Reduced saliency of peripheral targets in gaze-contingent multi-resolutional displays: Blended versus sharp boundary windows

Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium (ETRA)

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 89-93

  Reingold, Eyal M ^a   Loschky, Lester C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Area of interest; Bi resolution displays; Dual resolution displays; Eye movements; Eyetracking; High detail inset; Multi resolution displays; Peripheral degradation; Peripheral vision; Saliency; Variable resolution displays; Visual perception; Visual search

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; USER INTERFACES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

GAZE-CONTINGENT MULTIRESOLUTIONAL DISPLAYS; SHARP BOUNDARY WINDOWS;

VISION;

EID: 0242527382     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Holmes, D. L., Cohen, K. M., Haith, M. M., and Morrison, F. J. 1977. Peripheral visual processing. Perception and Psychophysics 22, 571-577.
2. Ikeda, M., and Takeuchi, T. 1975. Influence of foveal load on the functional visual field. Perception & Psychophysics 18, 255-260.
3. Loschky, L. C., and McConkie, G. W. 2000 User performance with gaze contingent multiresolutional displays. In Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research & Applications Symposium 2000, ACM, Palm Beach, FL., A. T. Duchowski, Ed., 97-103.
4. Loschky, L. C., and McConkie, G. W. 2001. Investigating spatial vision and dynamic attentional selection using a gaze-contingent multi-resolutional display. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Loschky, L. C., McConkie, G. W., Yang, J., and Miller, M. E. The role of spatial frequency on salience in free viewing of complex images. Poster session presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL, USA.
6. Mackworth, N. H. 1965 Visual noise causes tunnel vision. Psychonomic Science 3, 67-68.
7. Arkhurst, D., Culurciello, E., and Neibur, E. 2000. Evaluating variable resolution displays with visual search: Task performance and eye movements. In Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research & Applications Symposium 2000, ACM, Palm Beach, FL., A. T. Duchowski, Ed., 105-109.
8. Reingold, E. M., Loschky, L. C., McConkie, G. W., and Stampe, D. M. 2001a. Gaze-contingent multi-resolutional displays: An integrative review. Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Toronto.
9. Reingold, E. M., Loschky, L. C., Stampe, D. M., and Shen, J. 2001b. An assessment of a live-video gaze contingent variable resolution display. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ: USA, M. J. Smith, G. Salvendy, D. Harris, and R. J. Koubek, Eds., 1338-1342.
10. Shioiri, S., and Ikeda, M. 1989. Useful resolution for picture perception as a function of eccentricity. Perception 18, 347-361.
11. Turner, J. A. 1984. Evaluation of an eye-slaved area-of-interest display for tactical combat simulation. In The 6th Interservice/Industry Training Equipment Conference and Exhibition, 75-86.
12. van Diepen, P. M. J., and Wampers, M. 1998. Scene exploration with Fourier-filtered peripheral information. Perception 27, 10, 1998, 1141-1151.
13. Watson, B. A., Walker, N., Hodges, L. F., and Worden, A. 1997. Managing level of detail through peripheral degradation: Effects on search performance with a head-mounted display. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 4, 4, 323-346.