Phylogenetic analysis of North American Elymus and the monogenomic Triticeae (Poaceae) using three chloroplast DNA data sets

Genome

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 991-1002

  Mason Gamer, Roberta J ^a,b   Orme, Nancy L ^a,c   Anderson, Claire M ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c Highland High School   (United States)

^d BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chloroplast genome; Phylogeny; Polyploidy; Systematics

Indexed keywords

ELYMUS; HORDEUM; POACEAE; PSEUDOROEGNERIA; THINOPYRUM; TRITICEAE;

CHLOROPLAST DNA; PRIMER DNA;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; ELYMUS; GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; POACEAE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

BASE SEQUENCE; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; ELYMUS; PHYLOGENY; POACEAE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0242529224     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/g02-065     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anamthawat-Jónsson, K., and Bödvarsdóttir, S.K. 2001. Genomic and genetic relationships among species of Leymus (Poaceae: Triticeae) inferred from 18S-26S ribosomal genes. Am. J. Bot. 88: 553-559.
2. Barkworth, M.E., and Dewey, D.R. 1985. Genomically based genera in the perennial Triticeae of North America: identification and membership. Am. J. Bot. 72: 767-776.
3. Brochmann, C., Borgen, L., and Stabbetorp, O.E. 2000. Multiple diploid hybrid speciation of the Canary Island endemic Argyranthemum sundingii (Asteraceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 220: 77-92.
4. Bull, J.J., Huelsenbeck, J.P., Cunningham, C.W., Swofford, D.L., and Waddell, P.J. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 34: 384-397.
5. Dewey, D.R. 1982. Genomic and phylogenetic relationships among North American perennial Triticeae. In Grasses and grasslands. Edited by J.R. Estes. Oklahoma University Press, Norman, Okla. pp. 51-88.
6. Dewey, D.R. 1983a. New nomenclatural combinations in the North American perennial Triticeae. Brittonia, 35: 30-33.
7. Dewey, D.R. 1983b. Historical and current taxonomic perspectives of Agropyron, Elymus, and related genera. Crop. Sci. 23: 637-642.
8. Dewey, D.R. 1984. The genomic system of classification as a guide to intergeneric hybridization within the perennial Triticeae. In Gene manipulation in plant improvement. Edited by J.P. Gustafsen. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. pp. 209-279.
9. Doyle, J.J., Doyle, J.L., and Brown, A.H.D. 1999. Origins, colonization, and lineage recombination in a widespread perennial soybean polyploid complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 10 741-10 745.
10. Ge, S., Sang, T., Lu, B.-R., and Hong, D.-Y. 1999. Phylogeny of rice genomes with emphasis on origins of allotetraploid species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 14 400-14 405.
11. Hitchcock, A.S. 1951. Manual of grasses of the United States. 2nd ed. Revised by A. Chase. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
12. Hsiao, C., Chatterton, N.J., Asay, K.H., and Jensen, K.B. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of the monogenomic species of the wheat tribe, Triticeae (Poaceae), inferred from nuclear rDNA (internal transcribed spacer) sequences. Genome, 38: 211-223.
13. Jauhar, P.P. 1988. A reassessment of genome relationships between Thinopyrum bessarabicum and T. elongatum of the Triticeae. Genome, 30: 903-914.
14. Jauhar, P.P. 1990. Multidisciplinary approach to genome analysis in the diploid species, Thinopyrum bessarabicum and T. elongatum (Lophopyrum elongatum) of the Triticeae. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 523-536.
15. Jensen, K.B. 1990a. Cytology and taxonomy of E. grandiglumis, E. alatavicus, and E. batalinii (Poaceae: Triticeae). Genome, 33: 668-673.
16. Jensen, K.B. 1990b. Cytology, fertility, and morphology of Elymus kengii (Keng) Tzvelev and E. grandiglumis (Keng) Á.Löve (Poaceae: Triticeae). Genome, 33: 408-421.
17. Jensen, K.B., and Salomon, B. 1995. Cytogenetics and morphology of Elymus panormitanus var. heterophyllus (Keng) Á.Löve and its relationship to Elymus panormitanus (Poaceae: Triticeae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 156: 731-739.
18. Jensen, K.B., and Wang, R.R.-C. 1997. Cytological and molecular evidence for transferring Elymus coreanus from the genus Elymus to Leymus and molecular evidence for Elymus californicus (Poaceae: Triticeae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 158: 872-877.
19. Jensen, K.B., Liu, Z.W., Lu, B.R., and Salomon, B. 1994. Biosystematic study of hexaploids Elymus tschimganicus and E. glaucissimus. I. Morphology and genomic constitution. Chromosome Res. 2: 209-215.
