Theoretical investigation of field-line quality in a driven spheromak

Nuclear Fusion

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 1220-1234

  Cohen, R H ^a   Berk, H L ^b   Cohen, B I ^a   Fowler, T K ^c   Hooper, E B ^a   LoDestro, L L ^a   Morse, E C ^c   Pearlstein, L D ^a   Rognlien, T D ^a   Ryutov, D D ^a   Sovinec, C R ^d   Woodruff, S ^a  

^a LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c Etcheverry Hall MCI 730   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; PHASE EQUILIBRIA; PLASMA CONFINEMENT; PLASMA DIAGNOSTICS; PROBES; RANDOM PROCESSES;

DRIVEN SPHEROMAK; FIELD LINE QUALITY; ROSENBLUTH-BUSSAC SPHEROMAK;

TOKAMAK DEVICES;

EID: 0242337590     PISSN: 00295515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/43/10/025     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Rechester A.B. and Rosenbluth M.N. 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 38
2. Glasser A.H., Sovinec C.R., Nebel R.A., Gianakon T.A., Plimpton S.J., Chu M.S., Schnack D.D. and the NIMROD Team 1999 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 41 A747
3. Hill D.N. et al 2002 Field and current Amplification in the SSPX Spheromak Proc. 19th Int. Conf. on Fusion Energy (Lyon, 2002) (Vienna: IAEA) CD-ROM file exc1_3.pdf, http:/www.iaea.org/programmes/ripc/physics/fec2002/htmlfec2002.html
4. McLean H.S., Woodruff S., Hooper E.B., Bulmer R.H., Hill D.N., Holcomb C., Moller J., Stallard B.W., Wood R.D. and Wang Z. 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 125004
5. Sovinec C.R., Finn J.M. and Del-Castillo-Negrete D. 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 475
6. Duck R.C., Browning P.K., Cunningham G., Gee S.J., Al-Karkhy A., Martin R. and Rusbridge M.G. 1997 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 39 715-36
7. Mattor N. 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 6022
8. Hooper E.B., Cohen R.H. and Ryutov, D.D. 2000 J. Nucl. Mater. 278 104
9. Moses R.W., Gerwin R.A., Schoenberg K.F. 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 4839
10. Chen H., Shan X. and Montgomery D. 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42 6158
11. Hua D.D., Fowler T.K. and Morse E.C. 2001 J. Plasma Phys. 66 275
12. Gibson R.D. and Whiteman K.J. 1968 Plasma Phys. 10 1101
13. Gupta S., Callen J.D. and Hegna C.C. 2002 Phys. Plasmas 9 3395
14. Connon J.W. and Taylor J.B. 1984 Phys. Fluids 27 2676
15. Newcomb W.A. 1990 Livermore CA USA, private communication
16. Rosenbuth M.N. and Bussac, M.N. 1979 Nucl. Fusion 19 489
17. Boozer A.H. 1986 J. Plasma Phys. 35 133
18. Hooper E.B. and Pearlstein, L.D. 2002 Plasma Phys. Rep. 28 765
19. Berk H.L., Fowler T.K., LoDestro L.L. and Pearlstein, L.D. Hyper-resistivity theory in a cylindrical plasma Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-ID-142741, March 2001.
20. Cohen R.H., Hooper E.B. LoDestro L.L., Mattor N., Pearlstein D.D. and Ryutov D.D. 1997 Theoretical issues in spheromak research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-ID-127002
21. Rognlien T.D., Ryutov D.D., Mattor, N. and Porter G.D. 2000 Phys. Plasmas 6 1851
22. Stangeby P.C. 2000 The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices (Bristol: Institute Of Physics Publishing)
23. Modinos A. 1984 Field, Thermoionic and Secondary Emission Spectroscopy (New York: Plenum)