Comparison of mammographically guided breast biopsy techniques

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 229, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 625-633

  Velanovich, Vic ^a   Lewis Jr , Frank R ^a   Nathanson, S David ^a   Strand, Vernon F ^a   Talpos, Gary B ^a   Bhandarka, Srinivas ^a   Elkus, Robert ^a   Szymanski, Wanda ^a   Ferrara, John J ^a  

^a HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; BREAST BIOPSY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXCISION; FEMALE; GUIDE WIRE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; OPERATING ROOM; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

BIOPSY; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033506109     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199905000-00004     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Velanovich V. Immediate biopsy versus observation for abnormal findings on mammograms: an analysis of potential outcomes and costs. Am J Surg 1995; 170:327-332.
2. Staren ED. Ultrasound guided biopsy of nonpalpable breast masses by surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol 1996; 3:476-482.
3. Sarfati MR, Fox KA, Warneke JA, et al. Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions: an analysis of 258 consecutive aspirates. Am J Surg 1994; 168:529-532.
4. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994; 193:359-364.
5. Yim JH, Premsti W, Weber B, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer: benefits of stereotactic versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg 1996; 223:688-700.
6. Fuhrman GM, Cedarbom GJ, Bolton JS, et al. Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities. Ann Surg 1998; 227:932-939.
7. Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, et al. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic. 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 1998; 208:251-260.
8. Kelley WE, Bailey R, Bertelson C, et al. Stereotactic automated surgical biopsy using the ABBI biopsy device: a multicenter study. Breast J 1998; 4:302-306.
9. Shuler FW, White JG, Wilson RA, et al. Advanced breast biopsy instrumentation: an early prospective series. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna, Italy: Monduzzi Editore; 1998:751-755.
10. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA. Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 1997; 204:677-684.
11. Schmidt RA. Stereotactic breast biopsy. CA Cancer J Clin 1994; 44:172-191.
12. Moore MM, Hargett CW III, Hanks JB, et al. Association of breast cancer with finding of atypical ductal hyperplasia at core needle biopsy. Ann Surg 1997; 225:726-733.
13. Erickson EJ, McGreevy JM, Muskett A. Selective nonoperative management of patients referred with abnormal mammograms. Am J Surg 1990; 160:659-663.
14. Hasselgren P-O, Hummel RP, Fieler MA. Breast biopsy with needle localization: influence of age and mammographic features on the rate of malignancy in 350 nonpalpable breast lesions. Surgery 1991; 110: 623-628.
15. McManus V, DeSautels JEL, Beneditsson H, et al. Enhancement of true-positive rates for nonpalpable carcinoma of the breast through mammographic selection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 175:212-218.
16. Wu YC, Freedman MT, Hasegawa A, et al. Classification of microcalcifications in radiographs of pathologic specimens for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Acad Radiol 1995; 2:199-204.
17. Ibrahim N, Fujita H, Hara T, Endo T. Automated detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: CAD system application of MIAS database. Phys Biol Med 1997; 42:2577-2589.
18. Velanovich V. Fractal analysis of mammographic lesions: a prospective, blinded trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1998; 49:245-249.
19. Dowlatshahi K, Yaremko ML, Kluskans LF, Jokich PM. Nonpalpable breast lesions: findings of stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1991; 181:745-750.
20. Selim A, Tahan SR. Microscopic localization of calcifications in and around breast carcinoma: a cautionary note for needle core biopsies. Ann Surg 1998; 228:95-98.
21. Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Libennan L, Abramson AF. Nondiagnostic stereotaxic core breast biopsy: results of rebiopsy. Radiology 1996; 198:323-325.
22. Lee CH, Egglin TK, Phipotts L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings. Radiology 1997; 202:849-854.
23. Bonzanini M, Gilioli E, Brancato B, et al. Cytologic features of 22 radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast, three of which associated with carcinoma: clinical, mammographic, and histologic correlation. Diag Cytopathol 1997; 17:353-362.
24. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-needle core biopsy: nonmalignant breast abnormalities evaluated with surgical excision or repeat core biopsy. Radiology 1998; 206:717-720.
25. Berg WA, Ruban RH, Kumar D, et al. Lessons from mammographic-histopathologic correlation of large-core needle breast biopsy. Radiographics 1996; 16:1111-1130.
26. Lind DS, Minter R, Steinbach B, et al. Stereotactic core biopsy reduces the re-excision rate and the cosls of mammographically detected cancer. J Surg Res 1998; 78:23-26.
27. Acosta JA, Greenlee JA, Gubler D, et al. Surgical margins after needle-localization breast biopsy. Am J Surg 1995; 170:643-646.