If it Walks Like a Duck: Nanosensor Threat Assessment

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5090, Issue , 2003, Pages 341-347

  Chachis, George C ^a  

^a System Resources Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

Nanosensors; Self organization; Smart sensor networks; Threat assessment; Unattended sensors

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; MICROELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES; SECURITY OF DATA; SENSOR DATA FUSION;

NANOSENSORS; SMART SENSOR NETWORKS;

SENSORS;

EID: 0242472793     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.485734     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. J. Agre, L. Clare, "An Integrated Architecture for Cooperative Sensing Networks," Computer, 33,5, pp. 106-108, 2000.
2. T. Bass, "Intrusion Detection Systems and Multisensor Data Fusion," Communications of the ACM, 43, 4, pp. 99-105, 2000.
3. C. Bourjot, V. Chevrier, V. Thomas, "How Social Spiders Inspired An Approach to Region Detection," AAMAS '02, pp. 426-433, ACM, Bologna, Italy, 2002.
4. D. Carman, P. Kraus, B. Matt, "Constraints and Approaches for Distributed Network Security," NAI Labs Technical Report #00-010, Network Associates Inc., Glenwood, MD, 2000.
5. G. Chachis, "Nanosoftware: All for One or One for All?" Nanotech 2002 Proceedings, Houston, TX, 2002.
6. G. Chachis, "Ants on the Wall: self-organization software and Very-Small sensors for aviation security," Proceedings of the FAA's Third International Aviation Technology Security Symposium. Federal Aviation Administration, Atlantic City, NJ, 2001.
7. S. Forrest, S. Hofmeyer, "Immunology as Information Processing," Design Principles for the Immune System and Other Distributed Autonomous Systems, L. Segal, I. Cohen, pp.361-387, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.
8. M. Greenfield, Signalers and Receivers: Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.
9. P. Hamrer, P. Williams, G. Gunsch, G. Lamont, "An Artificial Immune System Architecture for Computer Security Applications," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computing, 6,3, pp. 252-280, 2002.
10. J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, D. Culer, K. Pister, "System Architecture Directions for Networked Sensors," Proceeding of ASPLOS-IX, ACM, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
11. B. Holldobler, E. Wilson, The Ants, C Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
12. I. Raicu, O. Richter, L. Schwiebert, S. Zeadally, "Using Wireless Sensors to Narrow the Gap between Low-Level Information and Context-Awareness," http: newslab.cswayne.edu/wsnraicu.pdf, 2001.
13. J. Sauter, R. Matthews, H. Parunak, S. Breuckner, "Evolving Adaptive Pheromone Path Planning Mechanisms," AAMAS '02, pp. 434-440, ACM, Bologna, Italy, 2002.
14. Segel, L.A. (2001). Diffuse Feedback from a Diffuse Informational Network: In the Immune System and Other Distributed Autonomous Systems," Design Principles for the Immune System and Other Distributed Autonomous Systems, L. Segal, I. Cohen, pp. 203-226,: Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.
15. J. Sun, K. Shida, "Multilayer Sensing and Aggregation Approach to Environmental Perception With One Multifunctional Sensor," IEEE Sensors Journal, 2, 2, pp. 62-72 2002.
16. S. Thrun, "Probababilistic Robots," Communications of the ACM, 45, 3, pp. 52-57, 2002.
17. P. Varshney,Distributed Detection and Data Fusion, Springer-Verlag, NY, 1997.
18. W. Zhang, Z. Deng, G. Wang, L. Wittenburg, Z. Xing, "Distributed Problem Solving in Sensor Networks," AAMAS '02, pp. 988-989, ACM, Bologna, Italy, 2002.