Pap test: Liquid-based - thin-layer. A new method: Results;Frottis de dépistage: Recueil en suspension - étalement en couche mince. Méthode novatrice: Analyse des résultats

Gynecologie Obstetrique et Fertilite

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 833-840

  Hammou, J C ^a   Bertino, B ^a   Blancheri, A ^a   Kon Man, P ^a   Patoz, L ^a  

^a Cabinet de Pathologie   (France)

Author keywords

Cervical cytology; Intra epithelial lesion; Liquid based cytology; Papanicolaou; Thin layer preparation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CANCER GRADING; CENTRIFUGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; QUALITY CONTROL; TECHNIQUE; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; UTERUS TUMOR;

EID: 0242318885     PISSN: 12979589     EISSN: 17696682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2003.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ronowicz CD, Fields AL. Screening for gynecologic malignancies: a continuing responsibility. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1999;8:703-23.
2. Kristine M, Zanotti MD, Alexander W, Kennedy MD. Screening for gynecologic cancer. Med Clin of North Am 1999;83:1467-88.
3. Richard C, Boronow MD. Death of the Papanicolaou smear? A tale of three reasons. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179.
4. Koss LG. The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection, a triumph and a tragedy. J Am Med Assoc 1989;261:737-43.
5. Van Der Graaf Y, Vooijs GP, Gaillard HLD, Go DMDS. Screening errors in cervical cytology screening. Acta Cytol 1987;31:434-8.
6. Gay JD, Donaldson LD, Goeliner JR. False-negative results in cervical cytologic studies. Acta Cytol 1985;29:1043-6.
7. Feutry C, et al. False negatives in France: multicenter study from the French Society of Clinical Cytology. Ann de pathol 1999;19:S84-7.
8. Hutchinson ML. A new look at cervical cytology: ThinPrep multicenter trial results. Acta Cytol 1992;36:499-504.
9. McGoogan E, Reith A. Would monolayers provide more representative samples and improved preparations for cervical screening? Acta Cytol 1996;40:1.
10. Nuovo Jim, Melnikow Joy, Howell Lydia P. New tests for cervical cancer screening. Am fam physician 2001;64:780-6.
11. Baandrup U. Sampling, sampling errors and specimen preparation. Acta Cytol 2000;44:944-8.
12. National Cancer Institute. The 1988 Bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses. Jama 1989;262:931-4.
13. Linder J. Automation of the Papanicolaou smear: a technology assessment perspective. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997;121:282-6.
14. Nuovo J, Melnikow J, Howell LP. New tests for cervical cancer screening. Am Fam Physician 2001;64:780-6.
15. Michael Lin Raheela Ashfaq W, Michalopulos Eugenia A, Anirban Maitra, Gazdar Adi F, Muller Carolyn Y. Mollecular Papanicolaou tests in the twenty-first century: molecular analyses with fluid-based Papanicolaou technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183(N° 1).
16. Van Driel-Kulker, Mesker WE, Van Velzen I, Tanke HJ, Feichtinger J, Ploem JS. Preparation of monolayer smears from paraffin-embedded tissue for image cytometry. Cytometry 1985;6:268-72.
17. Ploem JS. Preparation and staining of specimens for automated image analysis in cytologie. Quantitative image analysis cancer cytology and histology Amsterdam. N. Y.-Oxford: Elsevier Science; 1987. p. 3-17.
18. Hammou JCH, et al. Recueil des cellules en suspension et étalement en couche mince: trois années d'expérience. ACP 1998;2:15-8.
19. Bertino B, et al. Procédé Cyteasy l'étalement en couche mince en routine. ACP 1998;2:15-8.
20. Bertino B, Hammou JCH, Ploem JS. Automated image analysis for detection of human Papilloma Virus in cervical smears. 22nd European congress of cytology Amsterdam. Acta Cytol 1994.
21. Knape WA, Bertino B, Simbsler C, Hammou JCH. Correlation of flow cytometric DNA analysis with image cytometry in bladder washings. Fifth Annuel meeting, USA Charleston. Clinical Applications of cytometry 1992:16-9.
22. Weintraub J. Efficacy of a liquid-based thin layer method for cervical cancer screening in a population with a low incidence of cervical cancer. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;22:52-9.
23. Bertino B, Hammou JCH, Blancheri A, Lebris M, Patoz L. ASCUS/AGUS: une nouvelle approche. ACP 1999;2:22-9.
24. Ibrahim SN. Prospective correlation of cervicovaginal cytologic and histologic specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106:319-24.
25. Juskevicius R, Zou KH, Cibas ES. An analysis of factors that influence the ASCUS/SIL ratio of pathologists. Am J clin pathol 2001;116(3): 331-5.
26. Papillo JL, Sarka MA, St John TI. Evaluation of the Thin Prep Pap test in clinical practice. Acta Cytol 1998;42:203-8.
27. Lee KR, Ashlaq R, Birdsong GG, Corkill ME, McIntosh KM, Inhorn SI. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:278-84.
28. Monsonego J, et al. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study. Br J Cancer 2001;84(3):360-6.
29. Bishop JW, Bigner SH, Colgan TJ, et al. Multicenter masked evaluation of Autocyte Prep thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results. Acta Cytol 1998;42:189-97.
30. Monsonego J, Aubillo-Touati A, Bergeron C, Dachez R, Liaras J, Saurel J, et al. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study. Br J Cancer 2000;843:360-6.
31. Vassilakos P, Griffin S, Megevand E. Cytorich liquid-based cervical cytologic test .Screening results in a routine cytopatholgy service. Acta Cytol 1998;42:198-202.
32. Germain M, Heaton R, Erickson D, et al. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:168-73.
33. Sara J. Bernstein, Luis Sanchez-Ramos, Boniface Ndubisi. Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: A metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:2.
34. DeMay Richard M. Pathogenesis, detection, and management of cervical neoplasia: a multidisciplinary perspective. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:4.
35. Bergeron C. Thin layer cytology of the cervix uteri. Gynecol Obstét Fertil 2001;28(10):760-4.
36. Viikki M, Pukkala E, Hakama M. Risk of cervical cancer subsequent to a positive screening cytology: follow-up study in Finland. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:576-9.
37. Nieminen P, Kallio M, Anttila A, Hakama M. Organised vs. Spontaneous Pap-smear screening for cervical cancer: a case-control study. Int J Cancer 1999;83:55-8.
38. Viikki M, Pukkala E, Hakama M. Risk of cervical cancer after a negative Pap smear. J Med Screen 1 1999;6:103-7.
39. Mannino JR. Natural history of false-negative Papanicolaou smears: a prospective study using screening colposcopy in addition to cytology. Jama 1998;98:542-6.