Directly assessing the relationship between irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 56, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1269-1278

  Neath, Ian ^a   Farley, Lisa A ^a   Surprenant, Aimée M ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; HEARING; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SPEECH; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CUES; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0242456026     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980244000756     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 544-549.
2. Colle, H. A., & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 17-31.
3. Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 75-84.
4. Drewnowski, A., & Murdoch, B. B. Jr. (1980). The role of auditory features in memory span for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 319-332.
5. Ellermeier, W., & Zimmer, K. (1997). Individual differences in susceptibility to the "irrelevant speech effect." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2191-2199.
6. Jones, D. M., & Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 544-558.
7. Larsen, J. D., & Baddeley, A. (2003). Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: Do they have a common source? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1249-1268.
8. LeCompte, D. C., & Shaibe, D. M. (1997). On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 100-118.
9. Logie, R. H., Della Sala, S., Laiacona, M., Chalmers, P., & Wynn, V. (1996). Group aggregates and individual reliability: The case of verbal short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 24, 305-321.
10. Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (1995). Functional characteristics of the inner voice and the inner ear: Single or double agency? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 436-448.
11. Murray, D. J. (1968). Articulation and acoustic confusability in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 679-684.
12. Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 251-269.
13. Neath, I. (2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 403-423.
14. Peterson, L. R., & Johnson, S. T. (1971). Some effects of minimizing articulation on short-term retention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 346-354.
15. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164.
16. Surprenant, A. M., LeCompte, D. C., & Neath, I. (2000). Manipulations of irrelevant information: Suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 325-348.
17. Surprenant, A.M., Neath, I., & LeCompte, D. C. (1999). Irrelevant speech, phonological similarity, and presentation modality. Memory, 7, 405-420.