Effects of neonatal inferior prefrontal and medial temporal lesions on learning the rule for delayed nonmatching-to-sample

Developmental Neuropsychology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 399-421

  Málková, Ludise ^b   Bachevalier, Jocelyne ^a   Webster, Maree ^b   Mishkin, Mortimer ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULTHOOD; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; BRAIN INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; IMMATURITY; LEARNING; MALE; NEWBORN; NEWBORN PERIOD; NONHUMAN; ONTOGENY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; RHESUS MONKEY; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 0342748334     PISSN: 87565641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S1532694207Malkova     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Alvarez, P., Zola-Morgan, S., & Squire, L. R. (1995). Damage limited to the hippocampal region produces long-lasting memory impairment in monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 3796-3807.
2. Bachevalier, J. (1990). Ontogenetic development of habit and memory formation in primates. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608, 457-484.
3. Bachevalier, J., Beauregard, M., & Alvarado, M. C. (1999). Long-term effects of neonatal damage to the hippocampal formation and amygdaloid complex on object discrimination and object recognition in rhesus monkeys. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113, 1127-1151.
4. Bachevalier, J., Brickson, M., & Hagger, C. (1993). Limbic-dependent recognition memory in monkeys develops early in infancy. Neuroreport, 4, 77-80.
5. Bachevalier, J., Brickson, M., Hagger, C., & Mishkin, M. (1990). Age and sex differences in the effects of selective temporal lobe lesions on the formation of visual discrimination habits in rhesus monkeys. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 885-899.
6. Bachevalier, J., Hagger, C., & Mishkin, M. (1991). Functional maturation of the occipitotemporal pathway in infant rhesus monkeys. In N. A. Lassen, D. H. Ingvar, M. E. Raichle, & L. Friberg (Eds.), Alfred Benzon Sympozium 31, Brain work and mental activity, quantitative studies with radioactive tracers (pp. 231-241). Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard.
7. Bachevalier, J., & Mishkin, M. (1984). An early and late developing system for learning and retention in infant monkeys. Behavioral Neuroscience, 98, 770-778.
8. Bachevalier, J., & Mishkin, M. (1994). Effects of selective neonatal temporal lobe lesions on visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 2128-2139.
9. Bachevalier, J., Málková, L., & Mishkin, M. (in press). Effects of selective neonatal temporal lobe lesions on socioemotional behavior in infant rhesus monkeys. Behavioral Neuroscience.
10. Barbas, H. (1988). Anatomical organization of basoventral and mediodorsal visual recipient prefrontal regions in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 276, 313-342.
11. Barbas, H., & Mesulam, M. -M. (1981). Organization of afferent input to subdivisions to area 8 in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 200, 407-431.
12. Barbas, H., & Mesulam, M. -M. (1985). Cortical afferent input to the principalis region of the rhesus monkey. Neuroscience, 15, 619-637.
13. Baxter, M. G., Saunders, R. C., & Murray, E. A. (1998). Aspiration lesions of the amygdala interrupt connections between prefrontal cortex and temporal cortex in rhesus monkeys. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 24, 1905.
14. Chavis, D. A., & Pandya, D. N. (1976). Further observations on corticofrontal connections in the rhesus monkey. Brain Research, 117, 369-386.
15. Distler, C., Boussaoud, D., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1993). Cortical connections of inferior temporal area TEO in macaque monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 334, 125-150.
16. Eacott, M. J., Gaffan, D., & Murray, E. A. (1994). Preserved recognition memory for small sets, and impaired stimulus identification for large sets, following rhinal cortex ablations in monkeys. European Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 1466-1478.
17. Fagan, J. F. (1970). Memory in the infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 9, 217-226.
18. Gellerman, L. W. (1933). Chance orders for alternating stimuli in visual discriminative experiments. Journal of General Psychology, 42, 207-208.
19. George, P. J., Horel, J. A., & Cirillo, R. A. (1989). Reversible cold lesions of the parahippocampal gyrus in monkey results in deficits of the delayed matching-to-sample and other visual tasks. Behavioral Brain Research, 34, 163-178.
20. Goldman, P.S. (1971). Functional development of the prefrontal cortex in early life and the problem of neuronal plasticity. Experimental Neurology, 32, 366-287.
21. Goulet, S., Dore, F. Y., & Murray, E. A. (1998). Aspiration lesions of the amygdala disrupt the rhinal corticothalamic projection system in rhesus monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 119, 131-140.
22. Horel, J. A., Pytko-Joyner, D.E., Voytko, M. L., & Salsbury, K. (1987). The performance of visual tasks while segments of the inferotemporal cortex are suppressed by cold. Behavioral Brain Research, 23, 29-42.
23. Jacobson, S., & Trojanowski, J. Q. (1977). Prefrontal granular cortex of the rhesus monkey. I. Intrahemispheric cortical afferents. Brain Research, 132, 209-233.
24. Jones, E. G., & Powell, T. P. S. (1970). An anatomical study of converging sensory pathways within the cerebral cortex of the monkey. Brain, 93, 793-820.
