Assessing the impact of the Japanese 2005 World Exposition Project on vascular plants' risk of extinction

Chemosphere

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 325-336

  Matsuda, Hiroyuki ^a   Serizawa, Shunsuke ^b   Ueda, Kunihiko ^c   Kato, Tatsumi ^d   Yahara, Tetsukazu ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b AICHI UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Japan)

^c KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d FUKUOKA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^e KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Discount mean time to extinction; Environmental impact assessment; Red List; Sustainability; Threatened

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; HEALTH RISKS; PLANTS (BOTANY); PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT;

PLANT EXTINCTION;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING;

DATABASE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; EXTINCTION; VASCULAR PLANT;

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; JAPAN; NONHUMAN; SPECIES EXTINCTION; TAXONOMY; VASCULAR PLANT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PLANT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; JAPAN;

MAGNOLIA; MAGNOLIA STELLATA; SALVIA; TRACHEOPHYTA;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; JAPAN; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PLANTS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0142259251     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00013-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Akçakaya H.R., Ferson S., Burgman M.A., Keith D.A., Mace G.M., Todd C.R. Making consistent IUCN classifications under uncertainty. Conservation Biology. 14:2000;1001-1013.
2. Burgman M., Ferson S., Akçakaya H.R. Risk Assessment in Conservation Biology. 1993;Chapman & Hall, New York.
3. Burgman M.A., Keith D.A., Walshe T.V. Uncertainty in comparative risk analysis of threatened Australian plant species. Risk Analysis. 19:1999;585-598.
4. Environment Agency of Japan, (EAJ, ed.) 2000. Threatened Wildlife of Japan - Red Data Book, second ed., vol. 8, Vascular Plants. Japan Wildlife Research Center, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1-660 (in Japanese)
5. Gamo M., Oka T., Nakanishi J. A method evaluating population risks from chemical exposure: a case study concerning prohibition of chlordane use in Japan. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 21:1995;151-157.
6. Japan Association for the 2005 World Exposition, 1998. Environmental Impact Assessment Methodology Document. JAE, Nagoya, Japan, 99pp. (in Japanese)
7. Keith D.A. An evaluation and modification of World Conservation Union Red List Criteria for classification of extinction risk in vascular plants. Conservation Biology. 12:1998;1076-1090.
8. Lande R. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. American Naturalist. 142:1993;911-927.
9. Mace G.M., Lande R. Assessing extinction threats: toward a reevaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conservation Biology. 5:1991;148-157.
10. Margules C.R., Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature. 405:2000;243-253.
11. Matsuda H. Trial of the EIA Law System to the 2005 World Exposition. Built Environment. 27:2001;51-56.
12. Matsuda H., Takenaka Y., Yahara T., Uozumi Y. Extinction risk assessment of declining wild populations: in the case of the southern bluefin tuna. Researches on Population Ecology. 40:1998;271-278.
13. Matsuda H., Kaji K., Uno H., Hirakawa H., Saitoh T. A management policy for Sika deer based on sex-specific hunting. Researches on Population Ecology. 41:1999;139-149.
14. McCarthy M.A., Thompson C. Expected minimum population size as a measure of threat. Animal Conservation. 4:2001;351-355.
15. Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., da Fonseca G.A.B., Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 403:2000;853-858.
16. Oka, T., Matsuda, H., Kadono, K., 2001. Ecological risk-benefit analysis of a wetland development based on risk assessment using 'expected loss of biodiversity'. Risk Analysis, in review
17. Reynolds J., Mace G.M. Risk assessments of threatened species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 14:1999;215-217.
18. World Conservation Union (IUCN) 1994. IUCN Red List Categories. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland
19. World Conservation Union (IUCN) 2001. IUCN Red List Categories, Version 3.1. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland
20. Yahara, T., Kato, T., Inoue, K., Yokota, M., Kadono, Y., Serizawa, S., Takahashi, H., Kawakubo, N., Nagamasu, H., Suzuki, K., Ueda, K., Kadota, Y., 1998. Red List of Japanese vascular plants: summary of methods and results. In: Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Plant Taxonomists, vol. 13, pp. 89-96