Financial frictions and investment: Requiem in Q

Review of Economic Dynamics

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 710-728

  Cooper, Russell ^a   Ejarque, João ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242676960     PISSN: 10942025     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2003.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abel, A., Blanchard, O., 1986. The present value of profits and cyclical movements in investments. Econometrica 54, 249-273.
2. Abel, A., Eberly, J., 1999. Investment and q with fixed costs: an empirical analysis. Mimeo.
3. Abel, A., Eberly, J., 2002. Q theory without adjustment costs and cash flow effects without financing constraints. Mimeo.
4. Barnett, S., Sakellaris, P., 1999. A new look at firm market value, investment and adjustment costs. Review of Economics and Statistics.
5. Bayraktar, N., Sakellaris, P., Vermeulen, P. 2003. Real versus financial frictions to capital investment. Mimeo.
6. Bernanke, B., Gertler, M., 1995. Inside the black box: The credit channel of monetary policy transmission. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4), 27-48.
7. Chirinko, R., 1993. Business fixed investment spending. Journal of Economic Literature 31, 1875-1911.
8. Chirinko, R., 1997. Finance constraints, liquidity and investment spending: theoretical restrictions and international evidence. Journal of Japanese and International Economics 11, 185-207.
9. Cooper, R., Ejarque, J., 2001. Exhuming Q: Market power vs. capital market imperfections. NBER working paper No. 8182.
10. Cooper, R., Haltiwanger, J., 2000. On the nature of the capital adjustment process. NBER working paper No. 7925.
11. Cooper, R., Haltiwanger, J., Power, L., 1999. Machine replacement and the business cycle: lumps and bumps. American Economic Review 89, 921-946.
12. Cummins, J., Hassett, K., Hubbard, G., 1994. A reconsideration of investment behavior using tax reforms as natural experiments. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2, 1-74.
13. Erickson, T., Whited, T., 2000. Measurement error and the relationship between investment and Q. Journal of Political Economy 108, 1027-1057.
14. Fazzari, S., Hubbard, R., Petersen, B., 1988. Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 141-195.
15. Gilchrist, S., Himmelberg, C., 1995. Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment. Journal of Monetary Economics 36, 541-572.
16. Gilchrist, S., Himmelberg, C., 1998. Investment: fundamentals and finance. In: NBER Macroeconomics Annual. MIT Press, pp. 223-262.
17. Gomes, J., 2001. Financing investment. American Economic Review 91 (5), 1263-1285.
18. Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A., 1996. Simulation-Based Econometric Methods. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
19. Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A., Renault, E., 1993. Indirect inference. Journal of Applied Econometrics 8, S85-S118.
20. Hayashi, F., 1982. Tobin's marginal Q and average Q: a neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica 50, 215-224.
21. Lindenberg, E., Ross, S., 1981. Tobin's Q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business 54 (1), 1-32.
22. Lucas, R., Prescott, E., 1971. Investment under uncertainty. Econometrica 39, 659-681.
23. Tauchen, G., 1986. Finite state Markov-chain approximations to univariate and vector autoregressions. Economics Letters 20, 177-181.
24. Tirole, J., 2001. Corporate governance. Econometrica 69 (1), 1-35.
25. Whited, T., 1998. Why do investment Euler equations fail? Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 16 (4), 479-488.
26. Whited, T., 2002. External finance constraints and the intertemporal pattern of intermittent investment. Mimeo. Department of Finance, Univ. of Iowa.