Validity and Community-Health-Nursing Sensitivity of Six Outcomes for Community Health Nursing with Older Clients

Public Health Nursing

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 385-398

  Head, Barbara J ^a,c   Maas, Meridean ^b   Johnson, Marion ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Community public health nursing effectiveness; Content validity; Elderly clients at home; Nursing sensitive client outcomes; Standardized nursing language

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELDERLY CARE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING; POSTAL MAIL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RURAL AREA;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; CURRICULUM; DATA COLLECTION; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; GERIATRIC NURSING; HUMANS; IOWA; NURSE CLINICIANS; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF CARE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0242362669     PISSN: 07371209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2003.20507.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. American Nurses Credentialing Center Commission on Certification. (2001). Ancc Certification: Clinical Nurse Specialist, Nursing Administration, Specialty Nursing and Modular Certification Exams. Washington, DC: American Nurses Credentialing Center.
2. American Public Health Association (1996). The definition and role of public health nursing: A statement of APHA Public Health Nursing Section. Mimeographed.
3. Association of Community Health Nursing Educators (2000). Research priorities for public health nursing. Pensacola, FL: Association of Community Health Nursing Educators.
4. Aydelotte, M. (1962). The use of patient welfare as a criterion measure. Nursing Research, 11, 10-14.
5. Barkauskas, V. H. (1983). Effectiveness of public health home visits to primiparous mothers and their infants. American Journal of Public Health, 73(5), 573-580.
6. Bowles, K. H. (1999). The Omaha System: Bridging hospital and home care. On-Line Journal of Nursing Informatics 3(1). Available: http://cac.psu.edu/ ~dxm12/art2v3n1art.html Accessed June 6, 2003.
7. Braden, J., & VanNostrand, J. F. (1993). Long term care. In J. F. VanNostrand (Ed.). Common Beliefs About the Rural Elderly: What Do National Data Tell Us? (pp. 63-69). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
8. Bushy, A. (1992). Rural nursing research priorities. JONA'S Healthcare Law, Ethics and Regulation, 22(1), 50-56.
9. Center for Nursing Classification (2001). Users of NIC [Nursing Interventions Classification]; Users of NOC [Nursing Outcomes Classification]. Mimeographed.
10. Clark, J., & Lang, N. (1992). Nursing's next advance: An international classification for nursing practice. International Nursing Review, 39(4), 109-112.
11. Cordes, S. M. (1989). The changing rural environment and the relationship between health services and rural development. Health Services Research, 23(6), 657-784.
12. Coward, R. T., & Cutler, S. J. (1989). Informal and formal health care systems for the rural elderly. Health Services Research, 23(6), 785-806.
13. Daubert, E. A. (1979). Patient classification and outcome criteria. Nursing Outlook, 27, 450-454.
14. Decker, F., Stevens, L., Vincini, M., & Wedeking, L. (1979). Using patient outcomes to evaluate community health nursing. Nursing Outlook, 27, 278-282.
15. Dey, A. N. (1995). Characteristics of elderly men and women discharged from home health care services: United States, 1991-92. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, no. 259. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics.
16. Dillman, D. A. (1983). Mail and other self-administered questionnaires. In P. H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, & A. B. Anderson (Eds.). Handbook of Survey Research, (pp. 359-376). San Diego: Academic Press.
17. Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44(3 Part 2), 166-206.
18. Fehring, R. J. (1986). Validating diagnostic labels: standardized methodology. In M. E. Hurley (Ed.), Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference. St. Louis: Mosby.
19. Fehring, R. J. (1987). Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart and Lung, 16(6), 625-629.
20. Guadagnoli, E., & McNeil, B. J. (1994). Outcomes research: hope for the future or the latest rage? Inquiry, 31 (Spring), 14-24.
21. Head, B. J., Maas, M. L., & Johnson, M. R. (1997). Outcomes for home and community nursing in integrated delivery systems. Caring Magazine, 16(1), 50-56.
22. Helberg, J. L. (1993). Patients' status at home care discharge. Image, 25(2), 93-99.
23. Hendrick, S., & Inui, T. (1986). The effectiveness and cost of home care. An information synthesis. Health Services Research, 20(6 Part 2), 851-880.
