Ethylene-Promoted Intermolecular Enyne Metathesis

Organic Letters

Volumn 5, Issue 21, 2003, Pages 3819-3822

  Giessert, Anthony J ^a   Brazis, Nicholas J ^a   Diver, Steven T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

1,3 BUTADIENE; ALKYNE; CARBENOID; ETHYLENE; RUTHENIUM;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); MOLECULAR INTERACTION; RING CLOSING METATHESIS;

ALKADIENES; ALKYNES; CATALYSIS; ETHERS; ETHYLENES; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; RUTHENIUM COMPOUNDS; VINYL COMPOUNDS;

EID: 0242460343     PISSN: 15237060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ol035270b     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Reviews: (a) Mori, M. Top. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 1, 133-154. (b) Poulsen, C. S.; Madsen, R. Synthesis 2003, 1-18.
2. Reviews: (a) Mori, M. Top. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 1, 133-154. (b) Poulsen, C. S.; Madsen, R. Synthesis 2003, 1-18.
3. Stragies, R.; Schuster, M.; Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2518-2520.
4. Mori, M.; Sakakibara, N.; Kinoshita, A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6082-6083.
5. (a) Kinoshita, A.; Sakakibara, N.; Mori, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12388-12389.
6. (b) Kinoshita, A.; Sakakibara, N.; Mori, M. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 8155-8167.
7. (c) Smulik, J. A.; Diver, S. T. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1788-1792.
8. (d) Smulik, J. A.; Diver, S. T. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2271-2274.
9. (e) Tonogaki, K.; Mori, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 2235-2238.
10. (a) Mori, M.; Kitamura, T.; Sakakibara, N.; Sato, Y. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 543-545.
11. (b) Mori, M.; Kitamura, T.; Sato, Y. Synthesis 2001, 654-664.
12. Lee, H.-Y.; Kim, B. G.; Snapper, M. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1855-1858.
13. Under previously reported conditions, these alkynes either did not react or decomposed. See: Giessert, A. J.; Snyder, L.; Markham, J.; Diver, S. T. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1793-1796.
14. Smulik, J. A.; Giessert, A. J.; Diver, S. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 209-211.
15. Louie, J.; Grubbs, R. H. Organometallics 2002, 27, 2153-2164.
16. Difficult metatheses have been repeated using at least two separate batches of second-generation catalyst.
17. Fewer equivalents of enol ether and ethylene pressure (60 psig or higher) produced a greater proportion of the butadiene.
18. 2 versus mesitylene as an internal standard.
19. (a) Garber, S. B.; Kingsbury, J. S.; Gray, B. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8168-8179.
20. (b) Gessler, S.; Randl, S.; Blechert, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9973-9976.
21. (c) Love, J. A.; Morgan, J. P.; Trnka, T. M.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4035-4037.
22. Ruckert, A.; Eisele, D.; Blechert, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5245-5247.