Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Obstetrics

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 868-877

  Zaretsky, Michael V ^a   Twickler, Diane M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS; FETUS MALFORMATION; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT COUNSELING; PELVIMETRY; PLACENTA ACCRETA; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TERATOLOGY;

FEMALE; FETAL DISEASES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSTETRICS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 0242678344     PISSN: 00099201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003081-200312000-00018     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Wiskirchen J, Groenewaeller EF, Kehlbach R, et al. Long-term effects of repetitive exposure to a static magnetic field (1.5 T) on proliferation of human fetal lung fibroblasts. Magn Reson Med. 1999;41:464-468.
2. Kanal E. Pregnancy and the safety of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI Clin N Amer. 1994;2:309-317.
3. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR, et al. A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:32-33.
4. Clements H, Duncan KR, Fielding K, et al. Infants exposed to MRI in utero have a normal paediatric assessment of 9 months of age. Br J Radiol. 2000;73:190-194.
5. Glover P, Hykin J, Gowland P, et al. An assessment of the intrauterine sound intensity level during obstetric echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. 1995;68:1090-1094.
6. Arulkuman S, Skurr B, Tong H, et al. No evidence of hearing loss due to fetal acoustic stimulation test. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:283-285.
7. Vadeyar SH, Moore RJ, Strachan BK, et al. Effect of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:666-669.
8. Twickler DM, Reichel T, McIntire DD, et al. Fetal central nervous system ventricle and cisterna magna measurements by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:927-931.
9. Levine D, Bames PD. Cortical maturation in normal and abnormal fetuses as assessed with prenatal MR imaging. Radiology. 1999;210:751-758.
10. Levine D, Bames PD, Madsen JR, et al. Central nervous system abnormalities assessed with prenatal magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:1011-1019.
11. Simon EM, Goldstein RB, Coakley FV, et al. Fast MR imaging of fetal CNS anomalies in utero. Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1688-1698.
12. Twickler DM, Magee KP, Caire J, et al. Second-opinion magnetic resonance imaging for suspected fetal central nervous system abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:492-496.
13. Caire JT, Zaretsky M, Magee KP, Ramus RM, Twickler DM. MR imaging findings of complicated twin pregnancies. AJR 2002;178(S):97 (A263).
14. Walsh DS, Hubbard AM, Olutoye OO, et al. Assessments of fetal lung volumes and liver herniation with magnetic resonance imaging in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1067-1069.
15. Twickler DM, Caire J, McIntire DD, et al. Feasibility of magnetic resonance lung volumes in fetuses at risk for pulmonary hypoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185: S246.
16. Poutamo J, Vanninen R, Partanen K, et al. Diagnosing fetal urinary tract abnormalities: benefits of MRI compared to ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:63-71.
17. Engels JE, Ramus RM, Zaretsky M, et al. Ultrafast T1-weighted SPGR and T2-weighted SSFSE MR sequences: findings in fetal genitourinary and gastrointestinal abnormalities. AJR. 2003;S180(GU007)
18. Levine D, Hulka CA, Ludmir J, et al. Placenta Accreta: evaluation with color doppler US, power doppler US, and MR imaging. Radiology. 1997;205:773-776.
19. Twickler DM, Lucas MJ, Balis AB, et al. Color flow mapping for myometrial invasion in women with a prior cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Med. 2000;9:330-335.
20. Garden AS, Roberts N. Fetal and fetal organ volume estimations with magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:442-448.
21. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Gowland PA, et al. Fetal weight estimation by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet. 1994;343:644-645.
22. Zaretsky M, Reichel TF, McIntire D, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging to ultrasound in the estimation of birth weight at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:S193 (A491).
23. Hassibi SM, Reichel TF, Zaretsky M. et al. MR calculation of fetal weight at term: comparison of planar orientations. AJR. 2003;S180(083)
24. van Loon AJ, Mantingh A, Serlier EK, et al. Randomised controlled trial of magnetic-resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation at term. Lancet. 1997;350:1799-1804.
25. Sporri S, Thoeny HC, Raio L, et al. MR imaging pelvimetry: a useful adjunct in the treatment of women at risk for dystocia? AJR. 2002;179:137-144.
26. Zaretsky MV, Ramus RM, Twickler DM. Single uterine fast acquisition magnetic resonance fetal surgery: is it feasible? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003;14:107-112.
27. Zaretsky MV, McIntire DD, Twickler DM. Feasibility of the fetal anatomic and maternal pelvic survey by magnetic resonance imaging at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003.