37, pp.770-784, 1992.
11. H. D. Tuan and S. Hosoe, Syst. Contr. Lett., 27, pp.21-27, 1996.
12. A. Rantzer and M. Johansson, in Proc. American Contr. Conf., June. 1997, pp. 1749-1753.
13. J. R. Cloutier, in Proc. American Contr. Conf., June. 1997, pp. 932-936.
14. J. Shamma and M. Athans, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 12, pp. 101-107, 1992.
15. A. Packard, 1997 American Contr. Conf. Plenary Session II, June. 1997,
16. H. Ito, "State-dependent scaling for robust nonlinear control: techniques and effectiveness," submitted.
17. D. Packard and J. Doyle, Automatica, 29, pp. 71-109, 1993.
18. T. Iwasaki, in Proc. 35th IEEE Conf. Decis. Contr., Dec. 1997, to appear.
19. P. Gahinet, P. Apkarian and M. Chilali, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 41, pp. 436-442, 1996.
20. F. Wu, X. Yang, A. Packard and G. Becker, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Contr., 6, pp. 983-998, 1996.
21. P. Apkarian and R. J. Adams, in Proc. American Contr. Conf., June. 1997, pp. 3331-3335.
22. G. Becker and A. Packard, Syst. Contr. Lett., 23, pp.205-215, 1994.
23. P. Apkarian, P. Gahinet and G. Becker, Automatica, 31, pp. 1251-1261, 1995.
24. P. Gahinet, A. Nemirovski, A. J. Laub and M. Chilali, The LMI Control Toolbox, The MathWorks Inc., 1995.
25. M. Chilali and P. Gahinet, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 41, pp. 358-367, 1996.
26. P. Gahinet and P. Apkarian, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Contr., 4, pp. 421-448, 1994.
27. G. Becker, in Proc. 13th IFAC World Congress, July. 1996, pp. 351-356.
28. W. Lu and J. C. Doyle, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 40, pp. 1668-1675, 1995.
29. S. Sasaki and K. Uchida, Trans. SICE, 33, pp. 1111-1112, 1997 (in Japanese).
30. J. C. Doyle, in Proc. 24th IEEE Conf. Decis. Contr., Dec. 1985, pp. 260-265.