Homo erectus calvarium from the Pleistocene of Java

Science

Volumn 299, Issue 5611, 2003, Pages 1384-1388

  Baba, Hisao ^a,b   Aziz, Fachroel ^c   Kaifu, Yousuke ^a   Suwa, Gen ^b   Kono, Reiko T ^a   Jacobs, Teuku ^d  

^a DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c Geological Research and Development Centre Bandung   (Indonesia)

^d GADJAH MADA UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TOMOGRAPHY;

PLEISTOCENE;

BIODIVERSITY;

CRANIUM; EVOLUTION; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOLOGY; PLEISTOCENE;

ARTICLE; CALVARIA; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FOSSIL; HOMO ERECTUS; HYPOTHESIS; MORPHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION; NONHUMAN; PLEISTOCENE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SEDIMENTOLOGY; SKULL BASE; TAXONOMY;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; EVOLUTION; FOSSILS; HOMINIDAE; HUMANS; INDONESIA; MALE; OCCIPITAL BONE; ORBIT; PARIETAL BONE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SKULL; SKULL BASE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

INDONESIA;

HOMO; HOMO ERECTUS; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0242515773     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1081676     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. R. Larick et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 4866 (2001).
2. M. Hyodo et al., J. Hum. Evol. 43, 27 (2002).
3. G. D. Van den Bergh, J. De Vos, P. Y. Sondaar, F. Aziz, Indo-Pac. Prehist. Assoc. Bull. 14, 7 (1996).
4. C. C. Swisher III et al., Science 274, 1870 (1996).
5. A. P. Santa Luca, The Ngandong Fossil Hominids: A Comparative Study of a Far Eastern Homo erectus Group (Department of Anthropology, Yale Univ., New Haven, CT, 1980).
6. M. H. Wotpoff, Paleoanthropology (McGraw-Hill, New York, ed. 2, 1999).
7. S. C. Antón, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 118, 301 (2002).
8. G. P. Rightmire, The Evolution of Homo erectus: Comparative Anatomical Studies of an Extinct Human Species (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1990).
9. B. Asfaw et al., Nature 416, 317 (2002).
10. J. Hawks et al., J. Hum. Evol. 39, 1 (2000).
11. C. Stringer, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 357, 563 (2002).
12. R. L. Holloway, in Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution, A. Lock, C. R. Peters, Eds. (Blackwell, Oxford, 1999), pp. 74-125.
13. T. Jacob, in Homo erectus: Papers in Honor of Davidson Black, B. A. Sigmon, J. S. Cybutski, Eds. (Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada, 1981), pp. 87-104.
14. S. Matsu'ura et al., Curr. Anthropol. 41, 297 (2000).
15. E. Detson et al., Anat. Rec. 262, 380 (2001).
16. Vertebrate fossils recovered from the Sm 4 findspot vary in preservation, suggesting a mixed assemblage composed of fossils from multiple sources upstream. Outcrops that we identified, within 6 km upstream of the find, include those that belong to the traditional Kabuh Formation of this area. On the basis of its adhering matrix, Sm 4 is likely to have derived from this series.
17. F. Weidenreich, Anthropol. Pap. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 43, 205 (1951).
18. F. Weidenreich, Palaeontol. Sin. New Ser. D 10, 1 (1943).
19. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
20. H. Seidler et al., J. Hum. Evol. 33, 691 (1997).
21. Our micro-CT analysis of Ngandong 12 revealed a damaged divus and missing dorsum sellae, tuberculum sellae, and planum sphenoideum regions. This precludes a numerical evaluation of its cranial base flexion. The entire region from the sella turcica to the planum sphenoideum is missing in Sangiran 17. However, the floor of the sella turdca is preserved in Ngandong 12, and the clivus in Sangiran 17, allowing a comparison of approximate alignments with Sm 4 (Fig. 2, G and H). This suggests a cranial base, in both Ngandong 12 and Sangiran 17, that is broadly compatible with the Sm 4 condition of flexion. As far as we are aware, no account of cranial base flexion of Ngandong 7 has been published.
22. C. Ross, M. Henneberg Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 98, 575 (1995).
23. F. Spoor, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Suppl. 30, 288 (2000).
24. D. E. Lieberman, C. F. Ross, M. J. Ravosa, Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol. 43, 117 (2000).
25. D. E. Lieberman, B. M. McBratney, G. Krovitz, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 1134 (2002).
26. In Sm 4, the anterior temporal pole outline intersects the midline cranial base profile close to the tuberculum sellae, whereas the same intersection in modern humans occurs at a position approximately at the middle of the planum sphenoideum (Fig. 2, I and J).
27. F. Spoor, P. O'Higgins, C. Dean, D. E, Lieberman, Nature 397, 572 (1999).
28. M. Bhat, D. E. Enlow, Angle Orthodont. 55, 269 (1985).
29. F. Bookstein et al., Anat. Rec. 257, 217 (1999).
30. S. Antón, S. Marquez, K. Mowbray, J. Hum. Evol. 43, 555 (2002).
31. G. Hewitt, Nature 405, 907 (2000).
32. G. D. van den Bergh, J. de Vos, P. Y. Sondaar, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 171, 385 (2001).
33. F. J. Gathorne-Hardy, Syaukani, R. G. Davies, P. Eggleton, D. T. Jones, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 75, 453 (2002).
34. R. C. McCarthy, J. Hum. Evol. 40, 41 (2001).
35. F. Spoor, S. Afr. J. Sci. 93, 182 (1997).
36. We thank Darsono for the recovery of Sm 4; Sudijono, T. Sihombing I. Kumiawan, A. Hikmat, E. Indriati, A. Suprijo, P. H. Sulistyarto, R. A. Suriyanto, J. M. Susanto, and people of Mlale and Cemeng for fieldwork; J. Arif for access to Tjg-1993.05; H. Otsuka for stratigraphic interpretations; T. Suzuki for observations of possible traumatic bone alteration on Sm 4; F. Spoor for comments on H. erectus cranial base lengths and flexion; S. Matsukawa and M. Chubachi for assistance; and T. White and E. Delson for suggestions. We thank the Geological Research and Development Centre, Bandung, for permission and support. This work was supported by the National Science Museum, Tokyo, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.