Reorganizing Care for the Substance Using Offender - The Case for Collaboration

Federal Probation

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 64-70

  Delany, Peter J ^a   Fletcher, Bennett W ^a   Shields, Joseph J ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE   (United States)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242486484     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andrews, D.A., Zinger, I, Hoge, R.D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F.T. (1990). Does treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
2. Anno, J. Prison Health Care: Guidelines for the Management of an Adequate Delivery System, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections, National Commission on Correctional Health Care.
3. Belenko, S., Peugh, J. (1999). Behind bars: substance abuse and America's prison population, Technical report, New York, NY: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.
4. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1998). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
5. Delany, P., Shields, J. & Fletcher, B. (2003). Special Issues in Treatment: Incarcerated Populations, in A.W. Graham, T.K. Schultz, M.F. Mayo-Smith, R.K. Ries, & B.B. Wilford, (eds.), Principles of Addiction Medicine, 3rd Edition. Chevy Chase, MD., American Society of Addiction Medicine, 553-565.
6. Falkin, G.P., Wexler, H.K. & Lipton, D.S. (1992). Drug treatment in state prisons, in Extent and adequacy of insurance coverage for substance abuse services (Institute of Medicine Report: Treating drug problems Vol. II), NIDA Services Research Series No. 3, Washington, D.C.: Supt of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off.
7. Fletcher, B.W. (in press). The NIDA Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS), Offender Substance Abuse.
8. Gendreau, P. (1996) The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In A. Harland (Ed.), Choosing Correctional Options that Work. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Hiller, M.L., Knight, K., Broome, K.M., & Simpson, D.D. (1996). Compulsory community-based substance abuse treatment and the mentally ill criminal offender. The Prison Journal, 76, 180-191.
10. Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., & Simpson, D.D. (1999), Prison-based substance abuse treatment, residential aftercare and recidivism. Addiction, 94, 833-842.
11. Himmelman, A.T. (1997). Collaboration for a change: Definitions, models, roles and a guide to collaborative processes. Paper presented at the New York State Department of Health Conference - Focusing the Message. Albany, New York.
12. Inciardi, J.A., Martin, S.S., Butzin, C.A. Hooper, R.M., & Harrison, L.D. (1997). An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues, 27(2), 261-278.
13. Konrad, E. (1996). A multidimensional frame-work for conceptualizing human services integrated initiatives. In J. M. Marquart & E. L. Konrad (Eds.), Evaluating initiatives to integrate human services. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Lipton, D.S. (1995). The effectiveness of treatment for drug abusers under criminal justice super-vision. Research Report. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
15. McClintock, C. (1998). Healthy Communities: Concepts and Collaboration Tools, Summary Report, Cross-Agency Collaboration: Research Findings and Practitioner Experience, New York State College of Human Ecology, Policy Perspectives.
16. McDonald, D.C. (1995). Managing Prison Health Care and Costs, Research Report: Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
17. McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O'Brien CP, Kleber HD (2000). Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA. 2000; 284:1689-1695.
18. Mumola, C.J. (1999). Substance Abuse and Treatment, State and Federal Prisoners in 1997. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
19. NIDA (1999). Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research-Based Guide, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20. Pelissier, B., & McCarthy, D. Evaluation of the Federal Bureau of Prisons Drug Treatment Programs. In: Leukefeld, C.G., & Tims, F.M., eds. Drug Abuse Treatment in Prisons and Jails. NIDA Research Monograph 118. Washington, DC: Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print Off., 1992. pp. 261-278.
21. Peters, R.H. & Steinberg, M.L. (2000). Substance abuse treatment services in U.S. Prisons. In D. Shewan &J. Deavies (Eds.), Drugs and Prisons. 89-116. London, U.K.: Harwood Academic Publishers.
22. Prendergast, M.L. and Burdon, W.M. (2002). Integrated systems of care for substance-abusing offenders, in Leukefeld, C.G., Tims, F. and Farabee, D. (eds.). Treatment of Drug Offenders: Policies and Issues (pp. 11-126), New York, NY: Springer Publishing Co.
23. Schorr, L.B. (1997). Common Purpose: Strengthening families and neighborhoods to rebuild America. New York: Doubleday.
24. Sherman, L.W., Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, D., Eck, J, Reuter, P. & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's promising: Report to Congress. Washington D.C.: Office of Justice Programs.
25. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Office of Applied Studies (2002). Results from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Volume I. Summary of National Findings. Rockville, MD. Office of Applied Studies.
26. Travis, J. (2000). But they all come back: Rethinking prisoner reentry. U.S. Department of Justice: Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
27. Wexler, H.K., Lipton, D.S., and Johnson, B.D. (1988). A Criminal Justice System Strategy for Treating Cocaine-Heroin Abusing Offenders in Custody. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of State.