Selfish DNA is maladaptive: Evidence from the plant Red List

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 609-614

  Vinogradov, Alexander E ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANGIOSPERM; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; GENOME SIZE; LIFE CYCLE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT EVOLUTION; PLANT GENETICS; POLYPLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK; SPECIES EXTINCTION;

EMBRYOPHYTA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 0242380288     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2003.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bennett M.D. Plant genome values: how much do we know? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:1998;2011-2016.
2. Petrov D.A. Evolution of genome size: new approaches to an old problem. Trends Genet. 17:2001;23-28.
3. Grime J.P., Mowforth M.A. Variation in genome size - an ecological interpretation. Nature. 299:1982;151-153.
4. MacGillivray C.W., Grime J.P. Genome size predicts frost resistance in British herbaceous plants: implications for rates of vegetation response to global warming. Funct. Ecol. 9:1995;320-325.
5. Vinogradov A.E. Nucleotypic effect in homeotherms: body mass-corrected basal metabolic rate of mammals is related to genome size. Evolution. 49:1995;1249-1259.
6. Wakamiya I., et al. Pine genome size diversity and water relations. Physiol. Plant. 96:1996;13-20.
7. Doolittle W.F., Sapienza C. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature. 284:1980;601-603.
8. Orgel L.E., Crick F.H. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature. 284:1980;604-607.
9. Bennetzen J.L., Kellogg E.A. Do plants have a one-way ticket to genomic obesity? Plant Cell. 9:1997;1509-1514.
10. Bennetzen J.L. Mechanisms and rates of genome expansion and contraction in flowering plants. Genetica. 115:2002;29-36.
11. Muller H.J. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat. Res. 1:1964;2-9.
12. Leslie J.F., Vrijenhoek R.C. Consideration of Muller's ratchet mechanism through studies of genetic linkage and genomic compatibilities in clonally reproducing Poeciliopsis. Evolution. 34:1980;1105-1115.
13. Rice W.R. Degeneration of a nonrecombining chromosome. Science. 263:1994;230-232.
14. Vinogradov A.E., Chubinishvili A.T. Genome reduction in a hemiclonal frog Rana esculenta from radioactively contaminated areas. Genetics. 151:1999;1123-1125.
15. Rice W.R., Chippindale A.K. Sexual recombination and the power of natural selection. Science. 294:2001;555-559.
16. Hickey D. Selfish DNA: a sexually transmitted nuclear parasite. Genetics. 101:1982;519-531.
17. Zeyl C., et al. Sex and the spread of retrotransposon Ty3 in experimental populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 143:1996;1567-1577.
18. Burt A., Trivers R. Selfish DNA and breeding system in flowering plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 265:1998;141-146.
19. Arkhipova I., Meselson M. Transposable elements in sexual and ancient asexual taxa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:2000;14473-14477.
20. Wright S., Finnegan D. Genome evolution: sex and the transposable element. Curr. Biol. 11:2001;R296-R299.
21. Sternberg R. On the roles of repetitive DNA elements in the context of a unified genomic-epigenetic system. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 981:2002;154-188.
22. Harvey P.H., Pagel M.D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. 1991;Oxford University Press.
23. Vinogradov A.E. Genome size and GC-percent in vertebrates as determined by flow cytometry: the triangular relationship. Cytometry. 31:1998;100-109.
24. Vinogradov A.E. Mirrored genome size distributions in monocot and dicot plants. Acta Biotheor. 49:2001;43-51.
25. Leitch I.J., et al. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Ann. Bot. 82:(Suppl. A):1998;85-94.
26. Gould S.J., Lloyd E.A. Individuality and adaptation across levels of selection: How shall we name and generalize the unit of Darwinism? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;11904-11909.
27. Graur D., et al. Deletions in processed pseudogenes accumulate faster in rodents than in humans. J. Mol. Evol. 28:1989;279-285.
28. Petrov D.A., et al. High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila. Nature. 384:1996;346-349.
29. Petrov D.A., et al. Evidence for DNA loss as a determinant of genome size. Science. 287:2000;1060-1062.
30. Kirik A., et al. Species-specific double-strand break repair and genome evolution in plants. EMBO J. 19:2000;5562-5566.
31. Vinogradov A.E. Growth and decline of introns. Trends Genet. 18:2002;232-236.
32. Devos K.M., et al. Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis. Genome Res. 12:2002;1075-1079.
33. Kellogg E.A. Relationships of cereal crops and other grasses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:1998;2005-2010.
34. Wendel J.F., et al. Feast and famine in plant genomes. Genetica. 115:2002;37-47.
35. Venter J.C., et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 291:2001;1304-1351.
36. Bennett M.D. Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 181:1972;109-135.
37. Vinogradov A.E. Genome in toto. Genome. 42:1999;361-362.
38. Szarski H. Cell size and the concept of wasteful and frugal evolutionary strategies. J. Theor. Biol. 105:1983;201-209.
39. Vinogradov A.E. Buffering: a possible passive-homeostasis role for redundant DNA. J. Theor. Biol. 193:1998;197-199.
40. Bennett M.D., et al. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms and their modern uses - 807 new estimates. Ann. Bot. 86:2000;859-909.
41. Beissinger S.R. Ecological mechanisms of extinction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:2000;11688-11689.
42. Owens I.P., Bennett P.M. Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced predators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:2000;12144-12148.
43. Strahm W. Greening the red list. World Conserv. 3:2001;13.
44. SanMiguel P., et al. The paleontology of intergene retrotransposons of maize: dating the strata. Nat. Gen. 20:1998;43-45.
45. Walbot V., Petrov D.A. Gene galaxies in the maize genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;8163-8164.
46. Zuckerkandl E. Why so many noncoding nucleotides? The eukaryote genome as an epigenetic machine. Genetica. 115:2002;105-129.
47. Woodruff D.S. Declines of biomes and biotas and the future of evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;5471-5476.
48. Jablonski D. Lessons from the past: Evolutionary impacts of mass extinctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;5393-5398.
49. Raup D.M. The role of extinction in evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91:1994;6758-6763.