24. Hing, E. (1994). Characteristics of elderly home health patients: Preliminary data from the 1992 National Home and Hospice Care Survey. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, No. 247. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Atlanta, GA: Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics.
25. Jennings, B. M. (1991). Patient outcomes research: Seizing the opportunity. Advances in Nursing Science, 14, 59-72.
26. Johnson, M., & Maas, M. (1992). Classification of nursing sensitive patient outcomes. Grant submitted to the National Center for Nursing Research.
27. Johnson, M. R., & Maas, M. L. (Eds.) (1997). Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes Classification (NOC). St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book.
28. Johnson, M., Maas, M., & Moorhead, S. (1997). Evaluation of nursing-sensitive patient outcome measures. Grant submitted to the National Center for Nursing Research.
29. Johnson, M. R., Maas, M. L., & Moorhead, S. (Eds.) (2000). Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes Classification (NOC). St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book.
30. Keller, L., Strohschein, S., Lia-Hoagberg, B., & Schaffer, M. (1998). Population-based public health nursing interventions: a model from practice. Public Health Nursing, 15(3), 207-215.
31. Krout, J. A. (1994). An overview of older rural populations and community based services. In J. A. Krout (Ed.), Providing Community-Based Services to the Rural Elderly (pp. 3-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
32. Lalonde, B. (1987). Quality assurance manual of the Home Care Association of Washington. In L. T. Rinke (Ed.), Outcome Measures in Home Care (pp. 187-204). New York: National League for Nursing.
33. Lalonde, B. (1988). Assuring the quality of home care via the assessment of client outcomes. Caring, 7, 20-24.
34. Lang, N. M., & Marek, K. D. (1990). The classification of patient outcomes. Journal of Professional Nursing, 6, 153-163.
35. Lange, L. L., & Jacox, A. (1993). Using large data bases in nursing and health policy research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 9(4), 204-211.
36. Lee, H. J. (1993). Rural elderly individuals: Strategies for delivery of nursing care. Nursing Clinics of North America, 28(1), 219-230.
37. Lee, G. R., & Cassidy, M. L. (1985). Family and kin relations of the rural elderly. In R. T. Coward, & G. R. Lee (Eds.), The Elderly in Rural Society: Every Fourth Elder (pp. 151-169). New York: Springer.
38. Lohr, K. N. (1988). Outcome measurement: Concepts and questions. Inquiry, 25, 37-50.
39. Lohr, K. N. (1990). The elderly population. In Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance (pp. 69-95). Washington. DC: National Academy Press.
40. Long, K. A. (1993). The concept of health: Rural perspective. Nursing Clinics of North America, 28(1), 123-130.
41. Long, K. A., & Weinert, C. (1989). Rural nursing: Developing the theory base. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice: An International Journal, 3(2), 113-127.
42. Maas, M. L., Johnson, M., & Moorhead, S. (1996). Classifying nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 28(4), 295-301.
43. Maas, M. L., & Moorhead, S. (2001). Nursing Outcomes Effectiveness: Elders with Costly DRGs. Grant submitted by the University of Iowa College of Nursing/Mayo Regional Health System to National Institute of Nursing. February 2001.
44. Magilvy, J. K., Brown, N. J., & Dydyn, J. (1988). The experience of home health care: Perceptions of older adults. Public Health Nursing, 5(3), 140-145.
45. Marek, K. D. (1989). Outcome measurement in nursing. Journal of Nursing Quality Assurance, 4, 1-9.
46. Martin, K. S. (1999). The Omaha System: Past, present, and future. On-Line Journal of Nursing Informatics 3(1). Available: http://cac.psu.edu/ ~dxm12/art1v3n1art.html Accessed June 10, 2003.
47. Martin, K. S., & Scheet, N. J. (1992). Problem rating scale for outcomes. In The Omaha System: Applications for Community Health Nursing (pp. 90-98). Philadelphia: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.
48. McCormick, K. A. (1991). Future data needs for quality of care monitoring: DRG considerations, reimbursement, and outcome measurement. Image, 23, 29-32.
49. McGourthy, R. (1999). Omaha and OASIS: A comparative study of outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Home Care Provider, 4(1), 21-25.
50. National Institute for Nursing Research (1995). Community-based health care: Nursing strategies - A report of an NINR priority expert panel. Bethesda, MD: National Institute for Nursing Research.
