Making monitoring 'work': Human-machine interaction and patient safety in anaesthesia

Anaesthesia

Volumn 58, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1070-1078

  Smith, Andrew F ^a   Mort, M ^a   Goodwin, D ^a   Pope, C ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia: education; Monitoring: electronic; Patient safety; Professional expertise; Qualitative methods; Technology: monitoring

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; DATA ANALYSIS; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL STAFF; PATIENT MONITORING; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SAFETY; UNITED KINGDOM; WORKPLACE;

ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; ENGLAND; HUMANS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; SAFETY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0242301158     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03404.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Bratain and Ireland. Recommendations for Standards of Monitoring During Anaesthesia and Recovery, 3rd edn. London: 2000, AAGBI.
2. Eichorn JH, Cooper JB, Cullen DJ, Maier WR, Philip JH, Seeman RG. Standards of patient monitoring during anaesthesia at Harvard Medical School. Journal of the American Medical Association 1986; 256: 1017-20.
3. Sykes MK, Vickers MD, Hull CJ. Principles of Measurement and Monitoring in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell 1991.
4. Szocik JF, Barker SJ, Tremper KK. Fundamental principles of monitoring instrumentation. In: Miller RD, Anesthesia, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone 2000, 1053-77.
5. Smith AF, Goodwin D, Mort M, Pope C. Making anaesthetic expertise explicit. Methodological considerations and subjects' perceptions. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2001; 87: 654-5.
6. Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, Loftland J, Loftland L. Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage Publications 2001.
7. Savage J. Ethnography and health care. British Medical Journal 2000; 321: 1400-2.
8. Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications 2001.
9. Smith AF, Goodwin D, Mort M, Pope C. Expertise in practice: An ethnographic study exploring acquisition and use of knowledge in anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2003: in press.
10. Moon RE, Comporesi EM. Respiratory monitoring. In Miller RD (ed.), Anesthesia, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone 2000, 1268.
11. Sunders D. On the dangers of monitoring. Or, primum non nocere revisited. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 399-400.
12. Research Governance Framework for Health Social Care. London: Department of Health, 2001.
13. Mowatt G, Bower DJ, Brebner JA, Cairns JA, Grant AM, McKee L. When and how to assess fast-changing technologies: A comparative study of medical applications of four generic technologies. Health Technology Assessment 1997; 1 (14): 22.
14. Bijker WE. Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs: Towards a Theory of Social Construction. Cambridge: MA. MIT Press 1995.
15. Mort M, May CR, Williams T. Remote doctors and absent patients: Acting at a distance in telemedicine? Science, Technology and Human Values 2003; 28: 274-95.
16. Reason J. Human error: Models and management. British Medical Journal 2000; 320: 768-70.
17. Roberts KH. Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organisation. Organization Science 1990; 1: 160-76.
18. Delamont S, Atkinson P. Doctoring uncertainty: Mastering craft knowledge. Society Studies of Science 2001; 31: 87-107.
19. Benner P. Expertise in Nursing Practice. Springer Publishing Co., 1996.
20. Atkinson P. Medical Talk, Medical Work. London: Sage Publications, 1995.
21. Struys MMRF, Vinck OEY, De Smet T, Mortier EP. The man-machine interaction. Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica 2001; 52: 413-8.