Cost-effective treatment of couples with subfertility

Lancet

Volumn 355, Issue 9197, 2000, Pages 2-

  Bhattacharya, Siladitya ^a   Hall, Marion ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NOTE; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUBFERTILITY;

EID: 0342980229     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00467-5     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Hughes E.G. The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis. Human Reprod. 12:1997;1865-1872.
2. Cohlen, B.J., Vandekerckhove, P., te Velde, E.R., Habbema, J.D.F. Timed intercourse versus intra-uterine insemination with or without ovarian hyperstimulation for subfertility in men (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Oxford: Update Software, 1999.
3. Collins J.A., Burrows E.A., Willan A.R. 1 The prognosis for live birth among untreated infertile couples. Fertil Steril. 64:1995;22-28.
4. Templeton A., Morris J.K., Parslow W. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Lancet. 348:1996;1402-1406.
5. Briggs A., Sculpher An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics. 13:1998;379-409.
6. Botting, B.J., MacFarlane, A.J., Price, F.V. Three, four and more: a study of triplet and higher order births. London: H M Stationery Office, 1990.
7. Van Voorhis B.J., Stovall D.W., Allen B.D., Syrop C.H. Cost-effective treatment of the infertile couple. Fertil Steril. 70:1998;995-1005.