Natural history of false-negative Papanicolaou smears: A prospective study using screening colposcopy in addition to cytology

Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

Volumn 98, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 542-546

  Mannino, J Robert ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF COLORECTAL SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer screening; Colposcopy; Routine pelvic examination

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CERVIX UTERI; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLPOSCOPY; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0031768380     PISSN: 00986151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer Statistics, 1997. CA Cancer J Clin 1997;47:5-27.
2. Cervical Cancer. NIH Consensus Statement. April 1-3; 14:1-38, 1996.
3. Katz SJ, Hofer TP Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States, JAMA 1994; 272: 530-534.
4. Germain M, Heaton R, Erickson D, Henry M, Nash J, O'Connor D. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques, Obstet Gynecol 84:168-173, 1994.
5. Crouse BJ, Elliott BA, Nesin N. Clinical follow-up of cervical sampling with the Ayre spatula and Zelsmyr cytobrush. Arch Fam Med 1993;2: 145-148.
6. MacGregor JE. False-negative cervical smears. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:801-802.
7. Davison JM, Marty JJ. Detecting premalignant cervical lesions: Contribution of screening colposcopy to cytology. J Reprod Med 1994;39: 388-392.
8. Shepherd JC, Fried RA. Preventing cervical cancer: The role of the Bethesda System. Am Fam Physician 1995;51:434-44.
9. Mitchell H. Consistency of reporting endocervical cells: An intralaboratory and interlaboratory assessment. Acta Cytol 1994;38:310-314.
10. Davidson M, Bulkow LR, Lanier AD, Smith RA, Hawkins I, Jensen H, et al. Incidence of invasive cervical cancer preceded by negative screening in high-risk Alaska Native women. Int J Epidemiol 1994;23:238-245.
11. Beeby AR, Wadehra V, Keating PJ, Wagstaff, TI. A retrospective analysis of 94 patients with CIN and false-negative cervical smears taken at colposcopy. Cytopathology 1993;4:331-337.
12. Maninno JR. Colposcopy in the routine pelvic examination: Reducing the false-negative rate in annual cervical cancer screening. Female Patient 1991;16:26.
13. Chirenje ZM, Akin V. Screening for cervical cancer: Experience from the colposcopy clinic at Harare Hospital, Cent Afr J Med 39:222-224, 1993.
14. Huckstered RL. A comparison of simultaneous cervical cytology, HPV testing, and colposcopy. Fam Pract Res J 1992;12:53-60.
15. Mayeaux EJ Jr, Harper MB, Abreo F, Pope JB, Phillip GS. A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology. J Fam Pract 1995;40(1):57-62.
16. Frisch LE, Milner FH, Ferris DG. Naked-eye inspection of the cervix after acetic acid application may improve the predictive value of negative cytologic screening. J Fam Pract 1994;39(5):457-460.
17. Van LE, Broekhuizen FF, Janzer-Steele R, Behar M, Samter T. Acetic acid visualization of the cervix to detect cervical dysplasia, Obstet Gynecol 1993;81(2):293-295
18. Ferris DG. Cervicography - an adjunct to Papanicolaou screening. Am Fam Physician 1994;50:363-370.
19. Montz FJ, et al. Natural history of minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:385-388.
20. Ostor A G. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1992;12:186-192.
21. Spuhler S. Colposcopic aspects of the cervix. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1993;22: 729-736.
22. Murphee D., DeHaven M J. Predicting atypical Pap smear progression: A case control study. Fam Pract Res J 13:233-47, 1993.
23. Campion MJ, McCance DJ, Cuzik J, et al. Progressive potential of mild cervical atypia: Prospective cytological, colposcopic, and virological study. Lancet (8501):1986:237-240.
24. Nasiell K, Nasiell M, Vactavinkova V. Behavior of moderate cervical dysplasia during long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:609-614.
25. Nasiell K, Roger V, Nasiell M. Behavior of mild cervical dysplasia during long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:665-669.
26. Koutsky L, Holmes KK, Critchlow CW, et al. A cohort study of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 in relation to papillomavirus infection. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1272-1278.
27. Sheets EF, Constantine NM, Dinisco S, et al. Colposcopically directed biopsies provide a basis for comparing the accuracy of ThinPrep and Papanicolaou smears J Gynecol Tech 1995;1:27-33.
28. Mango LJ. Reducing false negative in clinical practice: The role of neural network technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1114-1119.
29. Scheeter CB. Cost-effectiveness of rescreening conventionally prepared cervical smears by PAPNET testing. Acta Cytol 1996;40: 1272-82.