Moving Up and Getting Steeper: Negotiating Shared Descriptions of Linear Graphs

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 239-277

  Moschkovich, Judit N ^a  

^a Institute for Research on Learning   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030494486     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0503_4     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Brown, A., & Pallincsar, A. (1989). Guided cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Cocking, R., & Mestre, J. (Eds.). (1988). Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Davidson, N. (1985). Small group learning and teaching in mathematics: A selective review of the research. In R. Scmuck (Ed.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 221-230). New York: Plenum.
4. Doise, W. (1985). On the social development of the intellect. In V. Shulman, L. Restaino-Baumann, & L. Butler (Eds.), The future of Piagetian theory: The neo-Piagetians (pp. 99-121). New York: Plenum.
5. Durkin, K., & Shire, B. (Eds.). (1991). Language in mathematical education: Research and practice. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
6. Forman, E. (1992). Discourse, intersubjectivity and the development of peer collaboration: A Vygotskian approach. In L. T. Winegar & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Children's development within social context: Vol. 1. Metatheory and theory (pp. 143-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Forman, E., & McPhail, J. (1993). A Vygotskian perspective on children's collaborative problem solving activities. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & C. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 213-229). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Goldenberg, P. (1988). Mathematics, metaphors, and human factors: Mathematical, technical, and pedagogical challenges in the educational use of graphical representations of functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 135-173.
9. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Sociolinguistics aspects of mathematical education. In M. Halliday (Ed.), Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning (pp. 195-204). London: University Park Press.
10. Hatano, G. (1988). Social and motivational bases for mathematical understanding. In G. Saxe & M. Gearhart (Eds.), New directions for child development: Vol. 41. Children's mathematics (pp. 55-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Inagaki, K. (1981). Facilitation of knowledge integration through classroom discussion. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 3(2), 26-28.
12. Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (1977). Amplification of cognitive motivation and its effect on epistemic observation. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 485-491.
13. Lucy, J., & Wertsch, J. (1987). Vygotsky and Whorf: A comparative analysis. In M. Hickman (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought (pp. 67-86). Orlando, FL: Academic.
14. Mathematics framework for California public schools. (1992). Sacramento: California Department of Education.
15. McDermott, R., Gospodinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24, 247-275.
16. Moschkovich, J. N. (1990, July). Students' interpretations of linear equations and their graphs. Paper presented at the 14th annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Oaxtepec, Mexico.
17. Moschkovich, J. N. (1992). Making sense of linear equations and graphs: An analysis of students' conceptions and language use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
19. O'Connor, M. C. (in press). Negotiated defining: Speech activities and mathematics literacies. In J. G. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. London: Routledge.
21. Pirie, S. (1991). Peer discussion in the context of mathematical problem solving. In K. Durkin & B. Shire (Eds.), Language in mathematical education: Research and practice (pp. 143-161). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
22. Resnick, L. (1989). Treating mathematics as an ill-structured discipline. In R. Charles & A. Silver (Eds.), Research agenda for mathematics education: Vol. 3. The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 32-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23. Richards, J. (1991). Mathematical discussions. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 13-51). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
24. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235-276.
25. Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 50, 241-271.
26. Solomon, Y. (1989). The practice of mathematics. New York: Routledge.
27. Steketee, S. (1985). SuperPlot [Computer software]. Berkeley, CA: EduSoft.
28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. Rieber & A. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 39-288). New York: Plenum.
30. Webb, N. (1985). Verbal interactions and learning in peer-directed groups. Theory in Practice, 24, 32-39.