Comparison of M-S, M-O, and M-(η2-SO) Structures and Bond Dissociation Energies in d6 (CO)5M(SO2) nq Complexes Using Density Functional Theory

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 42, Issue 22, 2003, Pages 7207-7218

  Retzer, Heather J ^a   Gilbert, Thomas M ^a  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; CHROMIUM; HAFNIUM; IRON; MANGANESE; METAL COMPLEX; OSMIUM; RHENIUM; SULFUR DIOXIDE; TANTALUM; TITANIUM; TUNGSTEN; VANADIUM;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL BOND; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; DISSOCIATION; ENERGY TRANSFER; ISOMER; MODEL; MOLECULAR STABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0242290381     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic030179p     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Weil, E. D.; Sandler, S. R. Sulfur Compounds. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th ed.; Wiley: New York, 1994; Vol. 23, pp 299-340.
2. Levison, J. J.; Robinson, S. D. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1972, 2013-2017.
3. Moody, D. C.; Ryan, R. R. Inorg. Chem. 1979, 18, 223-227.
4. Ryan, R. R.; Kubas, G. J.; Moody, D. C.; Eller, P G. Struct. Bonding 1981, 46, 47-100.
5. 2 with gas-phase transition metal atoms, and with solid surfaces. For the former, see: (a) McClean, R. E. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 8723-8729.
6. (b) McClean, R. E. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 75-79 and references therein.
7. For the latter, see: (a) Rodriguez, J. A.; Dvorak, J.; Jirsak, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 11515-11521.
8. (b) Rodriguez, J. A.; Jirsak, T.; Pérez, M.; Chaturvedi, S.; Kuhn, M.; González, L.; Maiti, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12362-12370.
9. (c) Rodriguez, J. A.; Hrbek, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 719-728 and references therein.
10. 2 and a well-defined transition metal complex, see: Albrecht, M.; Gossage, R. A.; Frey, U.; Ehlers, A. W.; Baerends, E. J.; Merbach, A. E.; van Koten, G. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 850-855.
11. Burshchka, C.; Baumann, F.-E.; Schenk, W. A. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1983, 502, 191-198.
12. Ihmels, K.; Rehder, D. Organometallics 1985, 4, 1340-1347.
13. Schenk, W. A.; Baumann, F.-E. Chem. Ber. 1982, 115, 2615-2625.
14. Mews, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1975, 14, 640.
15. Amsterdam Density Functional program, version 2002.03; Division of Theoretical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; http://www.scm.com.2002.
16. (a) Baerends, E. J.; Ellis, D. E.; Ros, P. Chem. Phys. 1973, 2, 41-51.
17. (b) Baerends, E. J.; Ros, P. Chem. Phys. 1973, 2, 52-59.
18. Ravenek, W. In Algorithms and Applications on Vector and Parallel Computers; te Riele, H. J. J., Dekker, T. J., van de Horst, H. A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1987.
19. (a) te Velde, G.; Baerends, E. J. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 99, 84-98.
20. (b) Boerrigter, P. M.; te Velde, G.; Baerends, E. J. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1988, 33, 87-113.
21. Versluis, L.; Ziegler, T. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 322-328.
22. Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200-1211.
23. Perdew, J. P.; Chevary, J. A.; Vosko, S. H.; Jackson, K. A.; Pederson, M. R.; Singh, D. J.; Fiolhais, C. Phys. Rev. B. 1992, 46, 6671-6687.
24. Van Lenthe, E.; van Leeuwen, R.; Baerends, E. J.; Snijders, J. G. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1996, 57, 281.
25. A reviewer asked for justification for not using diffuse functions for calculations involving anions. Diffuse functions unfortunately are not generally available in ADF basis sets.
26. 6, available from http://www.scm.com.
27. 2 ligand.
28. 2 isomer.
29. Kubas, G. J.; Jarvinen, G. D.; Ryan, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 1883-1891.
30. Kovalevsky, A. Y.; Bagley, K. A.; Coppens, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9241-9248.
31. The number in parentheses is the standard deviation of the measurements from the mean.
32. Schilling, B. E. R.; Hoffmann, R.; Lichtenberger, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 585-591.
33. (a) Diefenbach, A.; Bickelhaupt, F. M.; Frenking, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6449-6458.
34. (b) Szilagyi, R.; Frenking, G. Organometallics 1997, 16, 4807-4815.
35. Gott, G. A.; Fawcett, J.; McAuliffe, C. A.; Russell, D. R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 1283-1284.
36. Frenking, G.; Wichmann, K.; Fröhlich, N.; Grobe, J.; Golla, W.; Le Van, D.; Krebs, B.; Läge, M. Organometallics 2002, 21, 2921-2930.
37. Kubas, G. J.; Ryan, R. R.; McCarty, V. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 3003-3007.
38. (a) Ziegler, T. Can. J. Chem. 1995, 73, 743-761 and references therein.
39. (b) Ziegler, T. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 651-667 and references therein.
40. Ziegler has given a cogent explanation of how relativity strengthens metal-ligand bonds through back-donation to the ligand. See ref 32a and see: Ziegler, T. In Metal-Ligand Interactions: from Atoms to Clusters to Surfaces; Salahub, D. R., Russo, N., Eds.; Kluwer: The Netherlands, 1992, 367-396.
41. (a) Jang, M.; Ellis, J. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1973-1975.
42. (b) Ellis, J. E.; Chi, K.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6022-6025.