25. Kawamura, K., & Naito, J. (1984). Corticocortical projections to the prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey investigated with horseradish peroxidase techniques. Neuroscience Research, 1, 89-103.
26. Kowalska, D., Bachevalier, J., & Mishkin, M. (1991). The role of the inferior prefrontal convexity in performance of delayed nonmatching-to-sample. Neuropsychologia, 29, 583-600.
27. Kuypers, H. G. J. M., Szwarcbart, M. K., Mishkin, M., & Rosvold, H. E. (1965). Occipitotemporal corticocortical connections in the rhesus monkey. Experimental Neurology, 11, 245-262.
28. Málková, L., Mishkin, M., & Bachevalier, J. (1995). Long-term effects of selective neonatal temporal lobe lesions on learning and memory in monkeys. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 212-226.
29. Meunier, M., Bachevalier, J., & Mishkin, M. (1997). Effects of orbital frontal and anterior cingulate lesions on object and spatial memory in rhesus monkeys. Neuropsychologia, 35, 999-1015.
30. Meunier, M., Bachevalier, J., Mishkin, M., & Murray, E. A. (1993). Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience 13, 5418-5432.
31. Mishkin, M. (1978). Memory in monkeys severely impaired by combined but not separate removal of amygdala and hippocampus. Nature, 273, 297-298.
32. Mishkin, M. ( 1982). A memory system in the monkey. Philosofical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Biology), 298, 85-95.
33. Mishkin, M., & Phillips, R. R. (1990). A corticolimbic path revealed through its disconnection. In C. Trevarthen (Ed.), Brain circuits and functions of the mind. Essays in honor of Roger W. Sperry (pp. 196-210). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Murray, E. A. (1992). Medial temporal lobe structures contributing to recognition memory: The amygdaloid complex versus the rhinal cortex. In J. P. Aggleton (Ed.), The amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction (pp. 453-470). New York: Wiley.
35. Murray, E. A., & Mishkin, M. (1998). Object recognition and location memory in monkeys with excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 6568-6582.
36. Pandya, D. N., & Kuypers, H. G. J. M. (1969). Corticocortical connections in the rhesus monkey. Brain Research, 13, 13-36.
37. Pixley, G. L., Málková, L., Webster, M. J., Mishkin, M., & Bachevalier, J. (1997). Early damage to both inferior convexity and orbital prefrontal cortices impairs DNMS in infant monkeys. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 23, 499.
38. Rodman, H. R., Skelly, J. P., & Gross, C. G. (1991). Stimulus selectivity and state dependence of activity in inferior temporal cortex in infant monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 88, 7572-7575.
39. Ruppenthal, G. C., Walker, C. G., & Sackett, G. P. (1991). Rearing infant monkeys (Macaca nemestrina) in pairs produces deficient development compared with rearing in single cages. American Journal of Primatology, 25, 103-113.
40. Saunders, R. C., Aigner, T. G., & Frank, J. A. (1990). Magnetic resonance imaging of the rhesus monkey brain: Use for stereotaxic neurosurgery. Experimental Brain Research, 81, 443-446.
41. Shiwa, T. (1987). Corticocortical projections to the monkey temporal lobe with particular reference to the visual processing pathways. Archives of Italian Biology, 125, 139-154.
42. Suzuki, W. A., Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., & Amaral, D. G. (1993). Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocamapal cortices in the monkey produce long lasting memory impairments in the visual and tactual modalities. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 2430-2451.
43. Ungerleider, L. G., Gaffan, D., & Pelak, V. S. (1989). Projections from inferior temporal cortex to prefrontal cortex via the uncinate fascicle in rhesus monkey. Experimental Brain Research, 76, 473-484.
44. Voytko, M. L. (1985). Cooling orbital frontal cortex disrupts matching-to-sample and visual discrimination learning in monkeys. Physiology and Psychology, 13, 219-229.
45. Webster, M. J., Bachevalier, J., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1994). Connections of inferior temporal areas TEO and TE with parietal and frontal cortex in macaque monkeys. Cerebral Cortex, 4, 470-483.
46. Webster, M. J., Mishkin, M., & Bachevalier, J. (1994). Slow rule learning in infant monkeys is due in part to functional immaturity of inferior frontal cortex. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 20, 351.
47. Webster, M. J., Ungerleider, L. G., & Bachevalier, J. (1991a). Connections of inferior temporal area TE and TEO with medial temporal-lobe structures in infant and adult monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 1095-1116.
48. Webster, M. J., Ungerleider, L. G., & Bachevalier, J. (1991b). Lesions of inferior temporal cortical area TE in infant monkeys alter cortico-amygdalar projections. Neuroreport, 2, 769-772.
49. Weinstein, J. A., Saunders, R. C., & Mishkin, M. (1988). Temporo-prefronlal interaction in rule learning by macaques. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 14, 1230.
50. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., Amaral, D. G., & Suzuki, W. A. (1989). Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 4355-4370.
51. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., Clower, R. P., & Rempel, N. L. (1993). Damage to the perirhinal cortex exacerbates memory impairment following lesions of the hippocampal formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 251-265.