Non-neoplastic tracheal lesions: Comparison between virtual CT endoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy;Alterazioni non neoplastiche della trachea: Paragone tra broncoscopia virtuale mediante TC e broncoscopia a fibre ottiche

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 147-153

  Luccichenti, Giacomo ^a   Cademartiri, Filippo ^a   Fecci, Luigi ^b   Carbognani, Paolo ^a   Rusca, Michele ^a   Pavone, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^b Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria   (Italy)

Author keywords

3D imaging; Spiral CT, trachea; Virtual bronchoscopy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREATHING RATE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLLIMATOR; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ENDOSCOPY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SWALLOWING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRACHEA STENOSIS; TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL FISTULA;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; BRONCHOSCOPY; FIBER OPTICS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED; TRACHEAL DISEASES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 0242331713     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Evagelopoulos N, Tossios P, Wanke W et al: Tracheobronchial rupture after emergency intubation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 47: 395-397, 1999.
2. Harris R, Joseph A: Acute tracheal rupture related to endotracheal intubation: case report. J Emerg Med 18: 35-39, 2000.
3. Rubin GD, Beaulieu CF, Argiro V et al: Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. Radiology 199: 321-330, 1996.
4. Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG et al: Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radiographics 19: 745-764, 1999.
5. Udupa JK: Three-dimensional visualization and analysis methodologies: a current perspective. Radiographics 19: 783-806, 1999.
6. Rhodes ML, Glenn WV, Azaawi YM: Extracting oblique planes from serial CT sections. J Comput Assist Tomogr 4: 649-657, 1980.
7. Lacrosse M, Trigaux JP, Van Beers BE: 3D spiral CT of the tracheobronchial tree. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19: 341-347, 1995.
8. Salvolini L, Gasparini S, Baldelli S et al: Virtual bronchoscopy: the correlation between endoscopic simulation and bronchoscopic findings. Radiol Med 94: 454-462, 1997.
9. Kirchgeorg MA, Prokop M: Increasing spiral CT benefits with postprocessing applications. Eur J Radiol 28: 39-54, 1998.
10. Liewald F, Lang G, Fleiter T et al: Comparison of virtual and fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 46: 361-364, 1998.
11. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D et al: Volume rendering of the tracheobronchial tree: clinical evaluation of bronchographic images. Radiology 208: 761-770, 1998.
12. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D et al: Tracheobronchial tree: assessment with volume rendering-technical aspects. Radiology 208: 393-398, 1998.
13. Haponik EF, Aquino SL, Vining DJ: Virtual bronchoscopy. Clin Chest Med 20: 201-217, 1999.
14. Aquino SL, Vining DJ: Virtual bronchoscopy. Clin Chest Med 20: 725-730, 1999.
15. Neumann K, Winterer J, Kimmig M et al: Real-time interactive virtual endoscopy of the tracheo-bronchial system: influence of CT imaging protocols and observer ability. Eur J Radiol 33: 50-54, 2000.
16. Aliberti C, Benetti S, Marzocchi S et al: Spiral TC and virtual endoscopy in iatrogenic tracheal rupture: report of two cases. Radiol Med 102: 178-180, 2001.
17. Polverosi R, Vigo M, Baron S et al: Evaluation of tracheobronchial lesions with spiral CT: comparison between virtual endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Radiol Med 102: 313-319, 2001.
18. Pavone P, Luccichenti G, Cademartiri F: Improving the results of virtual colonoscopy: what the future will bring. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 22: 400-402, 2001.
19. Wang G, Vannier MW: Stair-step artifacts in three-dimensional helical CT: an experimental study. Radiology 191: 79-83, 1994.
20. Yen SY, Rubin GD, Napel S: Spatially varying longitudinal aliasing and resolution in spiral computed tomography. Med Phys 26: 2617-2625, 1999.
21. Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchal G: Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology 185: 29-35, 1992.
22. Diederichs CG, Keating DP, Glatting G et al: Blurring of vessels in spiral CT angiography: effects of collimation width, pitch, viewing plane, and windowing in maximum intensity projection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20: 965-974, 1996.
23. Hopper KD, Pierantozzi D, Potok PS et al: The quality of 3D reconstructions from 1.0 and 1.5 pitch helical and conventional CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20: 841-847, 1996.
24. Hopper KD, Iyriboz TA, Mahraj RP et al: CT bronchoscopy: optimization of imaging parameters. Radiology 209: 872-877, 1998.
25. Wang G, Vannier MW: Maximum volume coverage in spiral computed tomography scanning. Acad Radiol 3: 423-428, 1996.
26. Wang G, Vannier MW: The effect of pitch in multislice spiral/helical CT. Med Phys 26: 2648-2653, 1999.
27. Hu H, Fox SH: The effect of helical pitch and beam collimation on the lesion contrast and slice profile in helical CT imaging. Med Phys 23: 1943-1954, 1996.
28. Beaulieu CF, Napel S, Daniel BL et al: Detection of colonic polyps in a phantom model: implications for virtual colonoscopy data acquisition. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22: 656-663, 1998.
29. Paik DS, Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB jr et al: Visualization modes for CT colonography using cylindrical and planar map projections. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24: 179-188, 2000.