Cellular automata for the network researcher

Journal of Mathematical Sociology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 263-278

  Bonacich, Phillip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellular automata; Networks; Simulations; Transitivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242427474     PISSN: 0022250X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222500390245349     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
2. Axelrod, R. (1997). The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-based Models of Cooperation and Competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Bonacich, P. (2001). The evolution of exchange networks: A simulation study. Journal of Social Structure. http://www2.heinz.cmu.edu/project/INSNA/joss/index1.html. Vol. 2. No. 5.
4. Bonacich, P. (In Press). Social capital in exchange networks: A simulation study of network evolution. In H. Flap and B. Volker (eds.). Creation and Returns of Social Capital.
5. Busacker, R. G. & Saaty, T. L. (1965). Finite Graphs and Networks: An Introduction with Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Cederman, L.-E. (1997). Emergent Actors in World Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Chwe, M. (2000). Communication and coordination in social networks. Review of Economic Studies, 67, 1-16.
8. Cook, K. S., Emerson, R. M., Gillmore, M. R., & Yamagishi, T. (1983). The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 275-305.
9. Flache, A. & Hegselmann, R. (2001). Do irregular grids make a difference? Relaxing the spatial regularity assumption in cellular models. JASSS. 4(4).
10. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 1287-1303.
11. Hegselmann, R. (1996). Cellular automata in the social sciences - perspectives, restrictions, and artifacts. In R. Hegselmann, U. Mueller, and K. G. Troitzsch (eds.). Modeling and Simulations in the Social Sciences from a Philosophy of Science Point of View (pp. 209-37). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Hegselmann, R. (1998), Modeling social dynamics by cellular automata. In W. B. G. Jackson, M. Liebrand, A. Nowak, and R. Hegselmann (eds.). Computer Modeling of Social Processes (pp 37-64). London: Sage.
13. Hegselmann, R., Flache, A., & Möller, V. (2000). Cellular automata as a modeling tool: Solidarity and opinion formation. In R. Suleiman, R. G. Troitzsch, and N. Gilbert (eds.). Tools and Techniques for Social Science Simulation (pp. 151-178). New York: Physica-Verlag.
14. Laumann, E. O. (1973). Bonds of pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. New York: Wiley.
15. Markovsky, B., Wilier, D., & Patton, T. (1988). Power relations in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 53, 220-236.
16. Nowak, A. & Lewenstein, M. (1996). Modeling social change with cellular automata. In R. Hegselmann, U. Mueller, and K. G. Troitzsch (eds.). Modeling and Simulation in the Social Sciences from a Philosophy of Science Point of View (pp. 249-285). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
17. Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143-186.
18. Takahashi, N. (2000). The emergence of generalized exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1105-34.
19. Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Watts, D. J. (1999). Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.