Outcome, efficiency, and time-trend pattern analyses for stroke rehabilitation

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 193-201

  Stineman, Margaret G ^a   Granger, Carl V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Forecasting Trends; Functional Independence Measure Function Related Groups; Health Policy; Outcome and Process Assessment; Stroke

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; FORECASTING; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE FUNCTION RELATED GROUPS; HEALTH POLICY; STROKE;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; STROKE; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EFFICIENCY; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0032078818     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199805000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Dobkin B: The economic impact of stroke. Neurology 1995;45:S6-S9.
2. Fiedler RC, Granger CV: The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Report of First Admissions for 1995. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997;76:76-81.
3. Stineman MG, Goin J, Hamilton BB, Granger CV: Efficiency pattern analysis for medical rehabilitation. Am J Med Qual 1995;10:190-199.
4. SM), Version 4.0. Buffalo, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1995.
5. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, Zielezny M, Sherwin FS: Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1986;1:59-74.
6. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV: Interrater reliability of the 7-level Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Scand J Rehabil Med 1994;26:115-119.
7. Stineman MG, Escarce JJ, Goin JE, Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Williams SV: A case mix classification system for medical rehabilitation. Med Care 1994;32:366-379.
8. World Health Organization: International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1980.
9. Stineman MG, Tassoni CJ, Escarce JJ, et al.: Development of function related groups, Version 2.0: a classification system for medical rehabilitation. Health Serv Res 1997;32:529-548.
10. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB: The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:127-132.
11. Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette AM, et al.: The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1101-1108.
12. Carter G, Relles D, Buchanan J, et al.: A Classification System for Inpatient Medical Rehabilitation Patients: A Review and Proposed Revisions to the Functional Independence Measure - Function Related Groups. Santa Monica, RAND/UCLA/Harvard Center for Health Care Financing Policy Research, June 1997.
13. Carter G, Relles D, Buchanan J, Donyo T, Inkelas M, Spritzer K: A Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Rehabilitation. Santa Monica, RAND/UCLA/Harvard Center for Health Care Financing Policy Research, June 1997.
14. Stineman MG, Goin JE, Granger CV, Fiedler RC, Williams SV: Discharge motor FIM - function related groups. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:980-985.
15. Johnston MV, Miller LS: Cost-effectiveness of the Medicare three-hour regulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:581-585.
16. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ: Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, Wadsworth International Group, 1984.
17. Harada ND, Sofaer S, Kominski G: Functional status outcomes in rehabilitation: implications for prospective payment. Med Care 1993;31:345-357.
18. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger CV: Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:133-143.
19. Hosek S, Kane R, Carney M, et al.: Charges and Outcomes for Rehabilitative Care: Implications for the Prospective Payment System. Santa Monica, The RAND Corporation, 1986.
20. Brook RH, McGlynn EA, Cleary PD: Measuring quality of care (Part 2). N Engl J Med 1996;335:966-969.
21. National Center for Cost Containment. Stroke/Lower Extremity Amputee Algorithms Guide. Milwaukee, Department of Veterans Affairs, April 1996.
22. Ellwood PM: Outcomes management: a technology of patient experience. N Engl J Med 1988;318:1549-1556.
23. Jewel MA: Quantitative methods for quality improvement. Pharmacotherapy 1995;15:27S-32S.