High-resolution spatial analysis of stomatal ozone uptake in arable crops and pastures

Environment International

Volumn 29, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 385-392

  Nussbaum, S ^a   Remund, J ^b   Rihm, B ^c   Mieglitz, K ^b   Gurtz, J ^b   Fuhrer, Juerg ^a  

^a Research Station ART Air Pollution and Climate Group   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c Meteotest   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Grasslands; Ozone; Ozone flux; Ozone risk assessments; Wheat

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERICS; PLANTS (BOTANY); RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL MECHANICS; VEGETATION;

SOIL MOISTURE;

OZONE;

OZONE;

OZONE;

AGRICULTURE; AIR ANALYSIS; AIR MONITORING; AIR POLLUTION; ATMOSPHERIC TRANSPORT; CANOPY; CHEMICAL SINK; CLOVER; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROP PRODUCTION; DATA ANALYSIS; GRASSLAND; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PASTURE; PLANT STOMA; PRECIPITATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL MOISTURE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; SWITZERLAND; WHEAT; WIND;

TRIFOLIUM; TRITICUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 0242432468     PISSN: 01604120     EISSN: 18736750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00174-5     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Avissar R. Observations of leaf stomatal conductance at the canopy scale: an atmospheric modeling perspective. Bound Layer Meteorol 1993;64: 127-48.
2. Baldocchi DD, Hicks BB, Camara P. A canopy stomatal resistance model for gaseous deposition to vegetated surfaces. Atmos Environ 1987;21: 91-101.
3. Brook JR, Zhang L, Di-Giovanni F, Padro J. Description and evaluation of a model of deposition velocities for routine estimates of air pollution dry deposition over North America: Part I. Model development. Atmos Environ 1999;33:5037-51.
4. Campbell GS, Norman JM. An introduction to environmental biophysics. New York: Springer; 1998.
5. Emberson LD, (1996). Defining and mapping relative potential sensitivity of European vegetation to ozone. PhD thesis, Center for Environmental Technology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK.
6. Emberson LD, Ashmore MR, Cambridge HM, Simpson D, Tuovinen JP. Modelling stomatal ozone flux across Europe. Environ Pollut 2000; 109:403-13.
7. Erisman JW, Van Pul A, Wyers P. Parameterization of surface resistance for the quantification of atmospheric deposition of acidifying pollutants and ozone. Atmos Environ 1994;28:2595-607.
8. Fuhrer J, Achermann B. Critical levels for ozone-level II. Environmental Documentation, vol. 115. Bern, Switzerland: Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape; 1999.
9. Fuhrer J, Grandjean Grimm A, Tschannen W, Shariat-Madari H. The response of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to ozone at higher elevations: II. Changes in yield, yield components and grain quality in response to ozone flux. New Phytol 1992;121:211-9.
10. Fuhrer J, Skärby L, Ashmore M. Critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation in Europe. Environ Pollut 1997;97:91-106.
11. Grünhage L, Jäger HJ. Influence of the atmospheric conductivity on the ozone exposure of plants under ambient conditions: considerations for establishing ozone standards to protect vegetation. Environ Pollut 1994;85:125-9.
12. Grünhage L, Haenel H-D. PLATIN (plant-atmosphere interaction) I: a model of plant-atmosphere interaction for estimating absorbed doses of gaseous air pollutants. Environ Pollut 1997;98:37-50.
13. Grünhage L, Jäger HJ, Haenel HD, Löpmeier FJ, Hanewald K. The European critical levels for ozone: improving their usage. Environ Pollut 1999;105:163-73.
14. Grüters U, Fangmeier A, Jäger HJ. Modelling stomatal responses of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L cv Turbo) to ozone and different levels of water supply. Environ Pollut 1995;87:141-9.
15. Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 1996;108:389-411.
16. Jarvis PG. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Phil Trans Roy Soc. London 1976;B273:593-610.
17. Laisk A. Ozone concentration in leaf intercellular air spaces is close to zero. Plant Physiol 1989;90:1163-7.
18. Lambert R, Peeters A, Toussaint B. LAI evolution of a perennial ryegrass crop estimated from the sum of temperatures in spring time. Agric For Meteorol 1999;97:1-8.
19. Matheron G. The theory of regionalised variables and its applications. Les Cahiers du Centre Morphologique Mathématique de Fontainebleau vol, 5. Paris: France Ecole des Mines de Paris; 1982.
20. Massman WJ, Grantz DA. Estimating canopy conductance to ozone uptake from observations of evapotranspiration at the canopy scale and at the leaf scale. Global Change Biol 1995;1:183-98.
21. Monteith JL. Evaporation and environment. In: Fogg GE, editor. The state and movement of water in living organisms. Proc. XIX Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology, vol. 19. Cambridge, UK: University Press; 1965. p. 205-34.
22. Musselman RC, Massmann WJ. Ozone flux to vegetation and its relationship to plant response and ambient air quality standards. Atmos Environ 1999;33:65-73.
23. Nussbaum S, Fuhrer J. Difference in ozone uptake in grassland species between open-top chambers and ambient air. Environ Pollut 2000;109: 463-71.
24. Owen PR, Thompson WR. Heat transfer across rough surfaces. J Fluid Mech 1963;15:321-34.
25. Pio CA, Feliciano MS, Vermeulen AT, Sousa EC. Seasonal variability of ozone dry deposition under southern European climate conditions, in Portugal. Atmospheric Environment 2000;34(2):195-205.
26. Pleijel H. A suggestion of a simple transfer function for the use of ozone monitoring data in dose-response relationships obtained using open-top chambers. Water Air Soil Pollut 1998;102:61-74.
27. Pleijel H, Gelang J, Danielsson H, Sellden G, Karlsson GP, Karlsson PE. An ozone flux-response relationship for wheat. Environ Pollut 2000; 109:453-62.
28. Rosset M, Riedo M, Grub A, Geissmann M, Fuhrer J. Seasonal variation in radiation and energy balances of permanent pastures at different altitudes. Agric For Meteorol 1997;86:245-58.
29. Schulla J. Hydrologische Modellierung von Flussgebieten zur Abschätzung der folgen von Klimaänderungen. Zürcher Geografische Schriften vol. 69. Zürich, Switzerland: Geografisches Institut der ETH Zürich; 1997.
30. Schulze ED, Kelliher FM, Körner C, Lloyd J, Leuning R. Relationships among maximum stomatal conductance, ecosystem surface conductance, carbon assimilation rate, and plant nitrogen nutrition: a global ecology scaling exercise. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1994;25:629-60.
31. Stocker DW, Stedman DH, Zeller KF, Massman WJ, Fox DG. Fluxes of nitrogen oxides and ozone measured by eddy correlation over a short grass prairie. J Geophys Res 1993;98:12619-30.
32. Tuovinen JP. Assessing vegetation exposure to ozone: properties of the AOT40 index and modifications by deposition modelling. Environ Pollut 2000;109:361-72.
33. Tuovinen JP, Aurela M, Laurila T. Resistances to ozone deposition to a flark fen in the northern aapa mire zone. J Geophys Res 1998;103: 16953-66.
34. Wesely ML. Parametrization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models. Atmos Environ 1989;23: 1293-304.
35. Wesely ML, Hicks BB. A review of the current status of knowledge on dry deposition. Atmos Environ 2000;34:2261-82.
36. 3 dry deposition velocities. Atmos Environ 1996;30:339-45.