Combination of derived non-linear and linear methods to increase the reproducibility of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 331-338

  Yang, Li Ping ^a   Young, Shuenn Tsong ^b   Kuo, Te Son ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

DNLR; Linear averaging method; Reproducibility; Segmented average method; TEOAE

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; HEARING; HUMAN; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

EID: 0242323716     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992020309101326     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bray, P.J. 1989. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions and the development of a clinical otoacoustic hearing test instrument. PhD thesis, University of London.
2. Bray, P.J. & Kemp, D.T. 1987. An advanced cochlear echo suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol, 21, 191-204.
3. Grandori, F. & Lutman, M.E. 1996. Neonatal hearing screening programs in Europe: towards a consensus development conference. Audiology, 35, 291-295.
4. Hatzopoulos, S., Petruccelli, J., Pelosi, G. & Martini, A. 1999. A TEOAE screening protocol based on linear click stimuli: performance and scoring criteria. Acta Otolaryngol, 119, 135-139.
5. Hatzopoulos, S., Tsakanikos, M., Grzanka, A., Ratynska, J. & Martini, A. 2000. Comparison of neonatal transient evoked otoacoustic emission responses recorded with linear and QuickScreen protocols. Audiology, 39, 70-79.
6. Jacobson, J.T. & Jacobson, C.A. 1994. The effects of noise in transient EOAE newborn hearing screening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 29, 235-248.
7. Janušauskas, A., Marozas, V., Engdahl, B., Svensson, O. & Sörnmo, L. 1998. Otoacoustic emissions and improved pass/fail separation using wavelet based denoising. Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol, 6, 3129-3131.
8. Kemp, D.T. 1978. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am, 64, 1386-1391.
9. Kemp, D.T., Bray, P., Alexander, L. & Brown, A.M. 1986. Acoustic emission cochleography - practical aspects. Scand Audiol Suppl, 25, 71-95.
10. Kemp, D.T., Ryan, S. & Bray P. 1990. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 11, 93-105.
11. Prieve, B.A., Gorga, M.P., Schmidt, A., Neely, S., Peters, J., et al. 1993. Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 93, 3308-3319.
12. Probst, R., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. & Martin, G.K. 1991. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 89, 2027-2067.
13. Ravazzani, P. & Grandori, F. 1993. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: nonlinearities and response interpretation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 40, 500-504.
14. Ravazzani, P., Tognola, G. & Grandori, F. 1996. 'Derived nonlinear' versus 'linear' click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Audiology, 35, 73-86.
15. Ravazzani, P., Tognola, G. & Grandori, F. 1999. Optimal band pass filtering of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. Audiology, 38, 69-74.
16. Rhoades, K., McPherson, B., Smyth, V., Kei, J. & Baglioni, A. 1998. Effects of background noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 19, 450-462.
17. Strang, G. & Nguyen, T. 1996. Wavelets and Filter Banks. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley-Cambridge Press.
18. Tognola, G., Grandori, F. & Ravazzani, P. 1998. Wavelet analysis of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 45, 686-697.
19. Tognola, G., Grandori, F. & Ravazzani, P. 1992. Evaluation of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborns: effects of time-windowing. Audiology, 38, 127-134.
20. Welzl-Muller, K. & Stephan, K. 1994. Confirmation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions based on user-independent criteria. Audiology, 33, 28-36.
21. Whitehead, M.L., Jimenez, A.M., Stagner, B.B., et al. 1995. Time-windowing of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions to increase signal-to-noise ratio. Ear Hear, 16, 599-611.