Influence of boundary conditions uncertainties on the simulation of ventilated enclosures

Numerical Heat Transfer; Part A: Applications

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 483-504

  Teodosiu, Cătălin ^a   Rusaouën, Gilles ^a   Hohotă, Raluca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THERMAL EFFECTS; VELOCITY;

DIFFERENTIATION ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

HEAT TRANSFER;

EID: 0242415183     PISSN: 10407782     EISSN: 15210634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713838253     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. P. Aude, Contribution à l’amélioration des protocoles de validation des modèles numériques de simulation du comportement thermo-aeraulique des bâtiments, Ph.D. thesis, INSA de Lyon, France, 1998.
2. S. Lepers, Modelisation des écoulements de l’air dans les bâtiments à l’aide des codes CFD, Contribution a l’elaboration d’un protocole de validation, Ph.D. thesis, INSA de Lyon, France, 2000.
3. D. M. Hamby, A Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Techniques, Health Phys. vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 195-204, 1995.
4. S. Castanet, Contribution a l’etude de la ventilation et de la qualite de l’air interieur des locaux, Ph.D. thesis, INSA de Lyon, France, 1998.
5. C. Teodosiu, Modelisation des systemes techniques dans le domaine des equipements des bâtiments a l’aide des codes de type CFD, Ph.D. thesis, INSA de Lyon, France, 2001.
6. K. J. Lomas and H. Eppel, Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Building Thermal Simulation Programs, Energy and Buildings, vol. 19, pp. 21-44, 1992.
7. S. Wit, Influence of Modelling Uncertainties on the Simulation of Building Thermal Comfort Performance, Proc. Building Simulation’97 Conf., Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 95-102, 1997.
8. I. Macdonald, J. A. Clarke, and P. Strachan, Assessing Uncertainty in Building Simulation, Proc. Building Simulation’99 Conf., Kyoto, Japan, pp. 683-690, 1999.
9. M. M. Tiller and J. A. Dantzig, Implementation of Design Sensitivity Analysis and Numerical Optimization in Engineering Analysis, Appl. Math. Modelling, vol. 20, pp. 792-799, 1996.
10. N. Rahni, N. Ramdani, Y. Candau, and P. Dalicieux, Application of Group Screening to Dynamic Buildings Energy Simulation Models, J. Stat. Comput. Simulation, vol. 57, no. 1-4, pp. 285-295, 1997.
11. R. Tomovic and M. Vukobratovic, General Sensitivity Theory, Elsevier, New York, 1973.
12. G. J. Prokopakis, Decoupled Direct Method for the Solution of Ordinary Boundary Value Problems, Appl. Math. Modelling, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 499-503, 1993.
13. S. Chinchalkar, The Application of Automatic Differentiation to Problems in Engineering Analysis, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 188, pp. 197-207, 1994.
14. C. Bischof, A. Carle, P. Khademi, and A. Mauer, ADIFOR 2.0: Automatic Differentiation of Fortran 77 Programs, IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 18-32, 1996.
15. C. Bischof, L. Roh, and A. Mauer, ADIC—An Extensible Automatic Differentiation Tool for ANSI—C. Software—Practice and Experience, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1427-1456, 1997.
16. C. Bischof, G. Corliss, L. Green, A. Griewank, K. Haigler, and P. Newman, Automatic Differentiation of Advanced CFD Codes for Multidisciplinary Design, J. Comput. Syst. Eng., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 625-638, 1992.
17. G. Lawrence, P. Newman, and K. Haigler, Sensitivity Derivatives for Advanced CFD Algorithm and Viscous Modeling Parameters via Automatic Differentiation, Proc. 11th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conf., Orlando, FL, Paper 93-3321, 1993.
18. P. Aude, P. Depecker, and G. Krauss, Modelisation et incertitude: comparaison de deux methodes pour l’estimation de la confiance des résultats des modules numeriques, J. Phys. III (The European Physical Journal—Applied Physics), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 179-193, 1997.
19. M. H. Kalos and P. A. Whitlock, Monte Carlo Methods: Basics, Wiley, New York, 1986.
20. S. Fishman, Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.
21. M. Stein, Large Sample Properties of Simulations Using Latin Hypercube Sampling, Technometrics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 143-151, 1987.
22. W. L. Loh, On Latin Hypercube Sampling, Ann. Stat., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 2058-2080, 1996.
23. G. E. P. Box and N. R. Draper, Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, Wiley, New York, 1987.
24. R. H. Myres and D. C. Montgomery, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, Wiley, New York, 1995.
25. G. J. McRae, J. W. Tilden, and J. H. Seinfeld, Global Sensitivity Analysis—A Computational Implementation of the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST), Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15-25, 1982.
26. A. D. Irving, Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis, Appl. Math. Modelling, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3-15, 1992.
27. J. C. Lam and S. C. M. Hui, Sensitivity Analysis of Energy Performance of Office Buildings, Building and Environment, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 27-39, 1996.
28. G. Guyon and N. Rahni, Validation of a Building Thermal Model in Clim2000 Simulation Software Using Full-Scale Experimental Data, Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Analysis, Proc. Building Simulation’97 Conf., Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 47-54, 1997.
29. R. Borchiellini and J. M. Fiirbringer, An Evaluation of a Multizone Air Flow Model, Energy and Buildings, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 35-51, 1999.
30. P. Aude, L. Tabary, and P. Depecker, Sensitivity Analysis and Validation of Buildings Thermal Models Using Adjoint-Code Method, Energy and Buildings, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 267-283, 2000.
31. I. Macdonald and P. Strachan, Practical Application of Uncertainty Analysis, Energy and Buildings, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 219-227, 2001.