51. Ozbolt, J. G. (1991). Strategies for building nursing data bases for effectiveness research. In Patient outcomes research: Examining the effectiveness of nursing practice. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services.
52. Parris, K. M., Place, P. J., Orellana, E., Calder, J., Jackson, K., Karolys, A., Meza, M., Middough, C., Nguyen, V., Shim, N. W., & Smith, D. (1999). Integrating nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes in public health nursing practice. Nursing Diagnosis, 10(2), 49-56.
53. Peters, D. A. (1992). A new look for quality in home care. Journal of Nursing Administration, 22, 21-26.
54. Quad Council of Public Health Nursing Organizations (1999). Scope and Standards of Public Health Nursing Practice. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing.
55. Rettig, R. (1990). History, development, and importance to nursing of outcomes research. Journal of Nursing Quality Assurance, 5(2), 13-17.
56. Rinke, L. T. (1988). Outcome Standards in Home Health: State of the Art. New York: National League for Nursing.
57. Roper, W. L., Winkenwerder, W., Hackbarth, G. M., & Krakauer, H. (1988). Effectiveness in health care: An initiative to evaluate and improve medical practice. New England Journal of Medicine, 319, 1197-1202.
58. Saba, V. K. (1991). Develop and demonstrate a method for classifying home health patients to predict resource requirements and to measure outcomes, no. Microfiche Pb92-177013 February 1991. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
59. Saba, V. K. (1992). The classification of home health nursing: Diagnosis and interventions. Caring, 11(3), 50-57.
60. Scherb, C., & Frederick, J. (2000). Focus on computerized patient records: Standardized nursing language: A necessity for computer information systems. Clinical Data Management, 7(1), 4-7. 12.
61. Shaughnessy, P. W., Crisler, K. S., Schlenker, R. E., & Arnold, A. G. (1995). Outcome-based quality improvement in home care. Caring Magazine, 14(2), 44-49.
62. Simpson, R. L. (1995). Embracing technology: The means to ensure nursing's triumph in the era of partnerships. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 19(3), 81-83.
63. Stewart, C. J., Blaha, A. J., Weissfeld, L., & Yuan, W. (1995). Discharge planning from home health care and patient status post-discharge. Public Health Nursing, 12(2), 90-98.
64. Strahan, G. (1994). An overview of home health and hospice care patients: Preliminary data from the 1993 National Home and Hospice Care Survey. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, No. 256. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics.
65. Tarlov, A. R., Ware, J. E., Greenfield, S., Nelson, E. C., Perrin, E., & Zubkoff, M. (1989). The medical outcomes study: An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA, 262, 925-930.
66. Titler, M., & Dochterman, J. (2000). Grant submitted by the Multidisciplinary Outcomes Effectiveness Research Team, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics/University of Iowa College of Nursing to National Institute of Nursing Research.
67. U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Agriculture (Green, V.L.) (1984). Premature institutionalization among the rural elderly. In R. T. Coward & S. M. Cordes (Eds.). Emerging Issues in the Delivery of Rural Health Services. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
68. Van Nostrand, J. F., Furner, S. E., Cooley, S. G., & Goldstein, A. A. (1993). Social networks. In J. F. VanNostrand (Ed.). Common Beliefs About the Rural Elderly: What Do National Data Tell Us? pp. 37-41. Hyattsville, MD: Nation Center for Health Statistics.
69. Weissert, W. G. (1988). The National Channeling Demonstration: What we knew, now know, and still need to know. Health Services Research, 23(1), 175-187.
70. Weissert, W., Cready, C., & Pawelak, J. (1988). The past and future of home and community-based long-term care. Milbank Quarterly, 66, 309-388.
71. Westra, B., & Solomon, D. (1999). The Omaha System: Bridging home care and technology. On-Line Journal of Nursing Informatics, 3(1).
72. Wilson, A. A., Hartnett, M., & Farrari, P. (1995). Outcome measurement from the functional status perspective. Home Healthcare Nurse, 10(3), 32-46.
73. Zielstorff, R. D. (1994). National data bases: Nursing's challenge. In R. M. Carroll-Johnson, & M. Paquette (Eds.), Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Tenth Conference (pp. 34-41). Philadelphia: J.B. Lipincott.