Auditory accounts of temporal factors in the perception of Norwegian disyllables and speech analogs

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 107-123

  Van Dommelen, Wim A ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242306933     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jpho.1999.0087     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Crystal T. H., House A. S. Articulation rate and the duration of syllables and stress groups in connected speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 88:1990;101-112.
2. Diehl R. L., Castleman W. A. Integrated perceptual properties: The affricate/fricative distinction. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung (AIPUK). 31:1996;. p. 191-200.
3. Diehl R. L., Walsh M. A., Kluender K. R. On the interpretability of speech/nonspeech comparisons: A reply to Fowler. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 89:1991;2905-2909.
4. Dommelen W. A. van. Does dynamic F0 increase perceived duration? New light on an old issue. Journal of Phonetics. 21:1993;367-386.
5. Dommelen W. A. van. A comparison of two methods for measuring perceptual boundaries. Reports from the Department of Phonetics. 4:1997;Umeå University (PHONUM). p. 93-96.
6. Fintoft K. The duration of some Norwegian speech sounds. Phonetica. 7:1961;19-39.
7. Fourakis M. Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 90:1991;1816-1827.
8. Fowler C. Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: Rate normalization and nonspeech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 88:1990;1236-1249.
9. Fowler C. Auditory perception is not special: We see the world, we feel the world, we hear the world. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 89:1991;2910-2915.
10. Fowler C. Vowel duration and closure duration in voiced and unvoiced stops: there are no contrast effects here. Journal of Phonetics. 20:1992;143-165.
11. Hoopen G. ten, Hilkhuysen G., Vis G., Nakajima Y., Yamauchi F., Sasaki T. A new illusion of time perception - II. Music Perception. 11:1993;15-38.
12. TM, Signal analysis for speech and sound.
13. Kingston J., Diehl R. L. Phonetic knowledge. Language. 70:1994;419-454.
14. Kluender K. R., Diehl R. L., Wright B. A. Vowel-length differences before voiced and voiceless consonants: an auditory explanation. Journal of Phonetics. 16:1988;153-169.
15. Lehiste I., Shockey L. Labeling, discrimination and repetition of stimuli with level and changing fundamental frequency. Journal of Phonetics. 8:1980;469-474.
16. Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 49:1971;467-477.
17. Miller J. L. Some effects of speaking rate on phonetic perception. Phonetica. 38:1981;159-180.
18. Miller J. L., Liberman A. M. Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel. Perception & Psychophysics. 25:1979;457-465.
19. Miller J. L., O'Rourke T. B., Volaitis L. E. Internal structure of phonetic categories: effects of speaking rate. Phonetica. 54:1997;121-137.
20. Newman R. S., Sawusch J. R. Perceptual normalization for speaking rate: Effects of temporal distance. Perception & Psychophysics. 58:1996;540-560.
21. Port R. F. The influence of tempo on stop closure duration as a cue for voicing and place. Journal of Phonetics. 7:1979;45-56.
22. Port R. F. Linguistic timing factors in combination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 69:1981;262-274.
23. Repp B. H., Liberman A. M., Eccardt Th., Pesetsky D. Perceptual integration of acoustic cues for stop, fricative, and affricate manner. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 4:1978;621-637.
24. Wayland S. C., Miller J., Volaitis L. E. The influence of sentential speaking rate on the internal structure of phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 95:1994;2694-2701.