20. Kearney, M. 2002. Fragmentary taxa, missing data, and ambiguity: mistaken assumptions and conclusions. Syst. Biol. 51: 369-381.
21. Kellogg, E.A., and Appels, R. 1995. Intraspecific and interspecific variation in 5S RNA genes are decoupled in diploid wheat relatives. Genetics, 140: 325-343.
22. Kellogg, E.A., Appels, R., and Mason-Gamer, R.J. 1996. When gene trees tell different stories: the diploid genera of the Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Bot. 21: 321-347.
23. Liu, C.J., and Musial, J.M. 2001. The application of chloroplast DNA clones in identifying maternal donors for polyploid species of Stylosanthes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102: 73-77.
24. Löve, Á. 1982. Generic evolution of the wheatgrasses. Biol. Zentbl. 101: 199-212.
25. Löve, Á. 1984. Conspectus of the Triticeae. Feddes Reppert. 95: 425-521.
26. Mason-Gamer, R.J. 2001. Origin of North American Elymus (Poaceae: Triticeae) allotetraploids based of granule-bound starch synthase gene sequences. Syst. Bot. 26: 757-758.
27. Mason-Gamer, R.J., and Kellogg, E.A. 1996a. Chloroplast DNA analysis of the monogenomic Triticeae: phylogenetic implications and genome-specific markers. In Methods of genome analysis in plants. Edited by P.P. Jauhar. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. pp. 301-325.
28. Mason-Gamer, R.J., and Kellogg, E.A. 1996b. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Biol. 45: 524-545.
29. Mason-Gamer, R.J., and Kellogg, E.A. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of the Triticeae using the starch synthase gene, and a preliminary analysis of some North American Elymus species. In Grasses. Systematics and evolution. Edited by S.W.L. Jacobs and J. Everett. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia. pp. 102-109.
30. Olmstead, R.G., and Sweere, J.A. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43: 467-481.
31. Petersen, G., and Seberg, O. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of the Triticeae based on rpoA sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7: 217-230.
32. Petersen, G., and Seberg, O. 2000. Phylogenetic evidence for excision of Stowaway miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements in Triticeae (Poaceae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 1589-1596.
33. Redinbaugh, M.G., Jones, T.A., and Zhang, Y.T. 2000. Ubiquity of the St chloroplast genome in St-containing Triticeae polyploids. Genome, 43: 846-852.
34. Seberg, O., and Frederiksen, S. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of the monogenomic Triticeae (Poaceae) based on morphology. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 136: 75-97.
35. Seberg, O., and Petersen, G. 1998. A critical review of concepts and methods used in classical genome analysis. Bot. Rev. 64: 373-417.
36. Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.
37. Soltis, D.E., and Soltis, P.S. 1989. Allopolyploid speciation in Tragopogon: insights from chloroplast DNA. Am. J. Bot. 76: 1119-1124.
38. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Ranker, T.A., and Ness, B.D. 1989. Chloroplast DNA variation and multiple origins of autopolyploidy in Heuchera micrantha (Saxifragaceae). Evolution, 43: 650-656.
39. Sun, G.-L., Salomon, B., and von Bothmer, R. 1997. Analysis of tetraploid Elymus species using wheat microsatellite markers and RAPD markers. Genome, 40: 806-814.
40. Svitashev, S., Salomon, B., Bryngelsson, T., and von Bothmer, R. 1996. A study of 28 Elymus species using repetitive DNA sequences. Genome, 39: 1093-1101.
41. Svitashev, S., Bryngelsson, T., Li, X., and Wang, R.R.-C. 1998. Genome-specific repetitive DNA and RAPD markers for genome identification in Elymus and Hordelymus. Genome, 41: 120-128.
42. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
43. Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G., and Bouvet, J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 17: 1105-1109.
44. Templeton, A.R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution, 37: 221-244.
45. Torabinejad, J., and Mueller, R.J. 1993. Genome constitution of the Australian hexaploid grass, Elymus scabrus (Poaceae: Triticeae). Genome, 36: 147-151.
46. Wang, R.R.-C. 1985. Genome analysis of Thinopyrum bessarabicum and T. elongatum. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 27: 722-728.
47. Wang, R.R.-C., and Hsiao, C. 1989. Genome relationship between Thinopyrum bessarabicum and T. elongatum: revisited. Genome, 32: 179-189.
48. Wiens, J. 1998. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy? Syst. Biol. 47: 625-640.
49. Wilkinson, M. Coping with abundant missing entries in phylogenetic inference using parsimony. Syst. Biol. 44: 501-514.