Fetal cardiographic monitoring during 1.5-T MR imaging

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 180, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1159-1164

  Michel, Sven C A ^a   Rake, Annett ^b   Keller, Thomas M ^a   Huch, Renate ^b   König, Volker ^b   Seifert, Burkhardt ^c   Marincek, Borut ^a   Kubik Huch, Rahel A ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d Kantonsspital Baden   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS MONITORING; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IONIZING RADIATION; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRENATAL EXPOSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SAFETY; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; ADOLESCENT; ARTIFACT; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FETUS HEART RATE; FETUS MOVEMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; PELVIMETRY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; TRANSDUCER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTIFACTS; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FETAL MONITORING; FETAL MOVEMENT; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PELVIMETRY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, THIRD; TRANSDUCERS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 0037379239     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.4.1801159     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Levine D, Barnes PD, Sher S, et al. Fetal fast MR imaging: reproducibility, technical quality, and conspicuity of anatomy. Radiology 1998;2:549-554
2. Sporri S, Hanggi W, Braghetti A, Vock P, Schneider H. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1997;6:902-908
3. Reid A, Smith FW, Hutchison JM. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and its safety implications: follow-up of 181 patients. Br J Radiol 1982;658:784-786
4. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR, Gowland PA, Mansfield P. A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1:32-33
5. Shellock FG, Schaefer DJ, Kanal E. Physiologic responses to an MR imaging procedure performed at a specific absorption rate of 6.0 W/kg. Radiology 1994;3:865-868
6. Budinger TF. Emerging nuclear magnetic resonance technologies: health and safety. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1992;649:1-18
7. Poutamo J, Partanen K, Vanninen R, Vainio P, Kirkinen P. MR imaging does not change fetal cardiotocographic parameters. Prenat Diagn 1998;11:1149-1154
8. Shakespeare SA, Moore RJ, Crowe JA, Gowland PA, Hayes-Gill BR. A method for foetal heart rate monitoring during magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler sonography. Physiol Meas 1999;4:363-368
9. Rooth G, Huch A, Huch R. FIGO workshop on the methodology of measuring and reporting infant growth in the perinatal period: International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. East Afr Med J 1987;2:164-174
10. Vadeyar SH, Moore RJ, Strachan BK, et al. Effect of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;3:666-669
11. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: guidance for the submission of premarket notification for magnetic resonance diagnostic devices. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration, 1998;1:1-94
12. Michel SC, Rake A, Gotzmann L, et al. Pelvimetry and patient acceptability compared between open 0.5-T and closed 1.5-T MR systems. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2898-2905