Effect of two abrasive systems on resin bonding to laboratory-processed indirect resin composite restorations

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 185-196

  Bouschlicher, Murray R ^a   Cobb, Deborah S ^a   Vargas, Marcos A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BELLEGLASS; CEROMER; CONCEPT RESIN; DENTAL POLYGLASS; GLASS IONOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICATE CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESIN CEMENTS; SILANES; SILICATE CEMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0033291591     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00398.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Why carry out esthetic bonded restorations on posterior teeth, in adhesive metal-free restorations? In: Current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth. 1st Ed. Landshut, Germany : Quintessence, 1997:12–25.
2. Hegdahl T, Gjerdet NR. Contraction stresses of composite filling materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1977; 35:191–195.
3. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63:146–148.
4. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1396–1399.
5. Ferracane JL. Using posterior composites appropriately. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123:53–58.
6. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Boyer DB. Effect of composite type, light intensity, configuration factor and laser polymerization on polymerization contraction forces. Am J Dent 1997; 10:279–283.
7. Suliman A, Boyer DB, Lakes RS. Polymerization shrinkage of composite resins: Comparison with tooth deformation. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71:7–12.
8. Suh BI, Cincione FA, Sandrik JL. Examination of experimental cavity substrates as a function of modulus of elasticity during polymerization of composite. J Dent Res 1998; 77(Spec Issue):261. (Abstr).
9. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses J Dent Res 1996; 3:871–878.
10. Condon GR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997; 76:1405–1411.
11. Ruyter I. Types of resin-based inlay materials and their properties. Int Dent J 1992; 42:139–144.
12. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 1989; 68:48–50.
13. Alster D, Venhoven BAM, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of compliance of the substrate materials on polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers. Biomaterials 1997; 18:337–341.
14. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991; 10:107–113.
15. Wendt SL. The effect of heat as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins: I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, and marginal dimensional stability, n. Wear, hardness, and color stability. Quintessence Int 1987; 18:265–271.
16. McCabe JF, Kagi S. Mechanical properties of a composite inlay material following post-curing. Br Dent J 1991; 171:246–248.
17. Jordan RE. Esthetic composite bonding: techniques and materials. 2nd Ed. St. Louis : Mosby Year Book, 1993.
18. Boyer DB, Oian KC, Reinhardt JW. Buildup and repair of light-cured composites: bond strength. J Dent Res 1984; 10:1241–1244.
19. Dhuru VB, Lloyd CH. The fracture toughness of repaired composite. J Oral Rehabil 1986; 12:413–421.
20. Chiba K, Hosoda H, Fusayama T. The addition of an adhesive composite resin to the same material: bond strength and clinical techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61:669–675.
21. Crumpler D, Bayne SC, Sockwell S, Brun-son D, Roberson TM. Bonding to resurfaced posterior composites. Dent Mater 1989; 5:417–424.
22. Saunders WP. Effect of fatigue upon the interfacial bond strength of repaired composite resins. J Dent 1990; 18:158–162.
23. Gregory WA, Berry S, Duke E, Dennison JB. Physical properties and repair bond strength of direct and indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68:406–411.
24. Swift EJ, Cloe BC, Boyer DB. Effect of silane coupling agent on composite repair strengths. Am J Dent 1994; 7:200–202.
25. Bouschlicher MR, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA. Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. Am J Dent 1997; 10:279–283.
26. Della Bona A. Shear VS. Tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995; 74:1591–1596.
27. Söderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99:173–180.
28. Turner CW, Meiers JC. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 1993; 18:187–194.
29. Anusavice KJ. Phillip’s science of dental materials. 10th Ed. Philadelphia : WB Saunders, 1996.
30. Bascom WD. Engineered materials handbook. Vol. 3. Materials Park, OH : ASM International, 1990.
31. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77:122–126.
32. Imamura GM, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB, Swift EJ. Enhancement of resin bonding to heat-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 1996;21:249–256.