Where's the logic in neurologic education?

Experimental Neurology

Volumn 184, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2003, Pages 48-52

  Gelb, Douglas J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted learning; Education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; EMPIRICISM; EVALUATION; INTUITION; LOGIC; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NEUROLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0242333881     PISSN: 00144886     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00359-5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bleck T.P., Smith M.C., Pierre-Louis S.J., Jares J.J., Murray J., Hansen C.A. Neurologic complications of critical medical illnesses. Crit. Care Med. 21:1993;98-103.
2. Camicioli R.M., Kaye J.A., Brummel-Smith K. Recognition of neurologic diseases in geriatric inpatients. Acta Neurol. Scand. 97:1998;265-270.
3. Casabella B., Aguilar M. Neurological disorders a primary care approach . Aten Primaria. 7:1990;538-544.
4. Gelb D.J. Is newer necessarily better? Assessment of a computer tutorial on neuroanatomical localization. Neurology. 56:2001;421-422.
5. Gelb D.J., Gunderson C.H., Henry K.A., Kirshner H.S., Jozefowicz R.F. for the Consortium of Neurology Clerkship Directors and the Undergraduate Education Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, 2002. The neurology clerkship core curriculum. Neurology. 58:2002;849-852.
6. Gledhill R.F. Task analysis in neurosciences programme design - neurological problems in general practice. S. Afr. Med. J. 63:1983;206-208.
7. Gledhill R.F. Undergraduate clinical neurosciences programme development a consumer-based evaluation . J. R. Soc. Med. 80:1987;620-623.
8. Glick T.H. Malpractice claims outcome evidence to guide neurologic education . Neurology. 56:2001;1099-1100.
9. Guez M., Anderson P.J. Frequency of neurologic diagnoses implications for curriculum design . Mt. Sinai J. Med. 47:1980;364-372.
10. Hewer R.L. The economic impact of neurological illness on the health and wealth of the nation and of individuals. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 6:(Suppl.):1997;S19-S23.
11. Hopkins A. Lessons for neurologists from the United Kingdom Third National Morbidity Survey. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 52:1989;430-433.
12. Maloney F.P. Musculoskeletal and neurologic conditions in rural family practice implications for physical medicine curriculums . Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 65:1984;379-382.
13. Marsland D.W., Wood M., Mayo F. Content of family practice. Part I. Rank order of diagnoses by frequency. Part II. Diagnoses by disease category and age/sex distribution. J. Fam. Pract. 3:1976;37-68.
14. Menken M. Neurologic education for primary care. Relevance of secondary diagnosis. Arch. Neurol. 43:1986;947-950.
15. Menken M., Munsat T.L., Toole J.F. The global burden of disease study implications for neurology . Arch. Neurol. 57:2000;418-420.
16. Miller, J.Q., 1986. The neurologic content of family practice. Implications for neurologists. Arch. Neurol. 43, 286-288.
17. Morrow J.I., Patterson V.H. The neurological practice of a district general hospital. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 50:1987;1397-1401.
18. Murray T.J. Concepts in undergraduate neurological teaching. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 79:1977;273-284.
19. Murray T.J. Relevance in undergraduate neurological teaching. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 4:1977;131-137.
20. Njalsson T., Sigurdsson J.A., McAuley R.G. Health problems in family practice. An Icelandic multicentre study. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care. 14:1996;4-12.
21. Papapetropoulos T., Tsibre E., Pelekoudas V. The neurological content of general practice. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 52:1989;434-435.
22. Playford E.D., Crawford P., Monro P.S. A survey of neurological disability at a district general hospital. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 48:1994;304-306.
23. Ringel S.P., Rogstad T.L. Neurologists - 1991 to 1992. Human Resources in Neurology Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 43:1993;1666-1672.
24. Rosenblatt R.A., Cherkin D.C., Schneeweiss R., Hart L.G., Greenwald H., Kirkwood C.R., Perkoff G.T. The structure and content of family practice current status and future trends . J. Fam. Pract. 15:1982;681-722.
25. Rudd A.G., Wolfe C.D., Howard R.S. Prevention of neurological disease in later life. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 63:1997;S39-S52.
26. Stange, K.C., Zyzanski, S.J., Jaen, C.R., Callahan, E.J., Kelly, R.B., Gillanders, W.R., Shank, J.C., Chao, J., Medalie, J.H., Miller, B.F., Crabtree, S.A., Flocke, Gilchrist, V.J., Langa, D.M., Goodwin, M.A., 1998. Illuminating the 'black box.' A description of 4454 patient visits to 138 family physicians. J. Fam. Pract. 46, 377-389.
27. Stewart L.C., Gehringer G.R., Byars V.G. Patient problems in the office practice of six family physicians in Louisiana. J. Fam. Pract. 5:1977;103-107.
28. Warrington A.M., Ponesse M.E., Hunter D.A., Grant A.V., Grasset D.W., Gray C.D., Hayward B.F., Long D.J., Morrison G.E., Sutherland D. What do family physicians see in practice. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 117:1977;354-356.